Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Short Review on the Exora Bold

views
     
V12Kompressor
post Dec 17 2011, 12:48 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


Those SA who knows nothing doesn't have the initiative to korek info themselves. Keep on rely from Proton punya Sales Training slides only. sleep.gif
V12Kompressor
post Dec 17 2011, 06:39 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(mutt @ Dec 17 2011, 05:35 PM)
how come johor branch got the brochure already? I went to proton 3s at glenmarie. The nearest center from coe mad.gif
*
lol, means that proton edar owner connection not kuat. tongue.gif

the showroom I tested, not only provides food, but also brochure and even READY STOCK! shocking.gif
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 10:46 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(ben3085 @ Dec 18 2011, 10:42 PM)

On topic please, so will i guess Perodua will come out something in return to match against the Exora Bold.
*
No, they dont.

Toyota will never approve a Daihatsu/Perodua which will compete with their own Innova.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 11:00 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(dares @ Dec 18 2011, 10:50 PM)
I always wondered how P2 got greenlit the Alza since it was in the same price range as Avanza.
*
Because in Japan there's no Avanza but there's Passo Sette/Sirion Luminas so Perodua have the reason to assemble it here as Alza.

Avanza is part of Toyota IMV project which never include Japan as their market preference.

This post has been edited by V12Kompressor: Dec 18 2011, 11:01 PM
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 11:15 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


hahahaa... Perodua will NEVER create a new model from scratch. lol
They dont have that capability and even if they can, sushi people will say no.

Take a glace over Perodua and Toyota's vehicle line up and you'll know how Toyota earns money with the Myvi via Daihatsu JV at Perodua and at the same time how they protect their own interest in the Malaysia market.

Even the upcoming Avanza is going more "upmarket" and the price is at least RM10k more expensive than the Alza.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 11:22 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(dares @ Dec 18 2011, 11:15 PM)
But what about the local market? from Toyota's POV there was no need to bring in those models since there already was Avanza here. Even though it is sold under a different brand name, isn't it pitting their own product against each other?
*
When the Alza was intoduced to the malaysian market, the Avanza is already a very very old product. Sales is diminishing and gets hit harder when Nissan launched the Grand Livina. Toyota knew they couldn't and won't get the new Avanza replaced in time since they need to refresh the big three IMVs first since these are more important (Innova, Hilux & Fortuner) and therefore they greenlit Perodua to assemble it here.

Furthermore, the Alza was introduced when the general MPV (below RM 100k) frenzy hits the market with the launch of Grand Livina, Exora CPS and also the refreshed Chery Eastar. Not to mention that time Naza was busy dumping off the Citra at dirt cheap price.

This post has been edited by V12Kompressor: Dec 18 2011, 11:23 PM
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 11:49 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(kadajawi @ Dec 18 2011, 11:36 PM)
But why didn't they release the Avanza as a Perodua in the first place? Apart from them having to assemble it here in that case... The Alza is the better product, at a lower price.

I also wonder why brands like Renault and Citroen gave up the Malaysian market... the 7 seater Kangoo could easily compete with the Avanza (except for the badge), though it was more expensive back then. IIRC the Kangoo was around 70k, i.e. Alza and Exora money. The new versions of these models (almost every continental manufacturer has a Kangoo-like car... Ford, Opel, Renault, Citroen, Peugeot, Fiat, VW, for a while Mercedes, and Toyota had the more consumer oriented Sienta) have all been vastly improved and grew in size. As they are perceived as panel vans by the population they might not get taxed as high as a continental 7 seater van.
*
One solid reason is before the Myvi exist, Perodua is supposedly only to assemble hatchbacks (Kelisa, Kenari, Kancil) only.

Another reason is due to the Innova has moved upmarket and there is a need to address the Unser owners and potential MPV buyers who couldn't afford an Innova, hence Toyota need a new lower cost MPV to retain back these old Unser customers. Back then on 2003, there are hardly any brand in Malaysian market which sells MPV.

The Citroen Berlingo, Peugeot Partner and Renault Kangoo wasn't a great hit due to the Malaysian market which are generally a bunch of skeptics towards French vehicles.

