Well said, please name more of Villamas projects because they are mostly recurring buyers and I wonder why. As for your statement on developer who cares about profit but never really deliver in terms of quality, generally no business owners will hv the right mind to say that they do not want to profit... But when it comes to quality, unless the quality of their product has been consistently poor, only can we say that they are unreliable. In the case of Villamas, looks like they are no where near being unreliable bro....  

Now this is quite a constructive comment. The problem with forums are, people get emotionally attached to comments that is conveyed out of frustration. And with just merely a fixable issue, things can be blown out of proportion. Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been, when it comes to rectifying defects and addressing resident's concerns? Even if there is, no one really announce it on forums, hence, only the bad stuff lingers around here. nevertheless, This has been of great help to Villamas, as they continue to better themselves and channels these feedbacks to something of greater use.

it is unrealiable... I'm one of ex-Villamas purchaser.. the problem keep coming until warranty expired (after 18 month).. I have spent about RM30k ++ just to rectify my ex-unit (lucky to buyer) after the warranty expiry date.. I from zero knowlegde on house leaking become an expert already.. To investigate this matter, I have made survey on Villamas other completed project.. so yaaa... it's terible..

till now, other owners who dare not to spend like me still facing the problem.. even they need to call authority to check on this matter..

So you are any Villamas Prop owner?

---

Added on November 16, 2012, 11:51 am

I wrote base on my own real life, money and time experience... 

Wow for someone who has made some profit from the sub-sale of Villamas project and yet have something bad to talk about, your credibility should be questioned. Just from what you claimed, of conducting a survey, without any supporting facts, it'll always remain as an accusation. Anyway, from the very inadequate info you provided, I am assuming u r referring to Atmosfera, which it's defect liability period is no where near to expiry. And for the only point that u hv been advocating, It's called water proofing. Why would you repair at your own cost when it's still under the defects liability period? I am very very very confused....  Pls enlighten me...

Bro... After 18 months of warranty period, do you think developer bother to entertain u? my cost of repair is after warranty period, as developer unable to solve it.. I hv made profit? I purchased for my own use and my selling price is only par with my cost.. I move out because no more privacy within the area...

Facts?    there are few letter wrote by JMB to conduct the inspection with authority on the problem..

Not to stop buyer to gamble.. But beware... 

Well, I Appreciate all the personal opinions about Villamas thus far. And as the saying goes, what doesn't kill you, makes u stronger. And being among the few out of the thousands who were part of Villamas projects, your opinions are equally treated with utmost importance.

Well, I Appreciate all the personal opinions about Villamas thus far. And as the saying goes, what doesn't kill you, makes u stronger. And being among the few out of the thousands who were part of Villamas projects, your opinions are equally treated with utmost importance. To place all credits to those who vested in Villamas project and none on the developer itself on the basis that the bullish market atmosphere was favorable, seems like an understatement. Not all are making money yet especially those who thought they missed the bandwagon and jumped into locations with imbalanced growth rate between supply and demand. When a location's growth rate turns into developments built out of trend versus location built out of needs, you risk having an oversupply of property and place you in a position where u hv little control over your price demand from the secondary market. If you notice, Villamas projects have always been built in developing town ships with a favorable maturing rate, hence, making buyers the pioneers of a location in particular.

To create a simpler understanding on the quality of Villamas projects, Villamas has never denied any of such cases but hv always looked into it from a legal perspective. And for whatever matters brought up for a constructive discussion, they are all temporary and rectifiable. Methods taken by certain quarters in confronting the problems are also a representation of themselves. The reason for us to hv recurring buyers is due to the fact that not all projects are affected, like other developers, we have a fair share of happy and unhappy buyers and we place great importance in the selection of land for future developments. Villamas does not believe in a hit and run business as they continue to better themselves from all angels. Meanwhile, I too, from a buyer's perspective will understand the frustrations some has endured that is why I dare to confront the issue head on by using my actual name in this forum.

My voice here does not represent any parties in particular, but I wish that people can look at issues from a wider spectrum. Opinions are always subjective facts are always true, In the case of Villamas, out of so many other projects, they hv had their fair share of success and challenges. Lets not over generalize. For those who placed their bet on Villamas, the risk are much lower now, becos once bitten, twice shy, it only makes so much more sense for them to make it right for Verde.

