QUOTE(CP88 @ Aug 15 2012, 03:54 PM)
you can read my mind! losing as on their profit, not share price.
STOCK MARKET DISCUSSION V124, Seems like no one want this 124...
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
Anyone knows Alaqar's FY12 or FY13 DPU? Thank you!!
This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 15 2012, 03:59 PM |
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 04:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
IHH tough fight to stay support at 3.15.
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Aug 15 2012, 04:46 PM) If hiring. If a person >50 years old working, I doubt they will need replacement. Increase that to another 10-20 years, we can see how many jobless grad waiting to take over their jobs Thing is, one of the main point is low salary here.Because of low salary, many old fella, be it 55 or 60 year old, still not saving enough money to live for another 15 years (if they die at 70-75 year old). And it's not a good idea to throw away the old ones just for the purpose of increasing jobs for the young ones. What we should do is to increase jobs, be it for the old ones or the young ones, same same. Because either old ones or young ones, jobless still an issue (as stated above, salary too low so savings not enough). Just my view. |
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 05:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Aug 15 2012, 05:00 PM) With more automation, jobs will be getting lesser and lesser, whether we like it or not. IMO, there is no way to increase jobs but still possible to maintain jobs. Salary is one thing, the main thing is every govt in the world are actually spending the citizen's retirement fund. They spend it and hope to use the new generations' fund to cover the old one, but not enough, so extending the retirement age will be the only way. In Malaysia, we can still withdraw at 55, as of today, but in US, you will get penalty if you withdraw before the official retirement age. If it only happens in Malaysia, yes, it is low salary. Now in fact it has already happen to US and Euro Zone. Our salary is higher than theirs? I doubt so. That's why foreign investment into our country is very important. BN (got help from advisors TTB/Ajib's bro in CIMB etc) is on the right track aggressively inviting foreign investors to come in our country. This is the only way to increase jobs in the country without spending too much of our own money (be it from EPF or so). Look at SG and we all know how many Malaysians are now there working. Singapore has massive foreign investments and therefore created much more jobs than their citizens need.One of the major issue of western countries is that they don't save, they just spend. That's why China is so rich now. It's basically these rich western economy (with high salary) giving money to China from their very high purchasing power. On the other hand, created lots of jobs for China to produce products for the westerners to buy. Added on August 15, 2012, 5:14 pm QUOTE(cwhong @ Aug 15 2012, 05:05 PM) my points of argument is not purely salary its liased with purchasing power..... which the latter is more appropriate if we discuss about the costs of living ....... rm 3k salary can buy rm 4 per meal, can easily survived and got saving ...... compare with rm 3k salary can buy rm 6 per meal means purchasing power is lower....... i will prefer we can control the inflations and workout a formula (personal spending) to adapt to the money we earned monthly which most of the ppl is fixed unless is commisions based workers ....... Last time when I were in the US college, my room mate, an American, basically have zero savings. He just work part-time in the school's canteen, and got free food from it, and then spend ALL of his salary to buy bags, clothes, magazines etc. Each month, he has zero savings. If next month he not working, he will come to me asking me to borrow him some money to buy soap etc. And how old was he? 25 year old, a rather old undergrad student who suppose to be mature. Added on August 15, 2012, 5:15 pm QUOTE(cwhong @ Aug 15 2012, 05:00 PM) i no good at this. pana gold finger stronger. but this is red-chip, "investors" won't like it. Added on August 15, 2012, 5:19 pmMalaysia 2Q GDP grows 5.4% vs 4.9 in 1Q. http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-ne...s-49-in-1q.html This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 15 2012, 05:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 06:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Aug 15 2012, 05:52 PM) I think China is govt rich, citizen poor, while in US, many of the citizens still able to survive, but yeah, the westerners don't save as much, but more obvious in US due to the banking rules over there, while the Eurozone people still save a lot. Asians are slower to be independent, thus, the working generation now will be sandwich in between their parents and children. In many of the western nations, once you are 18, you are on your own, but here, imagine during my uni time, almost all of my friends getting allowance from family. I think I was the rare one having to work part time to earn my living. ya, all depends on parents one. just graduated already got parents bought them new car. And the youngsters who earn 2-3k a month can change smartphone yearly and buy ipad, can afford go coffee bean few times a week. And many of them expect the first installment of their first house to be paid by their parents as well. It's expected, if parents did not buy, they even not happy. they are so weak. But you are the strong one, started work early. |
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 07:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
除握有大筆現金外,要登上國際舞台,東南亞企業還有其他優勢。部份當地企業正為2015年東南亞地區經濟共同體的誕生作準備。
