QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jan 12 2014, 03:08 PM)
Cut Your Winners And Let The Losses Run.Thatās right, it's not a typo, and itās the reverse of the usual ācut the losses and let the profits runā.
Unit trusts are long term investments while buying shares directly can be both long term and short. Another difference is that investments into unit trust funds are usually regular savings and savings for retirement purpose. So shouldnāt that the usual phrase within the stock market circle be reversed for long term mutual funds?
Think about it. It is more appropriate to let the losses run in a down trend, especially in the accumulation stage where you will be averaging down the unit price each time you buy.
Secondly, the losses should not be too unbearable if the portfolio has been adjusted to your appropriate risk profile, and would not be too steep if the portfolio is well diversified with each fund not more than 6% of the portfolio and distributed evenly among several different asset classes.
So, always let the losses run; and trim only the winners whenever necessary.
Cheers. And happy investing.
PS. Above is not an original thought. It is from a Paul Merriman article in MarketWatch.com. Sorry, lost the link to the article.
The above statement is wrong and can be dangerous to newbie if they choose to believe it. Let me explain:
Unit trust like stocks has their parameters to measure their performance. I have written many times about the performance measurement of unit trust. The easiest to understand is Sharpe Ratio. Others such as Jessen-alpha, Sortino, Modigliani-Modigliani ratio and Treynor are more for advance investor.
If the unit trust is performing badly among peers, it is not wise to add your money into it; case in point: Public China Select Fund (PCSF).
Unit trust that are performing superbly above benchmark and creating ROI above that of peers, you should maintain it and only sell it if you need the money or to rebalance to maintain your desired portfolio ratio.
Xuzen