This post has been edited by V12Kompressor: Dec 18 2011, 11:49 PM
V12Kompressor
post Dec 18 2011, 11:57 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(ben3085 @ Dec 18 2011, 11:50 PM)
Well, since most of you saying that is not going to happen than let it be, so Perodua will not make an improved version of the Alza and they are doom to the same boring model till the end of their lives.

Plus i did mention i am guessing/ only that Perodua may come out with a model to compete with the Exora. So my guess is wrong and do i get a banned from this?
*
No, you wont be banned because of this, lol. These are merely a conversation of changing and sharing opinion. A little debate is healthy. No need to feel bad about it.

I am no Toyota insider nor Perodua employee. I am just a teenager enjoying his final 22nd year. The reason I could cook up all these cock and bull stories is due to my exposure to the automotive world since 10 years ago. What I'm saying is all based from experience and also a bit of data analysis. I dare not say my theories here are 100% true, but I dare to say that it is 100% making sense.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 19 2011, 12:03 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(kadajawi @ Dec 19 2011, 12:01 AM)
I wish there was a commenting feature though... there are plenty of MPVs the size of an Exora with 1.6L engines... Ford Galaxy (4.8m) is available as a 1.6 with 160 hp and a 1.6 diesel with 115 hp (driven that one, enough power already for such a big car... it's not a sports car after all). The Ford S-Max has the same 1.6L engine. The VW Sharan/Seat Alhambra (4.85m) has a 1.4 with 150 hp. Opel Zafira (4.66m) has a 1.4 with 120 or 140 hp (and a 1.8 with 115... lol).
So Proton joins a nice group of cars with the Exora, though 138 hp from a 1.6 is not as extreme as what some others do.
*
For the second time, please stop making a comparison with the models you get at Germany.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 19 2011, 01:24 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


BTW, there's another feature on this car which I will find most people who went for the test drive tend to overlook;

there is a built in buzzer that will buzz when you forgot to turn off the headlights after you switched off the engine. Good for wimminz drivers. tongue.gif

and the door lock button will not lock the doors when one of the doors is still ajar.

V12Kompressor
post Dec 19 2011, 01:36 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(neo1point3 @ Dec 19 2011, 01:31 PM)
This one my previous 1991 saga aeroback also got lah brader  tongue.gif
*
but this feature somehow "died" after numerous cost cutting measures deployed by those Mahathir's maggots. Now it is back. thumbup.gif
V12Kompressor
post Dec 20 2011, 02:37 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(kochin @ Dec 20 2011, 10:06 AM)
can anybody recommend me the best place to get exora bold premium?
best place as in offering the best, biggest discount and super duper highest trade in for an old junk.
thanks.

PS: within klang valley lah of course. kindly PM me instead of posting here.
*
new model dont think got discounts. Even free gifts is quite limited.

I have lobang for ready stock BTW.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 21 2011, 12:23 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(xiphone4 @ Dec 21 2011, 12:02 AM)
I thought Germany car road tax based on horse power and not engine cc?
I don't know 10 years ago I worked in Germany and I was told by local engineer.
*
10 years ago diesel road tax is more expensive than the equivalent displacement petrol road tax.

10 years is a long time. A lot of things changed during the period.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 22 2011, 01:17 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(turbocharged @ Dec 22 2011, 12:26 AM)
i think can engage manual shift(if there is any) to actually try the acceleration
*
there isn't any

and the best way to get the best 0-100 timing is to slot it into D and step it to 4,000 rpm all the way.
V12Kompressor
post Dec 22 2011, 01:42 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(mat79 @ Dec 22 2011, 01:36 AM)
that is one advantage of cvt where no other gearbox has that, its like overboost mode.
*
wad?
V12Kompressor
post Dec 22 2011, 02:42 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(mat79 @ Dec 22 2011, 01:26 AM)
to get best 0-100 timing is not to engage D, but engage L mode.

L mode is actually sport drive@ sometimes referring to low gearing, L in cvt is not the same as L in at. In mitsu cvt, some use L,some use S letter, n in previous mini cooper n bmw, they used SD to replace L.

In L mode, the engine will rev up 20% higher that D mode, so u will achieve high torque earlier than than  D mode, example in D, u rev at 1700 rpm, then slot L, with the same throttle applied, the rev will climb to 2040 rpm which is where 205nm of torque already available. If in the mode,@ 1700rpm, the torque is around 150-160nm if i not mistaken.
*
In the previous gen Honda City there's D, S and L. How you explain that? S = rev 20% higher and L rev 50% higher?