根據資料業者Dealogic,在過去1年內,扣除東南亞地區主權財富基金進行的收購,該區企業宣佈的跨國併購金額已創299億美元新高,幾乎是去年同期110億美元的3倍,也高於去年全年的232億美元。 http://biz.sinchew-i.com/node/63997 The worst has passed? "Investors" starts to grab "cheap" assets? Wealth is transferring from the west to the east? Only time will tell. Added on August 15, 2012, 8:08 pmKUALA LUMPUR, Aug 15 (Bernama) -- Asean is set to become the sixth biggest automotive market globally by 2018, with vehicle sales almost doubling to nearly 4.7 million units, as compared to 2.4 million last year. Indonesia and Thailand will lead the growth, says Frost & Sullivan in a new analysis, CEO 360 Degree Perspective of the Automotive Industry in Asean, covering four key automotive markets of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. It finds that the market is likely to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.1 per cent (2011-2018). "Thailand and Indonesia vehicle sales are likely to hit one million units by 2013, driven by local demand, increased buying power and significant investments from Japanese original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)," Vijayendra Rao, Research Manager, Asia Pacific Automotive Practice said in a statement. "Thailand is expected to continue its dominance as a production hub in Asean due to the significant investments by Japanese OEMs, incentives from the government, good supply base and required talent," he added. He said the Malaysian government had extended the full tax exemption of import duty and excise duty on hybrid and electric cars for vehicles below 2,000cc until Dec 31, 2013. "This has led to a huge growth in sales for hybrid models such as the Honda Insight, Toyota Prius and Lexus CT 200h." he added. http://www.mysinchew.com/node/76563 This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 15 2012, 08:08 PM |
|
|
Aug 15 2012, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
Main contributor for the quarter is construction sector.
Hmm.....will it be....coming soon? |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 02:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
WB bought lots of US O&G stocks(NOV and Phillips66) in past 3 months.
It has nothing to do with Perisai though....almost nothing, except for the optimistic on O&G sector worldwide. Added on August 16, 2012, 10:45 am QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 10:41 AM) 2011 EPS - 136 sen Sounded very sarcastic. Don't understand why you so anti "investors". Open up your mind, the world will be better looking. 2010 EPS - 106 sen 1Q EPS - 30 Sen Estimate (Hope) dividend of 1.00. Current dividend yield based on Estimate (Hope) dividend - 4.2%. Great 'investing' idea? If the answer is yes, why don't you just buy? This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 16 2012, 10:45 AM Attached File(s)
Perisai_CU_20120815_MIB_1863.pdf ( 819.51k )
Number of downloads: 19
Perisai_cimb_150812.pdf ( 422.31k )
Number of downloads: 15 |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 11:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
wah CSL still able to stay above IPO price, now at PE 6x. Please maintain above 5x for 1 year, then we got chance to see china companies re-rating.
but not yet reach the 6 months locked up yet right? does cSL got this thing too? This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 16 2012, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 11:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 11:07 AM) Yes, different preference. This solves and clears out the very core facts that I had just pointed. Problem solved. See? The world is now much better. So how you answer the following simple question based on an imaginary stock? ( Would this be a good investing exercise? 2011 EPS - 136 sen 2010 EPS - 106 sen 1Q EPS - 30 Sen Estimate (Hope) dividend of 1.00. Current dividend yield based on Estimate (Hope) dividend - 4.2%. Great 'investing' idea? Based on the numbers alone (which are all facts), would you really, really consider that as an investment? If yes then would you buy more? If you think not, then do you think other 'investors' will buy based on those numbers? No you cannot answer by saying you already own this stock. EPS is just one of the many important measurement to judge a stock, I think. We also need to "feel“ the quality of the management, which is actually very important part for me. Do they appreciate shareholders? Meaning, any corporate exercise(dividend, RI, BI, private placement etc) will concern on their existing shareholders first. Do they have the ability to overcome tough period for the company to keep the damage as low as possible? (recent Japan's hit by Korean competitors, natural disasters etc) Besides, I also look at their above performance for at least 5 years and above, not just 1 or 2 years. And of course, the company business' present and future, definitely. Anyway, this is just about my so called "fundamental stocks" judgement. I also got some other "punter stocks" in my portfolio too, such as DRBHCOM, since their past history sucks, but I'm betting on their future. Same goes to Perisai. These companies have major re-structuring, so need to bet on them or don't buy. Just my view, don't eat me. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 11:41 AM) Thanks for taking the effort to answer. I like your other questions that you have put. But for this simple exercise, try to answer it without these issues. Try to take it as an unknown stock. Rational of the exercise is easy. If you cannot put yourself as an investor and buy the stock based on a 'possible' 4.2% dividend yield then how do you expect OTHERS to invest in the stock? If no others invest, ie if no others buy/chase after the stock, then how would this stock going up in share price? Are you willing to live and hope to prosper based on current dividends? Assume your cost is lower at 20, you are looking at just 5% yield. Is this the best option for your money? Earnings or EPS cannot be ignored. The chain of equation is simple, if earnings don't grow, where would you get money for future dividends? Fish head sounding really good now... rainy morning. Fundamental investing is not just about dividend yield. Like WB said, first rule, don't loss money. To buy a sky high growth stock (ie EPS up 1000% suddenly), yes, it's capital gain may happen overnight to earn profit of 10x, very happy. But what is the hit rate? So some will gain (huge), but some others will loss (also huge). What WB means is, at least, on a fundamental strong company, the capital at least can be reserved (if not slightly loss). This is about play safe. But I'm not promoting must 100% play safe, I'm just pointing out this point. |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 12:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 12:32 PM) Thanks. Once again, you need to open up your mind in discussion. Seriously I accept different perspective. But at least, since this is an open forum, lets hear all the different views. Let me be the anti I. Just share the views and not use different perspective as a blunt execuse. Now here's something interesting I read this morning. http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...81&sec=business That Singapore reit promised a 6% yield payout.... Now isn't that a much better prospect than....... (better don't say name, people so sensitive) Plus point, Sing dollars so strong and stands a better chance to grow vs our ringgit. Yes, I don't think 4% yield is attractive. But EPS growth is not the major concern for many investors, especially institutional investors. Because you should know that valuation of a stock plays a key role on share price upwards, if you haven't realized this key point. Just take a look at Padini, Nestle and Dlady. Their EPS growth are much much lower than their valuation growth, which makes its share price upwards so huge. And I don't see you really open up your mind to listen what I mentioned about management skill etc. As an investor(as how you look at yourself, obviously), you cannot look at short term EPS growth because that could be unsustainable. Does this make sense to you? Or you don't care at all (as an investor)? Speaking of Panamy (no need play secret lah, we all know we are taking Panamy as an example here). Let me list to you its EPS history: (FY year)-sen 2008-85.73 2009-82 2010-85 2011-136 2012-109 2013-30(1st Qtr) And then please compare the above EPS with the attached 6 years share price graph. What do you see from there? The EPS is sustainable for few years and then it grows strongly, and then it slows down. But overall, it's consider sustainable, unlike some other companies that got huge loss or above 50% decrease while economy gets worse. Look at the graph, it's obvious that it's the valuation appreciation that pushed the price up so huge. Any investment takes time to grow fruit. A 3 years time to grow fruit is common for any business. This you also should know, right? Future growth? Lets talk about future growth. Panasonic Japan HQ starts to move out some of its production lines to other countries. Malaysia already one of its target, this is also obvious, by looking at their recent investment in Malaysia. I spend a lot of time to discuss with you, because I like discussion. I always think discussion can benefits many people. But pinpoint has no benefit at all, only create chaos and hate. I don't like that at all. Please don't do that. Just discuss according to our discussion points on the topic. Added on August 16, 2012, 1:00 pm QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Aug 16 2012, 12:47 PM) Isit He WB speculating in real estates As a senior player, I don't expect you to talk like that. Sorry to say this, Sky taikor. What are the past good track records of real estates for last few years ? For real estate investment, we all knows can't look at such short term, and we also all knows it depends on world/country economy situation. As for US case, of course we can't look at 5 years time since that's exactly the time it suffered crisis. Why you brought up such misleading opinion? Added on August 16, 2012, 1:02 pm QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Aug 16 2012, 12:04 PM) WB started to dump those fundamentally strong consumer stocks in US. I think WB dumped those too high valuation consumer stocks, to buy high growth potential fundamentally strong O&G stocks. High growth is not the opposite of Fundamentally strong. They can co-exists. Maybe he is also learning on how to take profits, rather too long term. He is in properties where nobody wants Not for Capital gains if no profits reported by co Turnaround theme perhaps . This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 16 2012, 01:02 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 01:09 PM) The reason why I chose to ignore management issue because no one likes to talk about that here. The assumption is that everyone just accept it as good. However, since you started on it, I had highlighted before (but got no answer. LOL! I wonder why) I had asked why the MANAGEMENT had parked the bulk of the money into that account classified as 'placement of funds with related company'? That 'safe' deposit, as i joked about here, is worth some 460+ million. Now is what's the management doing it here correct? Yes, that said fund gives back Panamy some interest but the interest payment is not consistent and the rate is low. Do check yourself. Last I saw it was a little more than 3 percent. (Any feedback on this or am not going to get one?) The management keeps the huge amount of cash without any investment is better than "simply invest and then makes loss". This sounds stupid but it's actually happening to many many small(and so called undervalued) companies. Fast expansion is very risky because it's like making new businesses instead of doing the existing "proven" business model. Take a look at Masterskill, they have huge cash last time and then invest hugely to build a university campus. Then? Not enough students, and the campus minimizing and halt and huge profit dropped. Reason is easy: expansion needs capital and managing the newly expanded business also need capital. Another example is Proton investing in Lotus, huge mistake. Lotus has been eating up huge amount of Proton's cash without much contribution on earnings, this makes Proton traded at below its assets value. And of course there are smart ones, such as Padini. Expansion but still making more and more profit. As for Panamy, its TV business has been hit big by Samsung, so it has to accept that and do something about it. Not just spending more money for investing can solve the problem, they need to find a way. And many times, rushing for one solution might kill you in one shot. EPS. I would have love to talk about EPS growth. Now that you had diligently brought the table, how exactly would you define these numbers? (FY year)-sen 2008-85.73 2009-82 2010-85 2011-136 2012-109 2013-30(1st Qtr) Would I call that a growth stock based on that numbers? No. I would call it a company which had tremendous short growth in 2011. It just hit the jackpot in 2011 (Was the reason based on the sudden growth in housing projects in Middle East?) and since 2011, the numbers are showing decline. Yes, as you said it correctly, the earnings grew suddenly. This has always been my opinion but as you know, discussions on this stocks in recent months were totally biased towards dividends. And you remember the one reply I made on comparing DLady and Panamy? I asked why DLady shares kept growing and why Panamy did not? Was the answer earnings growth? Ok company's products. I like Panasonic products. I am fanci. However, sad thing is, they last too long. Agreed with you that Panasonic products very hard to damage so sales may be less. But this is how they build the good brand name and this is how the business able to be sustainable in long term. There is always many ways to grow, such as entering new market. As for Panasonic Malaysia, its entering to Middle East was not so lucky since war happening now. But can't deny that is a huge market there, although facing China's tough low-pricing competition. But I'm seeing China's product can no longer be so cheap in near future because their salary and living expenses have been growing up fast. I'm seeing it on par with most Asian countries in 2 years time. And then, it's the Japan HQ's decision of moving some parts out of Japan that keeps me optimistic. If remember correctly, they are moving the HQ office to Singapore. And we are so near to Singapore. If they slowly shift more productions into Malaysia's factories, the growth potential can be huge. Dividend. This is second to me actually. The first one is growth, which is inline with your strategy. So why dividend? Because we wish to buy at lower valuation, which means before the growth starts to get fruits. So we need to buy in advance, and then wait for the fruit to come. And at the waiting time, a dividend is good so that we have some income to ease our boring waiting time. This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 16 2012, 01:38 PM |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 01:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(Boon3 @ Aug 16 2012, 01:43 PM) The management keeps the huge amount of cash without any investment is better than "simply invest and then makes loss". This sounds stupid but it's actually happening to many many small(and so called undervalued) companies. - I would not have compared with other companies since our chat today focused on Panamy. Anyway, what about the other option? Since it doesn't know what to invest, ie 'simply invest and then make loss", why not give back to shareholders? By not doing so, this is like that said related company is enjoying a cheap loan from Panamy. Is that right? Keeping cash is same as we, stock punters, usually don't use 100% of our money to buy stocks. We will keep some cash. If one day we sick, use it for medication. If one day got lelong sales, use it for "investment". Very simple technique. I failed to reply you on one point. Rather rude not to reply you. The farthest left of the chart, I see the prices between 8-9+. If Panamy eps then was 85 sen. that stock would have been super cheap. Would this not be a reason why it went up? Plus the dividends it was giving, investing then made sense. My view la. Now? Stock not cheap. No immediate growth seen and current dividend yield is low. Any catalyst to invest now? Yes, I agree with you. At current price, Panamy is not cheap. I am not adding more. I bought from 19 to 21 and then stopped. Earliest bought at Nov 2011. I didn't caught the cheap fish at below 10.00 that time. Added on August 16, 2012, 1:54 pm QUOTE(StupidGuyPlayComp @ Aug 16 2012, 01:42 PM) This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 16 2012, 01:54 PM |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(jy1905 @ Aug 16 2012, 03:42 PM) i rmember someone excitedly made numerous calls on rubber counters He won't reply you lah! He got no opinion one, only buy calls. perhaps this news will be useful to you http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-ne...000-tonnes.html |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
wah, Axreit goes mad.
Maybe they want to buy asset in Mars. Properties price still super undervalued there. |
|
|
Aug 16 2012, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0737sec
1.13
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:18 PM |