What s2peMocls and Tyler_Durden - and even you - fail to realize is that this behaviour is not unique to women. Men behave this way too. I've seen my guy friends upset for various reasons and unwilling to talk about it. I've seen them prefer to indulge their hurt and resentment rather than open up to the person who made them hurt and resentful. I've been like this. And I bet so have you - all of you.

You're not analysing, you're extrapolating.

Again, you're displaying solipsism. Her withholding sex is punishing my behavior of "demanding" make up sex. This pretty much renders the rest of your extrapolation invalid. And why would I demand make up sex when I'm not even asking for forgiveness? This proves that you don't even understand simply dynamics of relationship and you're just grabbing straws.

Faulty extrapolation on your part implying you know how to apply to the situation, or that you know me well, which you obviously don't in both instances.

For a moment I thought you'd have some fibre of rationality, but nope, you're just making up crap pretending to understand simple concepts, but actually not, and acting like you the intimate lives of others so you can level personal attacks while at the same time be devoid of substance. It is so pathetic of you, as usual.

---

Added on December 9, 2012, 6:59 pmAnd your guy friends constitute the majority of men ya?

Anyways, is it your understanding that the GF 's source of grief is the BF, thus she pulled the long face at him when he asked "How are you?" Because your explanation certainly sounds like it.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Dec 9 2012, 06:59 PM

Doesn't matter who the source of grief is. Being upset, and being unwilling or unable to articulate that feeling, is an entirely human attitude and not specific to men or women.

If you're trying to imply that you have never felt that way, well... you are exactly as un-self-aware as I thought.

The rest are crap loads of denial statement that proves your inability for self-reflection. I will just focus on this one.
You DEMAND MAKE UP SEX so that you forgives her. It's never a bargain for a guy to offer sex in return for forgiveness. Women don't need them like how you do.
Of course, since you never reflect on your action. You never realize what an @ss you have been.

The source of grief matters. You are equating avoiding conflict with creating conflict. Unwilling and unable are VERY different things. Being unable to articulate feelings is NOT human attitude.
Pfft... I've been articulating my feelings ever since I was born. Howevever, as a young boy, I was very quickly told not to. But I've not even once made it such that it becomes someone else's burden to open up my emotional faucet, and giving him/her a difficult time at it. Women on the other hand, had been encourage to express their feelings, and this is how they do it?

Grow up.

---

Added on December 9, 2012, 7:33 pmWOW... I demand make up sex to forgive her? Hahah, you're a freaking idiot, I'd have make up sex AFTER I've forgiven her. If I had to forgive her after I had sex with her, then it's just no longer make up sex, it's power sex ya moron. BTW, didn't I already tell you your extrapolation is FAULTY?? Yet you keep head butting that issue as if you're oblivious to how flawed your "logic" is.

Talk about self reflection. LOL!! Look, if you don't understand relationship dynamics, quit pretending like you do, you're just giving me ammo to make you look like the ignorant idiot that you are.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Dec 9 2012, 07:44 PM

And once again, you turn the topic to a screed against women?

Good Lord, you're like a button labelled "Press For Misogyny."

While I find women "confusing", you are downright lost.

Someone said women are "complicated", I explained the situation, then someone idiot came in and said "derp di derp women are confusing because.." supplementing a conversation manginas can relate to. So I said "this is how I will handle it", then you responded to the derp guy buy saying "NAWALT and it's not just women", I disagree and I turned the topic against women?

WTF?????

Oh yeah, one more thing. So your retort is basically "I've got no substance so I'll just call you a misogynist, I think I will win the argument that way" LOL.

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Dec 9 2012, 07:49 PM

Think like an @sshole. Behaves like an @sshole. Definitely looking like an @sshole.
I'm just enjoying looking at what type of @sshole you can project yourself to be. Go on, keep telling yourself your are not.

So like n00b13, you're just going below the belt even though you had implicitly expressed you really ARE clueless about relationship dynamics. Good going. Come back when you've gained some experienced and reached like.... level 2.

Not really. The best way is to ignore their tantrums, just as you don't reward children when they're throwing tantrums for not giving them their toys.

Because all women are children and you are their father? Does that make you a pedophile?

You got wha whaatt? Level 25? If learning "relationship dynamics" like you did will degrade my intelligence to your, level 0. I rather stay at level 0 in relationship dynamics. At least I keep my intelligence and common sense.

Yes, the kind of intelligence that think impotence and emasculation to be different things, and make up sex and power sex to be the same things. And the kind of common sense that says "hey that is the wrong way, but I'm going to go there anyway".

Real champ. Women must be tripping over themselves and ditching their men for you, you wonderful white knight you...

This post has been edited by s2peMocls: Dec 9 2012, 08:14 PM

That's what a Level 25 "relationship dynamic" hero does. Twisting and putting words into others mouth as their ultimate skill to champion his extremely hilarious idiotic ideology. What i'm more interested to see is if there is any other stupid ideology coming from level 25 "relationship dynamic" hero like you. Maybe it get even more funny when you got urself upgraded to level 26. Couldn't be more excited.

This post has been edited by RUI: Dec 9 2012, 08:25 PM

Yes, I'm totally putting words you did not say in your mouth ya?

quote=RUI,Dec 5 2012, 04:48 PM
You do sounded like both impotent and emasculated.

quote=RUI,Dec 6 2012, 12:49 PM
I admit. I never know any of these adjectives.

Second one does sound a lot like an admission rather than sarcasm

Oh yeah, you completely ignored the explanation on how I got to this conclusion. Why not you quote that too?
Oppps...Another killer skill a level 25 "Relationship dynamics"(Idiot) hero has... How could I not know that?

QUOTE(s2peMocls @ Dec 9 2012, 08:39 PM)

I'm not a buffoon like you do.
That explains my ignorance on adjective to describe a buffoon like you.
Catch the sarcasm yet?

This post has been edited by RUI: Dec 9 2012, 08:51 PM

What? NOW you want to defend yourself? Hahahah. You pick a completely random and irrelevant quote and then you mix up you vocab, and then a few threads later you're like "You're out of context!!" while in between you had committed similar comprehension errors. Anyway, thanks to you I've got plenty of ammo to shoot you down with, and they're not made up of stalker-style personal insults

Since your twisted head brought the discussion to Pluto. I find no reason to continue the discussion with any logic. To deal with those beyond reasoned; one will have to be unreasonable themselves.
Of course, if you are talking from Pluto, you can even "nuke" me if you want to.

Yes, in your head that kind of personal insult makes much more sense than real world social dynamics