QUOTE(rzkb @ Dec 11 2012, 09:32 AM)
among the 60k people, there must be quite a lot that are genuine victim and who really needs the money to pay for their mother's cancer, son's leukemia, treatment for themselves or etc.
so what if they vote for people who can help them get back their money, their money is for family, and family always comes first..
plus, both political parties are not angels either..
its easy to say behind the monitor and call those victims greedy and selfish for no reason
I agree that neither side are angels. I'm voting for PR in the next GE not so much because I believe in them, but rather because I do believe in the saying 'Politicians are diapers - they both need to be changed often, for the same reasons". The longer one party stays in power, the dirtier they become and BN has been in power for very very long.
I am not merely accusing them of greed. I am accusing them of HYPOCRISY. If you look on the GMS page, they are all making such a huge fuss about corruption, cronyism, etc etc but all is forgiven if Genneva is unfrozen? WTF? Do you not see the conflict here? Would not such an act be blatant toadyism?
What the folks on GMS want is not just their money back. They want Genneva to be allowed to continue as before, basically drawing in even more people into the scheme. In their view, its because Genneva did nothing wrong. From my viewpoint, it looks to me like they want new money coming in to that Genneva has money to pay them back.
Like I've said before here, I sympathize with Bestino victims and do hope they get their money back. I can respect their ability to organize, stay focused on their goal, and not bring up all sort of irrelevant issues.
GMS, on the other hand, is a completely different matter. I hope the customers actually sue the consultants on GMS for their gold in hand (yes, this IS an option) in order to offset their losses.
Added on December 11, 2012, 11:16 amOK, I have some time to kill so I'm going to debunk more of the quackery on GMS.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/genneva-mala...301417356642829QUOTE
The latest series of coordinated news report telling half-truths are obviously fear-mongering, intended to divide and rule Gennevarians who are steadfastly united with the company and against BNM’s charade and unjust raid. The recent publicized news from the week of 3rd – 7th December 2012 were clearly intended to cause unimaginable worries, fear and confusion amongst us, dampening our spirit and belief in the company … which in turn our belief in the truth … in the hope we turn against the company.
Half-truths? Based on what do you make that accusation? Allow me to cite the announcement from Genneva's own directors
"We verily believe that the published figures may not be correct and may be exaggerated."
Why on earth is the word 'verily' being used in the same sentence as 'may'? Do you know what verily means? In this case, 'verily believe' means that they truly believe. It implies that they are indeed confident about their convictions. Than they go on to say 'may' which means they are not certain? If they are really that confident that BNM is lying on its report, this is how they should have worded their announcement.
"We verily believe that the published figures are not correct and are likely exaggerated."
See what a big different that makes? You might say I'm just being a grammar nazi here, but does this not sound like the directors are leaving themselves some wiggle room for legal reasons?
BNM was merely releasing the initial report of the forensic accounting that is being conducted by international accounting firms. You might question the integrity and impartiality of BNM's officers, but the accounting firms have standards to follow. What I find amusing is how you rank amateurs somehow think you know better than certified professionals.
QUOTE
Well, BNM, we have seen through your devious and insidious plans in attempting to plot the downfall of Genneva Malaysia.
The series of exposé to date have uncovered your officers’ hands behind events leading up to your unprecedented raid of the company. How then can anyone now trust the various statements issued by BNM? BNM being the lead agency in this circus of an investigation and feeds its ‘findings’ to the various authorities. How objective can their ‘findings’ be when one or some of their officers were plotting the company’s downfall all along? No wonder even Deputy Ministers were duped into making non-sensible statements.
All you've exposed is how Mazlan Ahmad is guilty of unprofessional conduct. I see no evidence of there being a greater conspiracy at large to plot anyone's downfall. If you do have it, show it.
You want a conspiracy? There is talk that the Genneva directors instigated the raid themselves. Why? Because the company was running out of money and the directors would rather have the wrath of the customers focused on BNM instead. Is there any soild evidence to prove this? No, but the theory is given weight by the forensic accounting results. It certainly has more basis than your accusation.
QUOTE
Genneva Malaysia Sdn Bhd, a legally setup Gold trading company, have not contravened any laws. What BNM did was absolutely unjust and a clear demonstration of abuse of power.
BNM did it based on “suspicion”, and then justified it as an effort to protect us. How are they protecting us when our money and gold were taken away with no definite deadline for which our assets will be returned to us? Past track records have shown a consistent pattern of such raids. They will take years and at the end of it, no accountability of the seized assets. Over time, people tend to give up and forget. So BNM’s strategy works very well by intentionally delaying the outcome of such raids.
Going by that forensic accounting report, I'm afraid that disbursement isn't going to come so soon if only because there isn't enough money to pay back everyone. If they let everyone put in their claims now, who should they pay back first and how much? What would be fair? Note that once they pay back the money owed to those who sold their gold, there's only 10 million. Will that even suffice to pay your heebah for past 3 months? Let's not forget the people who are still owed their gold.
You think BNM shouldn't have raided? I agree. They should have delayed for 2 months and let the company run out of funds on its own. However, if they did wait that long, there might not even be scraps left to distribute to the victims than you folks would be complaining about how BNM didn't do their job.
QUOTE
bla bla bla etc etc etc.
As an analogy, can you imagine if BNM were to close a bank down for a couple of months and then looks at its assets to assess whether they can cover its liabilities. What if all the depositors were to withdraw? Is the bank able to liquidate all its assets to pay on demand all its deposits at the same time? What about moneys moved from the bank to its other operations or subsidiaries or other investments? Can they be recalled all at once to settle the deposits?
Nope. Terrible analogy. Not going to accept this one. I thought Genneva is a gold trading company? There is no 'interest'. Only 'hibah'. Customers don't 'invest'. They are 'gold traders'. You guys use all sort of funky terminology just so that you can escape the definition of 'deposit taking'. You go to such lengths to differentiate Genneva from a bank, and now you want to compare Genneva with one? Sorry, you argument is invalid. Thank you, try again.
Lazy to respond to the rest...
This post has been edited by arubin: Dec 11 2012, 11:16 AM