QUOTE(poolcarpet @ Jul 9 2012, 08:17 PM)
has anyone tried mounting canon EFS lenses (e.g. cheapo legendary 50mm F1.8) onto the NEX 5N/F3 and do manual focus with the focus peaking feature? if that is possible, it is another good option instead of the expensive sony 50mm 1.8.
update: fuh... anyone here tried something like that?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=41772022for the price of the sony 50mm 1.8, you can get a canon 50mm 1.4 and do manual focus!

hi there, after i tried on some legacy lens... seriously, learn how to use manual focus...
this is where u can learn... with the peaking, it is really useful for newbie like me to learn how to manual focus...
one i must mentioned is legacy lens is made to last and unlike plastic lens nowadays... i love to auto focus n refrain from manual focus, but recently i invest an amount and try it out... damn!!! i'm poison-ed and really addicted to manual focus ad...
if u r really going for legacy lens, try brands other than canon... i believe there is much more choices... at the 70's-80's, minolta, cz, olympus zuiko also give delicious photo

Added on July 10, 2012, 12:23 amQUOTE(samsungfreak @ Jul 9 2012, 08:12 PM)
I have a Nex 5N and 18-55. Until today I still think is the the best "value for money" mirrorless combo, it is giving ur APS-C image quality on such a small form factor. On my last trip I ask my mum to take it for his shoot. You know old people are noob on camera and they don't even understand how to half press to pre focus or things like focus and recompose. So everything have to be auto. The pictures come back all sharp without misfocus (as long as the subject is not at the corner/border when the background will be in focus). Old people also like to print and the prints are just amazing and have all the SLR look. [I am referring to image quality, nor artistic value, lol]
When you use 18-55 at 18mm, you can use f3.5. If you buy 19mm, you can use f2.8. The difference is only 2/3 step, other than smaller size, there is really not much benefit.
If you buy the 30mm, it is effectively a 45mm view on Full Frame camera. That is quite an interesting view. And if you shoot 30mm with 18-55 you probably are now at f4 something which means now this lens can really give you more than 1 stop advantage in both low light and bokeh (background blur). So this look more interesting. But for me, it is still not interesting enough.
The 50mm is very interesting. It can shoot wide open and still get very sharp results [but not on Nex 7 which the megapixels outresolved the lens capability]. The 1.8 will give very good bokeh when needed and quite a good low light performer compare to the sigmas. It will be a good match for 18-55 because the 50 of 18-55 will need to be shot at near f5.6, you can getting 3 stop advantage! Also while not related, the silver lens look more cool then the black sigmas.

Please don't sell the 18-55, you can't get much for selling it and it is really value for the money.
zoom lens is born for versatility... just like some ppl new to camera, the first thing they will ask is the pixel offered by the cam, the next will be how much it can zoom...
but if for bokeh effect wise, prime lens rule... anyway, i agree with samsungfreak... u nvr know when u will use 18-55 but i always stick with my prime lens now...
This post has been edited by geek8585: Jul 10 2012, 12:23 AM