The marvel of CVT is that each and every rpm it has its own respective maximum speed in both L and D mode. When you slot it into "L" mode, automatically the TCU will set the shortest ratio to propel the car forward. Even the most torque available between 2,000-4,000 rpm will be useless because the speed has been capped by the short gear ratio. By the time you floor the throttle, which should bring the rpm to 5,750 rpm, the whole car will no longer go any further faster due to the diminished horsepower. Torque is important for acceleration, but top speed is determined by horsepower. And even if it has the sufficient hp to propel the car to 100kph in L mode @ 5,750 rpm, it will still be slow due to the diminished torque at 5,750 rpm.

QUOTE(mat79 @ Dec 22 2011, 01:42 AM)

Added on December 22, 2011, 1:48 ami mentioned its like overboost, not really overboost, it is based on gbox, not engine. Others that has overboost function like mini cooper s, but it is on the engine, overboost the turbine, so that u get higher torque than standard engine offering but temporarily.
But the objective is nearly the same, to reach higher torque as earlier than normal drive mode, only that, in cvt, it doesnt increase the figure output, but u get to max torque earlier than normal drive.
Hope u understand that, but remember, engaging L will incurr higher fc than normal D mode, of course, u need to trade off extra power with fc :-). The best thing, it is not temporarily like mini overboost function.


The advantage of CVT has is that it could adjust its ratio according to the rpm of the engine so that the power produced will be put into a full good use efficiently. Ultimately, it was the driver who get to choose which rpm he wish to travel on, and to get to the max torque early, firstly the driver need to know the "sweet pot" of the engine and in the case of Exora Bold, it is between 2,000-4,000rpm since this is the rpm zone which produce the most torque (205Nm). Then there's the right throttle level to apply in order to reach the optimum rpm in the shortest time as possible. Get these two things right and you get your desired max torque early.

This is not overboost or what ever boost it is. The CVT doesn't alter the torque produced by the engine. It just part of the process in getting use to CVT and how one should operate CVT efficiently.


V12Kompressor
post Dec 22 2011, 08:51 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(mat79 @ Dec 22 2011, 04:26 AM)
yup,it doesnt alter the torque curve, but it does increase the rpm due to not Shorter, but lower ratio. U can achieve its faster, i mean the time to achieve is faster by the same throttle input. I refer to prtn@punch cvt, n the old one was used in mini n bmw when it was still under zf. The characteristic is like that, u can check official documentations from zf@mini cooper.
Cvt vt2 in flx n vt3 in exora bold cfe is the upgrade cvt from cvt vt1f which sharing the same system n characteristic but plus enhancement on pwr n torque output n also reliability.

About old honda city cvt, u can search from honda since it is honda made the cvt, not punch@zf, n we are talking bout cvt in bold.

I said that u can achieve better timing in 0-100kmh, not the top speed. At which hp n torque by rpm u can achieve 100kmh? Is it 5750 rpm?
Actually no need pedal to metal, just  floor at 4k rpm, enough coz this is cvt, not manual or at that u need to pedal to metal reaching the peak hp before shifting to the next gear.

By the way, the peak hp for cfe is @5k rpm, n if u rev beyond it, u r overrevving it. I think @5k rpm already give u around 185kmh+-, no need to speed more than that on the road i believe

If u find it hard to find the document for vt1f@vt2@vt3 , u can go to other blog in the internet where they already provide the document n discuss it.

I just call it LIKE over boost coz it give u the boost than D mode@more pickup. Like i said, try out urself. Applied the same throttle input in D mode, switch to L.  if u have flx, try this out, maintain the rev at 3.5k rpm, switch to L, it will jump nearly 4k rpm which the peak torque already available, but with the same throttle input.

It actually stated in cvt vt1f documentation about what i explained. And the figure 20% is from the document. Happy browsing other blog n reading the document.

Anyway, sharing some info on punch@prtn cvt coz i believe not many bother to search for it, not for argument.

