Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Hyundai Elantra MD Ver.7, Calling All Elantra Owners & Future Ones

views
     
cybermaster98
post Aug 2 2012, 02:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Why would SD even raise the price of the Elantra? I think its a foolish move. mad.gif
cybermaster98
post Aug 2 2012, 02:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Aug 2 2012, 02:06 PM)
Perhaps to "slow down" demand for elantra.
They receive more than 5000 bookings already.
Nobody raises prices to slow down bookings la. doh.gif

And bookings dont mean anything unless its converted to actual sales. If the waiting period is 5-7 months, how many will actually wait patiently? Never trust booking statistics. Nobody actually checks this info. It may or may not be true.
cybermaster98
post Aug 27 2012, 05:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Whats the best loan interest rates currently for the Elantra 1.8?


Added on August 27, 2012, 5:37 pm
QUOTE(JC999 @ Aug 25 2012, 01:28 AM)
cuz their weather there very different... if you drive a white.. it will turn black very fast..

just like in malaysia, everyday rain.. your black car becomes very dirty after that
The rain affects white and dark colors. Only Silver holds up well against dirt.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 27 2012, 05:37 PM
cybermaster98
post Aug 27 2012, 05:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ryanliew87 @ Aug 25 2012, 09:29 PM)
i notice tat our car can achieves greater mileage for the first half tank(im referring to my TRIP B setting)...and then it will start declining gradually 2nd half tank onwards......wondering how is the calculation works hmm.gif
Does the Elantra come with a Distance to Empty reading (DTE)?
cybermaster98
post Aug 27 2012, 05:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Whats the best selling Elantra model in Malaysia currently based on your knowledge or official stats?
cybermaster98
post Aug 27 2012, 09:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ryanliew87 @ Aug 25 2012, 09:29 PM)
i notice tat our car can achieves greater mileage for the first half tank(im referring to my TRIP B setting)...and then it will start declining gradually 2nd half tank onwards......wondering how is the calculation works hmm.gif
All cars will usually get better mileage the first half of the tank. The reason being the max fuel sensor isnt located at the very top of the tank. Thats why the first bar drops the slowest in any car. Also, more fuel is lost when the tank is half empty compared to a almost full tank.
cybermaster98
post Aug 28 2012, 09:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ryanliew87 @ Aug 27 2012, 11:23 PM)
i think i shud try pump half tank instead of full tank to see any significance difference anot biggrin.gif
Nothing to test actually. Its common knowledge that ull get better mileage with the first half of the tank compared to the final half. What's more important is your fuel consumption and actual mileage per full tank.

For those of you with Distance to Empty meters, do a test and find out the actual consumption at various speeds. Ive found the following:

1) At 110kmph, DTE dropped 50km but actual distance travelled was 100km
2) At 130kmph, DTE dropped 50km but actual distance travelled was 65km
3) At 150kmph, DTE was same as the actual distance travelled.

So basically driving up to 140kmph on a straight moderately flat highway is still considered quite economical. Btw, my car is a Kia Optima K5.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 28 2012, 09:08 AM
cybermaster98
post Aug 28 2012, 12:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(terdit @ Aug 28 2012, 11:40 AM)
Just call the hotline, my queue number is 3477
the operator say since waiting period is 4 month and i booked on 22 July, estimate around Oct will get the car sad.gif
U mean there are 3476 others waiting before you? Is this number for Malaysia alone? shocking.gif
cybermaster98
post Aug 29 2012, 07:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ReaperX @ Aug 29 2012, 12:53 AM)
i'd rather forgo all the freebies and get the car fast, rather than waiting 3-4 mths or some even say 7 mths  rclxub.gif
Back to ur question, i would take the hi spec anytime.... features like VSM alone is already a good enuff reason.

The price difference is like what, RM5K between HS and STD? What is RM5K compared to ur life mang...u never know when u'll need it. Safety is priority...
Yes i second that. Well said.

A new car without VSM would be banned in America, Europe and Australia but yet in Malaysia its acceptable. Why? Are Malaysian lives not as important as Americans, Europeans and Australians? The problem with Malaysians is that firstly many dont know how stability control works and therefore are ignorant on its importance. Secondly, we place too much emphasis on resale value and brand recognition while ignoring safety.

Stand up and fight for stability control to be included in all new cars in Malaysia and boycott those which dont have them fitted. This will force the Gov & car manufacturers to make them mandatory. rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 29 2012, 07:59 AM
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 08:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


I dont really know but after so long i still cant fathom how Hyundai SD can price the Elantra 1.8L at RM 114,888 when their closest competitor, the Forte 2.0L is only RM97K. Even the Civic 1.8S is RM 115,980. If the Elantra came in a 2.0L engine it would be about RM 125K. Thats a good 28K extra over its rival.

I know the Elantra design is good but still at this price?? If Naza Kia still keeps prices low with good specs when they launch the new Forte K3 in 2013, Elantra will suffer for sure. I think. What do you think?

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Sep 3 2012, 08:31 AM
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 11:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(666devil @ Sep 3 2012, 10:10 AM)
Yup total agree w BF. gov won't make the mistake twice which killed off their inspira sales. Wait till New forte come than u can compare price. Wats wrong compare to 1.8 civic? It's justified as new civic is ugly and come in empty shell
Well not really. The Civic may not have the looks but its specs are quite ok. It does have Stability Control which is the most important feature after safety belts. Both Civic 1.8 & Elantra come with 2 airbags. The Civic also comes with 5 yrs unlimited mileage warranty and 6 free services. So the Civic isnt really an empty shell.
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 12:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(666devil @ Sep 3 2012, 11:58 AM)
Yup I have to agree they improve their offering due to threatened by HE. They would not have done it previously when they are over confidence and too comfortable. Refer to their 8th gen civic. In summary good that they Started waking up, unlike T who is still honeymooning. Look at their price increase in Camry and feature removed
Yes this i agree too. Its only the competition which will give us the end user, better options.


Added on September 3, 2012, 12:19 pm
QUOTE(ihatemyguts @ Sep 3 2012, 12:00 PM)
Their reasoning being; the forte is on the same platform as the outgoing Avante HD.
Hence, the price being similar to the Avante HD.
Wait until the K3 comes in, and see how it's priced, since it's on the same platform as the Elantra MD.

That is, if you're not counting the political relationships involved.
Yes point noted. But even if the K3 is priced well, SD will then start giving offers and better specs like what they did for the Sonata.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Sep 3 2012, 12:19 PM
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 05:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Sep 3 2012, 03:00 PM)
Civic 1.8 spec not ok. It is empty shell.
A lot features missing. Not value for money.
Not like 2.0 which well spec.
So what's missing in the Civic 1.8S compared to the Elantra?
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 07:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ihatemyguts @ Sep 3 2012, 06:53 PM)
My ESP gets activated on a daily basis... always going into corners with more speed than required.
When it gets activated, you'll hear a faint "beeeeep" tongue.gif
U know thats dangerous right? ESP/VSC is not meant to allow you to push boundaries. Its meant as an active safety mechanism for emergency situations. The beep is to let you know uve reached the threshhold and u should refrain from making it a habit to drive recklessly just cuz u have ESP. Dont forget that ESP only reduces the chances of you losing control of your car but it does not prevent 100%. There are sufficient documented cases of cars with ESP which have gone out of control.

Drive safe always.
cybermaster98
post Sep 3 2012, 07:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mav3rick @ Sep 3 2012, 06:18 PM)

Added on September 3, 2012, 6:18 pm

i'll have a go on this tongue.gif

Elantra 1.8 over Civic 1.8S
01) 10 Way Power Seat (driver only)
02) Cruise Control
03) Nappa Leather Seats
04) Audio Visual Navigator (although a crappy one tongue.gif) + Reverse Camera
05) Rain sensor
06) Light sensor
07) VSM
08) Keyless entry
09) DOHC?
10) Sunroof?
11) LED side signal lights?

Civic 1.8S over Elantra 1.8
01) Power fold side mirrors
02) 6 speakers  (vs 4)
03) ECON mode
Thanks for this. I was just too lazy to compare myself. But the Civic has VSA as standard as well so Item 7 isnt valid. Item 9 should also not be on the list as a SOHC engine is equally good as it gives more torque at low end revs.

Based on this, the distinctive differece between the 2 cars would be Item 1,2, 3,4, 8 and maybe 11 only. The rest is not really required and not many would use it anyway.

But another difference between the two would be the driving dynamics. The Civic's handling is still better and the engine is a tad more refined. Not sure about fuel consumption figures between the 2 though.




cybermaster98
post Sep 4 2012, 11:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mav3rick @ Sep 4 2012, 09:47 AM)
yes, initially i took for granted that the VSA is only the equivalent to the ESP. Upon further checking, then only found out that it has VSM features as well. If i'm not mistaken, among the current Korean makes, only the Elantra is equipped with ESP+VSM. The rest are just ESP.
Well the VSM is certainly news for me. Until now i thought that ESP = VSC = VSM. But now according to you, the VSM is actually a slightly more advanced system.
cybermaster98
post Sep 4 2012, 02:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Did you know that the Civic has more total internal legroom compared to the Elantra? The Civic has 198.63cm while the Elantra registers just 194.82cm of internal legroom.

Just for info.
cybermaster98
post Sep 4 2012, 03:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mav3rick @ Sep 4 2012, 02:15 PM)
the new Civic?? wow.. how did they manage to squeeze in so much space given the shorter wheelbase?
Not really sure. Maybe the seats and dashboard configuration?
cybermaster98
post Sep 5 2012, 08:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Sep 5 2012, 08:03 AM)
Honda Civic:
    Width: 69.0 in.
    Height: 56.5 in.
    Length: 177.3 in.
    Front track: 59.0 in.
    Rear track: 59.9 in.
    Wheel base: 105.1 in.
    Cargo capacity, all seats in place: 12.5 cu.ft.

Hyundai Elantra:
    Width: 69.9 in.
    Height: 56.5 in.
    Length: 178.3 in.
    Ground clearance: 5.5 in.
    Front track: 61.5 in.
    Rear track: 62.0 in.
    Wheel base: 106.3 in.
    Cargo capacity, all seats in place: 14.8 cu.ft.

U sit 9 times in H. Civic also U will notice that H. Civic is a small car compare to Elantra. Space is a bit cramp.
Bro, do you know how interior legroom is calculated? It has nothing to do with the outer dimensions. You can have a car with a longer wheelbase but still with a less legroom inside. It may also be affected by the type seats installed.

The fact is the Civic does have about 3.8cm more legroom than the Elantra. This legroom may be distributed more to the front or more to the rear depending on the manufacturer.

Anyway, interior legroom isnt the only factor of consideration but its for everybody's info. And yes ive sat in both cars before. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Sep 5 2012, 08:12 AM
cybermaster98
post Sep 5 2012, 08:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Sep 5 2012, 08:21 AM)
I dont say yr calculation is wrong. Dashboard configuration make it that way. But what I mean as overall either as passenger or driver, U will feel Honda Civic is cramp. U cant put much luggage. Back seat for passenger is small & not that comfortable. For me, just slightly better than Mazda 3. But less than Inspira, Focus, Elantra etc..


Added on September 5, 2012, 8:26 am
Elantra vs Civic  vs Corolla vs Cruze vs Sentra vs Focus
Passenger volume (cu. ft.) 
95.6/94.6/92.1/94.6/97.4/90.7

Cargo volume
(cu. ft.) 
14.8/12.5/12.3/15.4/13.1/13.2

Total interior volume (cu. ft.) 
110.4/102.9/104.3/110.0/110.5/103.9

US EPA size classification 
Mid-size/Compact/Compact/Mid-size/Mid-size/Compact
Bro, passenger volume is different from legroom. Volumes take into account the height of the internal roof. Im just talking about legroom meaning how far you can stretch in each car. Not comfort or luggage space.

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0441sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 12:53 PM