QUOTE(freakfingers12 @ May 7 2012, 02:13 AM)
The only variable is Android version. Hmmm...Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V2, Baronic : THREAD IS HEAVILY MODERATED
Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V2, Baronic : THREAD IS HEAVILY MODERATED
|
|
May 7 2012, 02:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(waveweaver @ May 7 2012, 08:38 AM) If by official means you can only get half baked ICS then by using custom roms, maximum you can get is suku masak..!! Cyanogen can never fully utilised ICS no matter what. There are bound to be something not working. Have tried CM on both SGS and SGS2 before and both times the result was the same. Of course utilization won't be 100% like what original ROM can provide. Cone to think of it, I have no complain on Teamhacksung's CM9. Aside from the obvious 3g video call won't work and it doesn't come with FM Radio app (a friendly forummer suggested a workable FM Radio app, but I never managed to configure it to work for my CM9).But still..better ada than takde langsung :-)) Anyway... what i really meant was hardware limitations and NOT firmware limitations :-P That about all that doesn't work for the custom ROM. Which I believe is a very good trade against full working but not quite workable original ROM. Why I said like that? Because stock ROM lags like hell in less than 1 month down the road. People with SGS + WhatsApp would understand the pain. Even with ext4 lag fix, it doesn't fix the problem. Not to mention it take ages to load the camera app. Too many to write here. Anyway, no point complaining as I don't have the phone anymore. Those that flashed to Value Pack, did they fixed the lag? PS: I bet the hardware limitation that Sammy mentioned was to run their bloated TW. This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 7 2012, 09:00 AM |
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ramz @ May 7 2012, 09:44 AM) yeah smart stay is genius should be standard from now on.the copy and paste of words/sentences from one screen to another should also be standard like how the pc works. why phone still cannot do as a standard. right now it depends on the app, and not yet at OS level (meaning across all applications). is copy and paste feature in S3 now a standard? Care to elaborate? Doesnt the standard Android supports this feature out of the box?This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 7 2012, 12:30 PM |
|
|
May 7 2012, 11:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ramz @ May 7 2012, 10:04 AM) certain 3rd party apps for example whatsapp(well, u can't copy a word, you have to copy the whole message), youtube, tasklist etc...you can't select, copy paste like u normally do in pc. should be all text base display can select, copy, paste as a standard. in pc, u take for granted every text can copy and paste no matter what application u are in. I think firstly, you have to find out whether the text displayed is in a textbox (has to be selectable) or on a label (non-selectable). If both textbox non-selectable and label, most likely you can't copy.p.s i just realized most native apps can. but 3rd party not so consistent Similarly to Windows, there's no way to copy a single text on a label control, if you know what I mean. And you are right, it's on the app itself, whether developer choose to have it as textbox without border and blended in background colour, or the more easy way, just by using label. But there are also other complication in using textbox, which is why label is more favourable. |
|
|
May 7 2012, 12:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ramz @ May 7 2012, 12:13 PM) i understand what u saying. I can only speak from Windows application program point of view as I code programs in Windows environment. There's always a dilemma in finishing a program quick or giving more features to users with the compromise of extra time, probable bugs and other complications.for certain things it depends on developer. if developer gatal put a text as picture, then too bad. but my question is why is there so many instances the developer don't allow us to copy text. is quite prevalent in 3rd party apps. for example. in youtube.com for pc the text that people write are all copy-able. but in the youtube app in android, it is not. wtf? where is the quality control here. for certain things maybe is the OS itself. this one i not sure. Anyway, I have no complains so far, just accept it as it is. Even Talk doesn't allow us to copy the text conversation. Press and hold, nothing happens. There's still way to copy the text using Object Inspector tools in Windows, but it's extra steps and trouble to just get the text. It's quite similar to the Accessibility Read-Aloud function provided in Android, if you know what I mean. Added on May 7, 2012, 12:50 pm QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 7 2012, 12:13 PM) Are you using a grey One X? They both uses the same material - polycarbonate. The glossy look on SIII is due to "hyperglaze" finishing which Samsung claims is scratch resistant as well My Oakleys are also PC material with "scratch resistant" finishing.Just take my advice, don't hold your breath on it. Added on May 7, 2012, 12:53 pm QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 7 2012, 12:40 PM) That's probably the reason HTC goes rubber with the grey One X. Maybe the blue SIII will attract more fingerprints HOX supporters probably gonna flame me, but the kind of rubbery finish, you get that a lot on Microsoft mice.after 1/2 year or longer, you'll know what happen la next. The reason why I never chose the black Tab10.1. This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 7 2012, 12:54 PM |
|
|