Well, I Appreciate all the personal opinions about Villamas thus far. And as the saying goes, what doesn't kill you, makes u stronger. And being among the few out of the thousands who were part of Villamas projects, your opinions are equally treated with utmost importance. To place all credits to those who vested in Villamas project and none on the developer itself on the basis that the bullish market atmosphere was favorable, seems like an understatement. Not all are making money yet especially those who thought they missed the bandwagon and jumped into locations with imbalanced growth rate between supply and demand. When a location's growth rate turns into developments built out of trend versus location built out of needs, you risk having an oversupply of property and place you in a position where u hv little control over your price demand from the secondary market. If you notice, Villamas projects have always been built in developing town ships with a favorable maturing rate, hence, making buyers the pioneers of a location in particular.

To create a simpler understanding on the quality of Villamas projects, Villamas has never denied any of such cases but hv always looked into it from a legal perspective. And for whatever matters brought up for a constructive discussion, they are all temporary and rectifiable. Methods taken by certain quarters in confronting the problems are also a representation of themselves. The reason for us to hv recurring buyers is due to the fact that not all projects are affected, like other developers, we have a fair share of happy and unhappy buyers and we place great importance in the selection of land for future developments. Villamas does not believe in a hit and run business as they continue to better themselves from all angels. Meanwhile, I too, from a buyer's perspective will understand the frustrations some has endured that is why I dare to confront the issue head on by using my actual name in this forum.

My voice here does not represent any parties in particular, but I wish that people can look at issues from a wider spectrum. Opinions are always subjective facts are always true, In the case of Villamas, out of so many other projects, they hv had their fair share of success and challenges. Lets not over generalize. For those who placed their bet on Villamas, the risk are much lower now, becos once bitten, twice shy, it only makes so much more sense for them to make it right for Verde.

...people get emotionally attached to comments that is conveyed out of frustration. And with just merely a fixable issue, things can be blown out of proportion. Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been, when it comes to rectifying defects and addressing resident's concerns? Even if there is, no one really announce it on forums, hence, only the bad stuff lingers around here. nevertheless, This has been of great help to Villamas, as they continue to better themselves and channels these feedbacks to something of greater use...

..Lets not over generalize. For those who placed their bet on Villamas, the risk are much lower now, becos once bitten, twice shy, it only makes so much more sense for them to make it right for Verde...

Yeah, people got frustrated. Why? Because some developer repeatedly fails to rectify the issues faced by the purchasers.

Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been? Yeah, I know because I experienced it. The answer is NOT VERY EFFICIENT at all. If they are so efficient, please ask them, as on late Oct, why there is no confirmed date to fix Atmosfera's elevators yet?

Please why only few months after handovers already got flooding problem in basement carpark and common corridor when it rains heavily? Why even the barbeque pit got issue?

I am not over generalizing. I speak with specifics. And why I dare to say all this without fearing libel lawsuit from Villamas? Because it is all true.

Actually i read about Villamas's shoddy workmanship before I purchased Atmosfera. I thought, this condo is their first venture into the higher-end market, so they will put in 110% to make sure this project is a success. Then they will have a good example to showcase when they market Serin, Zefer and Verde.

Well, I don't know how many % they put in in reality, but I know it is definitely NOT GOOD enough!

So what make anyone think they have learned their lesson?

Yeah, people got frustrated. Why? Because some developer repeatedly fails to rectify the issues faced by the purchasers.

Question is, does anyone have any idea how efficient has Villamas been? Yeah, I know because I experienced it. The answer is NOT VERY EFFICIENT at all. If they are so efficient, please ask them, as on late Oct, why there is no confirmed date to fix Atmosfera's elevators yet?

Please why only few months after handovers already got flooding problem in basement carpark and common corridor when it rains heavily? Why even the barbeque pit got issue?

I am not over generalizing. I speak with specifics. And why I dare to say all this without fearing libel lawsuit from Villamas? Because it is all true.

Actually i read about Villamas's shoddy workmanship before I purchased Atmosfera. I thought, this condo is their first venture into the higher-end market, so they will put in 110% to make sure this project is a success. Then they will have a good example to showcase when they market Serin, Zefer and Verde.

Well, I don't know how many % they put in in reality, but I know it is definitely NOT GOOD enough!

So what make anyone think they have learned their lesson?