10q for viewing

ok mula mula,
step1 (take the ground exposure, then the sky sure over abit geh)


step 2 (take the sky exposure, the ground sure under geh)


step3
Photoshop use layer mask, either masking the sky or the ground.

step4 kaw-tim


oh ya u need a tripod as well.

This post has been edited by WildPiew: Sep 18 2006, 03:56 PM

oic...haha..i'm photoshop noob....

ah piew is photoshop sifu ler...
he is too creative la...
beh ta han...

haha...i saw this trick b4 but din try b4...what i can say, ur stiches cant b c...very nice...

nvm we all still learning.

wei, my ps so so jet, this technique learnt it from astro WLT got 1 prog at sat 8pm (dun still got or not), that prog teach photog leh.

haha, 10q first, this tech suitable for landscape pic , coz ur flash cannot fill up that far ma i also first time using, i think can do better leh.

i oso do hv a trick on this kind of photo....but i can say is like a cheat la..

normally i shoot the ground in correct exposure so the sky will over exposure and used the gradually tint effect on the sky...than adjust the level of the tint effect...than the details of the sky will come out...i hv a pic doing this trick will post tonite..coz now no pic...

come post here, post the original n the touch-up1 , i also wan to learn something from Captain @-@ron.

aiyo..ah piew..my touch up skill sux...
haha...i borrow ur pic and retouch on ur 1st pic. hope u dun mind..
no additional retouch,just add the graduated tint effect only.


Attached thumbnail(s)

Captain aaron...
ur retourch skill chun la...
nice...

i have to learn some skill liao...

@henry sir,
not chun la...my skill sux...
i just used the picassa to do it only...it a software for dummy like me..
i dunno how to used the PS..very complecated 1..

piew, thanks for the tip! i've been having this problem recently.. now i know what to do thanks!

me2

for me , i dunno how to use picassa leh. same thing we learn from each other jet

haha no prob, js sharing. looking forward to see ur nice pic again .

I read somewhere that it's better to under than over-expose: so that the details are not lost. I've taken the liberty to do the reverse of what Aaron did. Can see more of the village at the valley, but at the expense of some wash-out effects of the clouds.





Edit:

Still think the stitch 2 exposures into 1 will give better results. Or photoshop can do fill-in on certain part of picture only?..got such feature or not?

This post has been edited by ??!!: Sep 18 2006, 05:49 PM

wah even ??!! also coming cool. appreciate it
??!! u can play around wif my pic la, dun worry i dun mind leh.

1 more thing i forgot to mention which is, this pic i was taken at around 7++am, coz i tot i can get a sunrise shot, but too bad it's another cloudy+small small rain T_T, so actually the environment is not so bright leh

ya..just learn from each other..

@?!!
great touch up.
i agree with u..take in under exposure better than over exposure,coz wont lose the details. in pc..we can always add the light source to the pic.
but the only problem for me is..how much light we need to add in..i tried b4 where view on different pc will hv different result..last time i touch my pic on my home pc, i look great but when view on other monitor...it sux...

so i now start shoot pic at the right exposure...so no need pening...

Thanks!

hahah...i always lurking around..look see and learn techniques mah...

view on monitor , tak accurate sangat.

also prefer to get it right when taking pic. Problem is , when I am travelling, no time to wait for right lighting. Lagi, skills so lacking... kadang just have to hantam take pic. Like they say, lousy pic, better than no picture! However, hope to minimize lousy shots as I go along.

lousy pics also can take back to home to PS to nice pics...
but for me... lousy pics = no pics coz i donno photo-editing...

Aiyoh...ah mah like me can also do 1 step auto fix photo-editing...tak kan techies like you all kenot do meh ???????