If u read what i said earlier, i just call it overboost (not the real term, but just used to word to describe it) coz it boosted the power(not changing the torque or powerband), it is not really overboost, or maybe just call it sport drive, are u agree with that term?if not, then shud blame bmw n mini coz calling it sport drive.

N never mention it altering any torque curve or adding any torque to the original output. I just mention, when u floor 1700rpm in D mode, when u shift to L, it will increase the rev to 2k rpm, this is for explaination purpose only on 20% increase of rev.

They r those on flx already try out going up to genting.

If cannot find it, just go to www.funtastickodesign.wordpress.com, look for older post coz alreadyin discussion few weeks back, i think.


Added on December 22, 2011, 4:32 amn if i not mistaken, according to 30++ page explanation on vt1f, on the blog only a simple one, i have a complete one, if in L mode already reached it peak, it will enter the overdrive mode automatically(so, u still can gain same top speed in D mode).

There are many things in zf@punch based cvt that are really interesting to know such it only operate in full cvt mode if throttle input not more than 85%, if more, it will turn to slow sat mode, meaning that, if u pedal to metal, it is not in full cvt mode anymore,it is called slow sat mode.


Added on December 22, 2011, 4:37 amah, forget to mention, lancer only has L@S.
City cvt, not really interest me to read bout it cause they actually already discard it in new city(not really new), even jazz in malaysia.


Added on December 22, 2011, 4:40 amialways forgot to mentioned,i already shift to L when driving exora bold cfe@ 120kmh, n already driving it from 0-160kmh in L mode, but the traffic got away n it was raining during that.


Added on December 22, 2011, 4:50 amand one more thing, in sat mode when in D, u also can select L while in sat, and its still 6 simulated gears, but each gear will be also 20% higher rev than sat in D mode.

R u confius with L in cvt with the one in AT??? coz actually, even in L mode, 100kmh is just around 2.5 -2.7k rpm only,but in D mode, it is lower than that.
*
hmm.gif intriguing. very informative.

looks like a second test drive for me this weekend.

if what you said was true (20% higher rev), this further makes the VT2 & VT3 more efficient than what it already has now.

QUOTE(kimsim @ Dec 22 2011, 07:38 AM)
Recent in FLX everyday can see the CVT problem on replacement, if warranty over.. I don't think this car can drive for longer period.

Because proton since like every year release new technology on engine & Gbox.

BTW we still dunno when the car is stable on this time.
If buy early then like customer, try and error for feelback, like a white mouse smile.gif
*
Get your facts right. If every single day there's CVT problem reported in the Saga FLX, then we should be seeing FLX breaking down in the middle of the road everyday. COSE will also be full of FLX's waiting to replace the faulty part. But thats not the case now.

Proton engineers themselves has tested 100,000km on this driveterain (Saga, Exora and also upcoming Espire) for months before releasing it to the public. And during that 100,000km run, it wasn't your average balik kampung road hogging cruising. They actually put tremendous pressure and stress on the driveterain.

If you don't have the guts to face the problem associated with owning a car with CVT, then just admit it. You can stick back to your old, boring, ancient, stoneage 4speed transmission in the Maivee or Grand Livina. rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by V12Kompressor: Dec 22 2011, 08:52 AM
V12Kompressor
post Dec 22 2011, 05:28 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Dec 22 2011, 03:55 PM)
cant wait for them to make this one

user posted image
*
awww... not this shit again.

From the Espire to this. =.=
V12Kompressor
post Dec 23 2011, 02:58 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


lol, typical lame reason for making self feeling good driving an overpriced and under spec Japanese car.

laugh.gif
V12Kompressor
post Dec 23 2011, 06:59 PM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


QUOTE(kimsim @ Dec 23 2011, 03:13 PM)
Ha ha you think the Exora is local made and support this, just go a head, even you can afford imported car,
Then your life still stuck in Malaysia.

After fews year you don't completed the Exora is still perfect to suits your style for driving in 80k?

Do you think at 80k for buying local made is izit not overprice?

If less than 60k for mpv local made that's everyone still affordable.

If you think the Kia Rando is the best just go and buy.


Added on December 23, 2011, 3:19 pmI'll only said if proton nobody to gave comments and won't improved as much.

Maybe you miss understanding smile.gif
*
lol



5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0390sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 06:04 PM