the next batch of AA-X stewardess have already landed n probably they r looking for as many as a dozen units of f/f type C or D.

got this from agent.
1 iranian stewardess for AA-X is urgently looking for f/f type D NOW. wants to move in by mid march. she's currently renting in CJ. the next batch got kar mui.
anyone?

forward ur complaints directly to their chief, Divisional GM, Group Property Services
francis.tan@spsetia.com.my

This post has been edited by aquest: Mar 6 2013, 12:51 AM

Access cards ready for collection.

by giving such pretext not only r they covering up their inefficiencies but also effectively killing 3 birds with just 1 stone.
1. avoid LAD payment;
2. can collect up to 2 months extra maintenance charges
3. cost savings by ending DIBS or interest 'subsidy' up to 2 months earlier.

they can test whatever lah to their hearts' content but should not be charging residents for (incomplete or lack of) services rendered during trial/test period. then why do u think visitors were offered free parking for the commercial parking lots (currently managed by Secure) during the trial period?

they have learnt their lesson well from the adverse consequences of late handover of solace. they need to excercise prudence n start building up more funds as reserves since the warranty period is a lenghty 36 months.

their gain/savings is ur (loss)/(spending).

most reputable developers would have set aside a 'project cost contingency' which is usually 8-10% of total construction cost to help offset expenditure incurred under unforeseen circumstances. such cost does not affect the developer's bottom line but it does certainly affect u, as an individual purchaser since the latter is buying at a price higher than the developer's total cost/unit.

this flyover will be handed over to mpsj for maintenance upon completion.

u have certainly misread.
the contingency is based on 8-10% of total construction cost of the whole (sw) project. the development cost (including land) was closed to rm1 billion at that time.

this is not going to be the first time when expenses (for flyover construction) need to be debited from the contingency cost account. owners of dslh in tmn wawasan whose property were affected during the construction period of sw were most likely compensated out of this contingency fund too.

This was discussed in TZ tread n it serves to discourage kids from climbing. But the bathroom window wan can opt for horizontal bar.

developer's selling price was already >rm370 psf

good workmanship, reasonable price, friendly, punctual but need to compel him to remove all debris after work done.
recomnended 4/5

another area where they have miserably failed to exercise control is the illegal construction of permanent structures (tables and chairs) thereby enchroaching into LHS of vio entrance (a common area) by awave.

wonder what's stopping them (the mgt) from taking firm action during the (illegal) construction stage.

it may give an impression that either the team leaders (azman & mohan) r weak, ineffective or they r not given the necessary authority to carry out their duties..or simply a lack of manpower.

R2-1x-10? type D bathroom is quite spacious.

R1-22-02 ?

the workmanship of jasmurni the main con for r3 & r2 is a tad better than setiakon's r1. the rating for sbv is r3 (72), r2 (73), r1 (71).

the breakdown for rm77 is:
min charge of rm36/mth x 2 mths = rm72
admin charge = rm 5
total = rm77

water charges rate is
first 35 units @ rm2.07/unit
>35 units @ rm2.28/unit

compared to TZ
commercial rate for ZP = rm24/mth
residential rate for ZC, ZB, ZA = rm6/mth
admin charge = rm0

This post has been edited by aquest: May 29 2013, 05:05 PM

i believe the conversion to residential rate is still on going. for this we need to pressure mohan for an answer.

as for TZ (also a commercial status development), residential units were already enjoying the much lower (residential) tariff for both water and electricity charges immediately upon delivery of vp. i have gone thru all the water charges billed issued by HB. yes, my water charges is rm6/mth only.

all i can say is minimum electricity charges is much lower n billed directly by tnb.

understand that the current batch of foreign students studying at binary r from southern african countries such as namibia. r2 for males and r1 for females. at night males leave r2 and most likely to meet up with their female friends at r1.

This post has been edited by aquest: May 30 2013, 07:26 PM

rm520k was something like 6 months ago..still could nego at that time.
Few type c 1007 sf already transacted at rm580k recently.

This post has been edited by aquest: Jul 20 2013, 06:32 PM

Those reports r historical n definitely not real time. To keep abreast of the current sub-sale prices, one really needs to turun padang.

Notice that the unit concerned in the picture used a light curtain to shield the outside view? Why? Coz it is facing a white blank wall? If so ur "survey" is flawed n findings = misleading.

For rm520k, u may try units on the 8th floor but be forewarned that their restricted views r either partially or totally blocked by the SOHO apts. To be very specific, a type c 1007 sf on 16th floor of solace (R3 solace, unobstructed view of course) just changed hands last week for rm580k. U can verify this transaction with the agents covering n stationing in sw. Shonyap should be very well aware of this sub-sale.

This post has been edited by aquest: Jul 21 2013, 05:35 AM