Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
56 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 No more experimental shots "Closed door liao", Mr.Mod please delete this thread

views
     
TSWildPiew
post Feb 13 2006, 11:58 AM, updated 19y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Olympus E500
Olympus E1
Zuiko digital 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 UV Filter
Zuiko digital 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 UV Filter
Zuiko digital 50mm macro F/2 PL-CIR
Zuiko digital 40-150mm f/3.5-5.6 UV Filter

This post has been edited by WildPiew: Jan 8 2007, 06:14 PM
TSWildPiew
post Feb 13 2006, 12:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


cont...

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by WildPiew: Feb 20 2006, 10:09 PM
Myth
post Feb 14 2006, 01:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Subang Jaya


Excellent pictures!
I wished i was there to see the real deal. smile.gif
g400g400
post Feb 17 2006, 07:42 PM

"HiTech Gadget Lover"
******
Senior Member
1,381 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak



nice shots, model also nice leh...smile.gif
TSWildPiew
post Feb 20 2006, 01:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


thx g400g400 n myth,
here is my some of the experimental shots, comments plis???

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by WildPiew: Feb 20 2006, 01:49 PM
relaxjack
post Feb 20 2006, 01:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,597 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri
no offence but.... i think you have underutilised your e-500. camera shake light streak may look abstract and creative but to be frank, it lacks subject & purpose. just like handheld fireworks shots. im still looking forward to see some nice pics taken with e-500.
TSWildPiew
post Feb 20 2006, 02:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(relaxjack @ Feb 20 2006, 01:53 PM)
no offence but....  i think you have underutilised your e-500.  camera shake  light streak may look abstract and creative but to be frank, it lacks subject & purpose.  just like handheld fireworks shots.  im still looking forward to see some nice pics taken with e-500.
*
thx for the comment, appreciated it.
TSWildPiew
post Feb 20 2006, 02:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


some shots from P.D.
user posted image

user posted image

BurgaFlippinMan
post Feb 20 2006, 06:01 PM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(relaxjack @ Feb 20 2006, 01:53 PM)
camera shake  light streak may look abstract and creative but to be frank, it lacks subject & purpose.  just like handheld fireworks shots.  im still looking forward to see some nice pics taken with e-500.
*
actually i think the 2d one is pretty cool. its something i would want to look at. laugh.gif it stands out more than the first and has a good manic hyperactive energetic feel to it. smile.gif

This post has been edited by BurgaFlippinMan: Feb 20 2006, 06:05 PM
TSWildPiew
post Feb 20 2006, 08:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Feb 20 2006, 06:01 PM)
actually i think the 2d one is pretty cool. its something i would want to look at. laugh.gif it stands out more than the first and has a good manic hyperactive energetic feel to it. smile.gif
*
thanks BurgaFlippinMan, actually i wanted to shoot something like star wars "light-speed" kinda effects, but.... hai~~ end up something like that doh.gif
BurgaFlippinMan
post Feb 21 2006, 02:00 AM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
you'll never get perfectly straight lines, even with a kickass tripod, not on our roads at least. believe me, i've tried. tongue.gif
RAV4
post Feb 21 2006, 05:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
859 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL Cruisin'


Modelling shots:

All of them seem a little under exposed. You were using built-in flash? But you managed to catch a few at eye level, which is nice. Were you standing on platform also? Cos normally can only get bottom up view...

Blurry shots:
2nd one looks better coz got slightly more focus on the meter/dashboard area. U might wanna try a longer time, hold stable for about 30-40% to catch even more focus, then drive off to catch movement.

Last 2 not so interesting...


TSWildPiew
post Feb 21 2006, 08:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(RAV4 @ Feb 21 2006, 05:23 PM)
Modelling shots:

All of them seem a little under exposed. You were using built-in flash? But you managed to catch a few at eye level, which is nice. Were you standing on platform also? Cos normally can only get bottom up view...

Blurry shots:
2nd one looks better coz got slightly more focus on the meter/dashboard area. U might wanna try a longer time, hold stable for about 30-40% to catch even more focus, then drive off to catch movement.

Last 2 not so interesting...
*
thanks for the comments RAV4
for the modeling shots it look a bit under maybe b-coz my gradation was set as Low key setting.
nope i din use any flash at all, that's y my photo is not so sharp.
to getting the eye level shots b-coz the platform not so height, n there allowed us to get closer to the stage.

for the blurry shots i already try my best to keep steady but still......

last 2, hmm~~pic1 jz simply shoot, pic 2 i actually want to capture the bicycle shadow only.
TSWildPiew
post Feb 22 2006, 08:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


night shots

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

din bring my tripod, most of the pic not so sharp. Jz thses 4 look a bit ok. doh.gif
TSWildPiew
post Feb 23 2006, 09:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Blink, blink

user posted image
Exp 1/2s f/3.5 Iso400


user posted image
Exp 1/4s f/3.5 Iso400

my first time shotting gold colour, any idea how to get the nice gold colour??
user posted image
Exp 8s f/22 Iso100

user posted image
Exp 1/8s f/5.6 Iso400

user posted image
Exp 8s f/22 Iso100

user posted image
Exp 4s f/22 Iso100

user posted image
Exp 4s f/22 Iso100

Any comments?? thanks for viewing.

De_Cruelz
post Feb 24 2006, 03:05 PM

Pro Warranty Invalidator
******
Senior Member
1,238 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sydney, Australia


Nice night shots but if I may ask, why such a high aperture?
TSWildPiew
post Feb 24 2006, 03:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


well, De_Cruelz i also dun have any idea of using wut aperture to shoot, i jz use landscape method (big aperture, small shutter speed) to shoot onli. Is any sifu-sifu can teach some techniques of shooting indoor in low light ar?

This post has been edited by WildPiew: Feb 24 2006, 03:47 PM
De_Cruelz
post Feb 24 2006, 03:49 PM

Pro Warranty Invalidator
******
Senior Member
1,238 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sydney, Australia


Hi WieldPiew! Well from the shots you took i'll just presume that you have a tripod with you. Anything less than 1/60s should be taken with a tripod for best results. For indoor low lighting conditions, its best to use the lowest aperture you have to let more light in. The higher the aperture, the smaller the hole for letting light in hence having to expose longer.

For landscape in daylight, I generally don't use any more than f/10. While the landscape settings you chose to use may be good for night landscape photography, it is probably not the best for indoor low light conditions.

Hope that helps! smile.gif
TSWildPiew
post Feb 24 2006, 03:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,369 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(De_Cruelz @ Feb 24 2006, 03:49 PM)
Hi WieldPiew! Well from the shots you took i'll just presume that you have a tripod with you. Anything less than 1/60s should be taken with a tripod for best results. For indoor low lighting conditions, its best to use the lowest aperture you have to let more light in. The higher the aperture, the smaller the hole for letting light in hence having to expose longer.

For landscape in daylight, I generally don't use any more than f/10. While the landscape settings you chose to use may be good for night landscape photography, it is probably not the best for indoor low light conditions.

Hope that helps! smile.gif
*
really thank you very much notworthy.gif ~~ tonight i think i will go there n shoot again.
De_Cruelz
post Feb 24 2006, 04:52 PM

Pro Warranty Invalidator
******
Senior Member
1,238 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sydney, Australia


Happy to be of help smile.gif

56 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0304sec    0.71    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:05 PM