Jan 9 2013, 05:35 PM
QUOTE(s2peMocls @ Jan 9 2013, 02:44 PM)
Actually, I have responded very thoroughly in many ways, which in your denial refused to see. I will summarize again:
1) Covetousness is a sin (to help you out with your lousy grammar, it is only applicable to the stealer) and adultery is punishable by law in many countries (for both the cheating parties).
2) Your "better man" theory is not only flawed, but stupid, in that you allow qualities that is universally defined as worse (such as subterfuge and infidelity) as a measurement of "better".
3) Your "freedom of choice" theory is not only flawed, not only stupid, but shows you have no understanding on the concept of freedom of choice. You basically want to apply responsibility on the freedom to choose on the cheating party, but deny the responsibility of freedom of choice of the stealing party. Therefore, it shows you lack of understanding on both the meaning of responsibility and the meaning of freedom of choice.
4) The entire foundation of your argument is based on the premise that there is no wrong doing on the stealer's part, I have exhaustively PROVEN that your premise is flawed, which means your entire argument is flawed. But you kept plowing on, which means you are intentionally avoiding responsibility on your part, indicating denial, which leads to your projection problems.
Knowing you, you will refuse to address those points, but instead choose to go around in circles injecting personal insults because you have NO SUBSTANCE. Case in point, see below of your remaining quote.
1) Please state clearly who and what's the condition and limitation for the law to be applicable. 1) Covetousness is a sin (to help you out with your lousy grammar, it is only applicable to the stealer) and adultery is punishable by law in many countries (for both the cheating parties).
2) Your "better man" theory is not only flawed, but stupid, in that you allow qualities that is universally defined as worse (such as subterfuge and infidelity) as a measurement of "better".
3) Your "freedom of choice" theory is not only flawed, not only stupid, but shows you have no understanding on the concept of freedom of choice. You basically want to apply responsibility on the freedom to choose on the cheating party, but deny the responsibility of freedom of choice of the stealing party. Therefore, it shows you lack of understanding on both the meaning of responsibility and the meaning of freedom of choice.
4) The entire foundation of your argument is based on the premise that there is no wrong doing on the stealer's part, I have exhaustively PROVEN that your premise is flawed, which means your entire argument is flawed. But you kept plowing on, which means you are intentionally avoiding responsibility on your part, indicating denial, which leads to your projection problems.
Knowing you, you will refuse to address those points, but instead choose to go around in circles injecting personal insults because you have NO SUBSTANCE. Case in point, see below of your remaining quote.
2) Please do tell who is the one unfaithful in a relationship that involves 3 party. The spannar or the person that owes his/her partner his/her loyaly.
3) THE cheating party is responsible on the action of giving the approval for the 3rd party. Besides, everyone is responsible for their own happiness. I dare you to say it's not. Hence, the intend of fighting for what will make 3rd party happy is not wrong. But with only one condition that 3rd party has the approval for the other person which THE cheating party that shouldn't gave that approval in the first place. Don't bullshit me a spannar can be successful without this approval. You must be ostrich to believe so.
4) I did not specifically says all methods of spannaring action are not wrong. However, your argument only targets specific few action e.g. sabotaging, defaming, bla bla bla with foul intend but blatantly ignored the good intend by showing a better universally defined good attributes, e.g. loving, caring, etc etc. Now, is that' not a terrible projection of yours? Even this term you used "subterfuge" is based on THE projection of foul intend.
I addressed your question with question that you know your answer will have you cornered by your own stupidity.
Perhaps, you are right that I'm wrong to overestimate you stupidity. You are just ostrich to bury your brain somewhere.
My point is easy. Everybody is fighting for their happiness. How they choose to fight, alongside with you or against you, is entirely up to the individual choice. A universal choice that you refuse to admit.
If ever you really got dumped by a hypergamous b*tch and be with another guy, it's obvious that she is fighting against you which a choice she made. Just you choose to be oblivious about the approval that she gave other person and her choice to be unfaithful to you. Which actually render the other from any fault isn't it?
Quote
0.0224sec
0.66
6 queries
GZIP Disabled