May 7 2012, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 7 2012, 12:55 PM) Yeah, too bad I can't use a case for my Oakley. To those that not gonna use any case, after 3 months of usage, try to put the device under bright light and look at it from sharp angle. Check out those tiny little hairline scratches. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(tashfinsheikh @ May 7 2012, 01:17 PM) Samsung Galaxy S3 accessories – Wireless Charging kit That's a dock. Wireless charging has no gambar yet. Wireless charging is one of the standout features of the Galaxy S3. Samsung’s done away with chunky after-market charging cases and delivered this kit, consisting of specially-designed replacement back for the phone that incorporates all the necessary tech, plus a wireless charging pad. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Source |
|
|
May 7 2012, 01:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 01:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(nothing_nth @ May 7 2012, 01:31 PM) not a valid argument... since beats can b implement in custom rom Agree, 20 shots are more than enough if you are only picking 1. Unless you wanna do some stop motion like animation, then 99 shots would be sweet.S3 also offer same thing in camera recording n burst... jz that only take up to 20 pics... IMO 99 pic kinda over... i used my fren's hox... I didnt even bother scroll all... jz choose the best from it Added on May 7, 2012, 1:37 pm QUOTE(tashfinsheikh @ May 7 2012, 01:33 PM) Nonetheless, it's a closer step to the future. Added on May 7, 2012, 1:38 pm QUOTE(tashfinsheikh @ May 7 2012, 01:33 PM) They're AI la, of course would only understand proper english If it's true wireless charging kit, just lay the phone onto the charging pad. The picture included was just the docking for the description below it. Added on May 7, 2012, 1:34 pm It is wireless charging kit , no ? Added on May 7, 2012, 1:39 pm QUOTE(Superman7 @ May 7 2012, 01:35 PM) Yup, and also someone took it to mod their SGS to enable this capability. Sweet!This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 7 2012, 01:39 PM |
|
|
May 7 2012, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 7 2012, 01:41 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Full view » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « S1 is also using Wolfson What is Wolfson before SGS? No idea. Did the Samsung Unpacked emphasized on Wolfson? Didn't pay much attention there. |
|
|
May 7 2012, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(garytey @ May 7 2012, 03:11 PM) sigh.. then that's a gg, I never have my 3g video call feature back after I flash custom rom with my SGS, correct me if i'm wrong Look at it from the bright side. Maybe TW is so nice now that you wont want any other custom ROM that are not based off TW?Added on May 7, 2012, 3:12 pm that's my worry, a lot of rom not based on TW |
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ May 7 2012, 03:25 PM) Err...duo core essential like??? In everyday usage, there is no performance difference...only difference is because of better GPU, not the CPU. Check out the One-V...single core...smooth like butter (thanks to ICS also). Even SGS2 and SGS1...not much difference either. Ahem... not quite. I have had a taste of a "seasoned" unit. You'd wished you didn't have it.Anyway, extra cores are good. 2 cores are sufficient, but 4 cores are just sweeeeet. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Some of you might like this... it's voting time!
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/05/06/we...g-galaxy-s-iii/ |
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ May 7 2012, 03:41 PM) You put in 200 apps, what phone also die. So again, nothing to do with cores. SGS1 is fast enough for everyday usage, that's the keyword. Laggin in Android occasionally is a given, no amount of cores will help unless Google rewrite their code from scratch. Live with it. Frankly, S2 non-G is bloody smooth. I can't call it lag even. Yup, with plenty of apps and some spyware like apps that pops up advert once a while the kind.The extra cores would help in loading apps into memory, will greatly shorten the time requires to read from memory and database access. |
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ May 7 2012, 03:44 PM) How many times need to argue? https://www.google.com.my/search?q=samsung+...UJ4XyrQeMzunnAQ 9.3 million results "Samsung i9100 hangs". You go read one by one...i've no time... Added on May 7, 2012, 3:45 pm Which eye you see i use crack apps? Left or right? I have 2 SGS2 btw, 1 G Tab 7.7 and a Samsung Bada. And i don't use crack apps FYI. QUOTE For Samsung i9100 Leather Hang Case products, buy For Samsung ... I guess this is part of phone hanging too? |
|
|
May 7 2012, 03:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(farscope @ May 7 2012, 03:54 PM) voted.. Producer asked to cover, so they cover la... half pail.just now listen to BFM's comments on s3 and the things that he said i felt pretty bias as he didn't spend time to fully understand the phone like us and comment based on reviews online and comments online. i listen liao i oso :facepalmed: |
|
|
May 7 2012, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(waveweaver @ May 7 2012, 04:00 PM) Just let it be. The most important thing is you satisfied with the phone yourself. And the phone should atleast meet 80% of your daily requirement/needs. What others say good doesn't mean it must be also good for you. And vice versa :-)) It will definitely meet 180% of most people's need.You only need a phone that can make calls, and extra would be send SMS. You don't really NEED to online all the time, right? lol. |
|
|
May 7 2012, 08:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,963 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0684sec
0.40
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:04 AM |