This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 8 2012, 12:07 PM
Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V2, Baronic : THREAD IS HEAVILY MODERATED
Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V2, Baronic : THREAD IS HEAVILY MODERATED
|
|
May 8 2012, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
^ if not because of the kind of attractive titles, you wouldn't have clicked it, would you?
This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 8 2012, 12:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 03:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Sky.Live @ May 8 2012, 02:45 PM) Yes it's smaller aperture lens is expensive, but there's other thing to look after too, This has got to do with reducing purple fringing due to wide angle lens. But this is a whole other topic which is not related to small sized sensor and narrow FOV like those on phone's camera.leica f1.8 and canon f1.8 lens for example it's not always better. Also we would not want to use large aperture lens to shoot scenery as less DOF meaning some part would be blurred out.. In a camera phone, where the sensor is puny tiny small, there's not much use of having a big aperture. btw sensor is sensor, aperture is aperture.. then there's shuttle speed and ISO, which is the triangle rules of determining how good your photographs with turn out.. skill and composition .. Repeat after me: shutter, shutter, shutter. Shuttle is a transportation. Added on May 8, 2012, 3:30 pmSensor size for S3's camera and this author hates iPhone? lol http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-out...tphones_id27370 Added on May 8, 2012, 3:31 pm QUOTE(farscope @ May 8 2012, 02:55 PM) theoretically yes. Galaxy S already using a 5mp BSI sensor, I believe S2 did as well.actually any number below f2.8 is adequate for low light shooting, but of course, the smaller the better for the f-number. in respond to your question. It will assist the s3 to perform better in low light when compared to non-BSI sensor like s2. but head to head comparing with other BSI smart phone cameras like the iphone 4S, Xperia S and the HOX, then we will need actually sample pictures to see how well it performs. This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 8 2012, 03:31 PM |
|
|
May 8 2012, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(farscope @ May 8 2012, 03:35 PM) o rly? y Samsung didn't mention anything about it. At least the product code was right? -- S5K3H7If that's the case, then it explains y HOX is using the same sensor as s2. Added on May 8, 2012, 3:37 pm the article is posted on Feb.. This is regarding S2's BSI sensor: http://www.i-micronews.com/reports/Samsung...a-Module/8/281/ I can't verify if they are genuine, sometimes you just have to take it if you are not the 1 to pry open the device. |
|
|
May 8 2012, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(garytey @ May 8 2012, 03:44 PM) really, no wonder I always feel my S1 response well during low light capture especially with stock camera... It was quite a good sensor for low light. I find it better than GNex's even.I have yet to find the article that stated it's BSI sensor. Wait until I get it. I found a lot of HTC One X vs Galaxy S (I9000) comparison though. |
|
|
May 8 2012, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Leong Ka Fai @ May 8 2012, 03:56 PM) the only thing i think is better on the One X is the screen and design... Thats all... not even Sense UI attracts me... I always prefer TouchWiz over Sense... My advice to you, try out Galaxy Nexus / Note at Samsung showroom. Count the pixels if you want. Then you might change your mind.I can live wit the s3 design actually... the only thing is the screen i would say i really favour the One X much more... Hopefully its not as bad as I think it would... Using the TI OMAP S2G currently, would like to try out the Exynos chipset... din like my Tegra 2 Xoom, and is one of my reason not going to the Tegra 3 One X.... Magnifying glass disqualify. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 04:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Leong Ka Fai @ May 8 2012, 04:06 PM) the S2 did well in both of these and I believe S3 shud be better perhaps ???? Sifus here any advise whether I am on the right track... but not taking Note as an option because it is really not pocketable enuf for me... If you are satisfied with S2, trust me, you will with S3 as well. Pentile is not visible by looking at it with naked eye. I can testify this as I'm currently using GNex. forgot to add another plus point for One X... the Capative buttons and with the multitask button.. i love those... but i can see its hard to pressed as in the accuracy of getting it hit is low... always see reviewers having tough time pressing it LOL... Hold Home button to call up the task listing. Added on May 8, 2012, 4:50 pm QUOTE(Kevin_Low @ May 8 2012, 04:39 PM) You also have not mention about 8.6mm thicker than s2 8.5mm. lol Can I assume that you have already looked at GNex's display thoroughly?This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 8 2012, 04:50 PM |
|
|
May 9 2012, 12:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 8 2012, 11:44 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This was posted back in Thread v1 if I'm not mistaken |
|
|
May 9 2012, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 9 2012, 07:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(silrave @ May 9 2012, 03:23 AM) His hand is gargantuan!Never show the boot up of the device. AccuWeather apps was said to have some bugs/compromise location privacy back in S2's time. I wonder why they still include it in S3. |
|
|
May 9 2012, 06:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ken2291 @ May 9 2012, 01:17 PM) This is on S2's one, doesn't sound like S3's one. |
|
|
May 10 2012, 01:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 10 2012, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(wayfeel @ May 10 2012, 11:54 AM) holy crap, you'll love the share shot I hope this is patented to stop Apple from stealing.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SmxJo4gvSA...mbedded#t=2m36s say, in a party or function, all ur 3 frens hv s3, each one shoot 2 pic, everyone go home having the same 6 pictures when u connect thru direct wifi without the need of wifi around..aint that cool? i think sammy is masterminding a global invasion, therefore the crazy targeted 200million sales lol einstein was also crazy right ? lol Added on May 10, 2012, 1:40 pm QUOTE(disasternero @ May 10 2012, 12:56 PM) iPhone can't even share files via BT, let alone using Wifi Direct.This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 10 2012, 01:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 2012, 01:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
-deleted-
This post has been edited by Harddisk: May 13 2012, 01:20 AM |
|
|
May 13 2012, 01:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(XeactorZ @ May 13 2012, 01:21 AM) but if not mistaken the phone need to put above the wireless charging kit I didn't read it properly. Description said it can charge up to 2 devices at 1 go.not sure ya haha, I wonder can charge other phone or not @@ and dunno how it work also bluetooth, NFC ?? furthermore, is it must put the phone above / near the wireless charging kit to charge the phone ? if not get powerbank better, lol Wireless charging is basically like those electric toothbrush. If you have 1, you'll understand why and probably how it works. Shouldn't have anything to do with NFC, but it doesn't negate the idea that power might comes through the NFC antenna (coils?). *shrug* But if can charge up to 2 devices at 1 go, it's good to go! |
|
|
May 13 2012, 02:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
May 13 2012, 02:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(jetpacker @ May 13 2012, 02:17 AM) actually what is the point of having wireless charging if the phone still need to put on the dock (or whatever you called it)..since the phone can only be charged when it is on the dock, might as well use normal cable to charge, as we still can move the phone around within the cable distance... There are a few advantages of having wireless charging over cable:if the wireless charging concept is something like wifi..then we will talk 1) charge without connecting the cable. Sometimes it's kinda difficult to get it in if you are not looking. Especially if you are using cases where it has protector rubber plugs that goes into the usb port on the phone. 2) You can reserve the cable for data transfer/adb related stuff when connected to your phone. Not sure if it would speed up the charging though. 3) usb connector at the bottom of the phone is quite inconvenient, at least for me. I have to use my phone rotated 180 deg. With wireless charging, I can have my phone laid flat in any orientation. 4) no more unplugging the cable if there is incoming call and your charging cable was not long enough. Just pick it up off the charging pad and answer. Put it back and it charges again. How convenient is that? |
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,959 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
^ Malaysia should be getting the international version, GT-I9300 as usual.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0541sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 02:16 PM |