QUOTE(dundermifflin @ Sep 21 2012, 02:28 PM)
Carrick-Cleverley will be solid for defending, but less creative coming forward. creativity spark can be provide by Kagawa and Nani.
Really? Cleverley doesn't seem great in defending. In fact, he seems to get lost up in attack quite a bit because he likes to play short passes and move around a lot more than Scholes. Hence he'll usually be found closer to the strikers than defence when a move breaks down.Added on September 21, 2012, 3:07 pm
QUOTE(dlct87 @ Sep 21 2012, 02:35 PM)
and as for GK, i do hope that DDG will be the undisputed no.1 for us from now on, only us is "rotating" that position and it sucks for both GK actually
Disagree. I think Lindegaard is a really good GK. He's a lot more confident in dealing with crosses. No one doing something doesn't mean it's not good. Not many teams played like Barca last time, but look at how successful they are now. I don't think it sucks for both GKs. I think they'd rather play half the games than none of the games.This post has been edited by konichiwawa: Sep 21 2012, 03:07 PM
Sep 21 2012, 03:05 PM

Quote
0.0360sec
0.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled