Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Comparing Jetta, Civic & Altis, Prefering Jetta

views
     
kcng
post Oct 18 2012, 10:27 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(Pip_X @ Oct 18 2012, 10:03 PM)
Jetta la. Ppl consider Jetta a luxury car. U will be seen as a more higher class compared to if u drive civic, altis or k5.
*
that red part is different class ok

compare apple with apple please....
ohmy.gif
kenji1903
post Oct 19 2012, 07:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,785 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(pjkl @ Oct 18 2012, 11:03 AM)
hahah dinosaur age...

if want to save fuel, then can use hybrid and more environmental friendly.
each car has pro and con. Just that individual choice. But when you see on the road beside local car, more people choose T&H, surely that is reason. If 1 people choose wrong, cannot be 10000 people choose wrong.

No offence ya, just sharing....
*
hybrid is more fuel efficient if you are stuck in the jam/stop-go conditions...
cruising wise, the car's FC is pretty much the same as any normal gasoline cars...
dtna7
post Oct 19 2012, 09:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
456 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(kenji1903 @ Oct 19 2012, 07:48 AM)
hybrid is more fuel efficient if you are stuck in the jam/stop-go conditions...
cruising wise, the car's FC is pretty much the same as any normal gasoline cars...
*
it ain't that simple bro...
i can vouch for that blush.gif
pcychen72
post Oct 20 2012, 05:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(twincharger07 @ Oct 19 2012, 12:16 AM)
i m not emphasizing on which has better fuel efficiency, i m just against your remark that turbocharged engine is much more fuel consuming..
*
thumbup.gif

The moment you owned a TC car, you will never go back to NA. TC is just good engineering.
pjkl
post Oct 20 2012, 09:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
74 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(pcychen72 @ Oct 20 2012, 05:00 PM)
thumbup.gif

The moment you owned a TC car, you will never go back to NA. TC is just good engineering.
*
It depends on cases. NA always are proven and easy to maintain. No point to speed and risk life and make family worry. Now a lot of AES and camera, waste $.
The curve got Civic road to open up eye... rclxms.gif

No offence to any1 smile.gif

twincharger07
post Oct 20 2012, 11:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,788 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(pjkl @ Oct 20 2012, 09:47 PM)
It depends on cases. NA always are proven and easy to maintain. No point to speed and risk life and make family worry. Now a lot of AES and camera, waste $.
The curve got Civic road to open up eye... rclxms.gif

No offence to any1   smile.gif
*
who says TC is for speeding... is good pick up and drive at whatever speed you wan...
wake up.. you can drive slow with a TC car and you also can speed with NA engine... who say those driving NA cars wont speed?

this is human age... dinasour age long gone bro... what you know about turbo is so yesterday..

This post has been edited by twincharger07: Oct 20 2012, 11:42 PM
lcy851031
post Oct 21 2012, 12:41 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
741 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(twincharger07 @ Oct 20 2012, 11:39 PM)
who says TC is for speeding... is good pick up and drive at whatever speed you wan...
wake up.. you can drive slow with a TC car and you also can speed with NA engine... who say those driving NA cars wont speed?

this is human age... dinasour age long gone bro... what you know about turbo is so yesterday..
*
Because people still thought turbo that can be found on those JDM big cc sports car. sweat.gif

now most of the manufacturer use low inertia turbo, to let the turbo kick in at lower rpm, so that we can get maximum torque of the engine as soon as possible. So that the engine is less stressful in pulling the car across the distance. wub.gif
Wangan
post Oct 21 2012, 03:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
84 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Lol to TC=more summons. I have more summons on my saga blm than my TC car. It depends on your foot, not the car engine. Even kancil can get summons easily if u dont discipline your right foot.
pcychen72
post Oct 21 2012, 09:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


right foot on cars, and the right wrist on kap chais.

Both my cars are TC, whether petrol or diesel. drool.gif

0 to speed limit in a much quicker time, don't need to go over speed limit to enjoy cars, people!!
T.Woods
post Oct 21 2012, 11:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


TS, jetta is a class upper ler, i have a civic. If i had the $$ i wont hesitate to get the jetta.
IluvProton
post Oct 21 2012, 11:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Jul 2009

QUOTE(theanswer @ May 7 2012, 03:43 PM)
i'd go for jetta anytime. the reason u rarely seen it on the road because it's a new car compared to altis & civic.
yep the salesman is right. just look at the jetta 1.4tsi spec sheet..u'll see the power is comparable with 2.4 n/a engine.in fact u will get better torque range 240nm from 1500-4500rpm. small engine means cheaper roadtax too.
plus jetta got rear aircond vent which civic & altis dont have.
the only downside is no leather seat for jetta. but maybe got optional package.
cheers.
*
jetta offer discount 7k rebate.

15k km only per service = regular 5k & 10k km for japanese car

power? dun believe then test drive it.

altis / civic not really good quality built compare with jetta
xiaoniu8
post Oct 27 2012, 12:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
how much VW charge to service Jetta??
kadajawi
post Oct 27 2012, 02:30 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(xiaoniu8 @ Oct 27 2012, 12:51 PM)
how much VW charge to service Jetta??
*
Probably around RM 400 for regular service. Every 15k.

Jetta and Civic same class, though the Jetta should be better than the downgraded Malaysian Civic.
IluvProton
post Oct 27 2012, 02:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Jul 2009

about 600+ for 15k km interval

should be ok since is 3 times more mileages + time saving.


teikwing
post Oct 27 2012, 07:01 PM

Dah Macan?
*******
Senior Member
3,239 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Sydney, NSW


Get to test the Jetta today at Veember OKR. One word to sums it all, brilliant. Tested the new Civic 2.0 at PJ before heading to OKR. Nothing comes close in terms of power and handling. The only upper hand I think Civic have will be the futuristic dashboard and keyless entry + Navi.

Those interested to test drive must test drive the car in S mode! Get to feel the real power and wonder of combination of TSI + DSG. smile.gif

P/S: Torque figures of 240Nm is on par with my old E46 325i. I am truly amazed. Do check out Jetta's attractive year-end discount at selected branches.

This post has been edited by teikwing: Oct 27 2012, 07:03 PM
ganz
post Oct 27 2012, 10:44 PM

Livin' Ain't No Crime
******
Senior Member
1,139 posts

Joined: Mar 2005



jetta.. no question ask..

from current altis user biggrin.gif
dtna7
post Oct 27 2012, 11:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
456 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
The 1.4TSI engine is one of the most advanced engine voted.

So advance that VW is dropping it off starting with the next gen Golf.
(rumored to be too expensive/complicated to produce)

It is 20k+ more expensive for a reason, not just for branding and show...lol
ganz
post Oct 27 2012, 11:13 PM

Livin' Ain't No Crime
******
Senior Member
1,139 posts

Joined: Mar 2005



cheaper roadtax tongue.gif
kadajawi
post Oct 28 2012, 01:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(dtna7 @ Oct 27 2012, 11:09 PM)
The 1.4TSI engine is one of the most advanced engine voted.

So advance that VW is dropping it off starting with the next gen Golf.
(rumored to be too expensive/complicated to produce)

It is 20k+ more expensive for a reason, not just for branding and show...lol
*
Really? The next generation Golf is still having a 1.4 TSI, but since the switch to the MQB platform the engines are interchangeable. The angle and position is supposed to be the same for every engine, the way it is mount etc. Same with gearbox. So they may combine every gearbox with every engine, and put it in every car based on the MQB platform (i.e. almost every car...). That might explain some changes. The 1.4 TSI loses some weight by using more aluminium, around 20 kg for the 122 hp version. It will also run as a 2 cylinder when there isn't enough load (similar to what I believe Honda did long time ago). In any case I doubt the engine will be a downgrade over the previous ones, they have just improved what was there before.

Factories that are able to produce one MQB car should be able to produce other MQB cars as well, on the same line, with some additions. So hopefully VW will set up one of these in Malaysia and offer a greater variety of cars. MQB also helps them save money, which they apparently intend to use to adapt to the pricing requirements in certain markets (such as Malaysia...?!). Of course if the cars are cheaper to produce, they can offer them for less to push other companies out of the market brows.gif

This post has been edited by kadajawi: Oct 28 2012, 01:18 PM
blurry d
post Nov 8 2012, 10:18 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


QUOTE(ganz @ Oct 27 2012, 10:44 PM)
jetta.. no question ask..

from current altis user biggrin.gif
*
I agree. There is DRLs for the Jetta just that it is not LED only.. but you can change it for like RM300 plus..

11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0270sec    1.24    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 07:22 PM