Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
22 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V7

views
     
atreyuangel
post Dec 18 2011, 09:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Dec 18 2011, 08:44 PM)
What was the package that comes with the Rafale?
*
The rafale it self are much more superior than typhoon in may ways
package?

hehe kenot tell u! tongue.gif

QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 18 2011, 08:48 PM)
lolz Libya combat is like latest weapon fight against cold war weapons.

macam m1 vs t72 kat iraq.
*
but Rafale go beyond where no plane ever go,
such deep into the country disabling sam radar and battery!
atreyuangel
post Dec 19 2011, 11:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



so they typhoon is now grounded!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-20...s-fix-them.html
atreyuangel
post Dec 27 2011, 11:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



this picture taken during eks rhino, the police itself escorted the tank division.

maybe they have a funny idea! laugh.gif
atreyuangel
post Dec 27 2011, 10:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



Pak Fa is not yet on the market, and if it is true then India will be the first!
even The Russian are procuring SU-35 to its fleet and not Pak Fa


atreyuangel
post Dec 28 2011, 01:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(ET-Force @ Dec 28 2011, 12:47 AM)
guys, i need info about which models of aircraft have the ability of thrust vectoring.

as I aware, F-35 and SU-37 only. Maybe SU-35 got it.(please note that this is only that i know).

how about F-22, i heard that this jet's thrust vectoring is fail.
*
SU-35BM do have it.
MIG-35
our Su-30MKM and India SU-30MKI

yes Raptor do have TV!

other then that will be experimental or research plane

QUOTE(WanMB @ Dec 28 2011, 12:56 AM)
How about South Korea? I heard Sukhoi offered them for their next generation fighter.
*
Don't think so, like I said India will be the first as they do have certain amount of investment IINM
South Korea? IMHO they are more to the US block that Ruskies!

This post has been edited by atreyuangel: Dec 28 2011, 01:20 AM
atreyuangel
post Dec 28 2011, 04:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



I've always said it to my friends that always admire stealth technology!

"detection is always one radar away" laugh.gif
atreyuangel
post Dec 28 2011, 07:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



Even passive radar can read the presence of stealth, I'm thinking in 10 years or so!
atreyuangel
post Dec 30 2011, 01:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(yinchet @ Dec 29 2011, 03:30 PM)
Passive of'coz can detect the stealth but stealth futures dat apply on the aircraft reduce the range of detection of the radar.

stealth technology always being misunderstood. like stealth mean cannot detect. in realities it only evade radar frequency aje
let say:
A radar with a range of 200km effective range for normal fighter.
however his effective range reduce to 50km for detecting a stealth bomber or stealth fighter.
The whole things become even more complex when differ radar bands reacts differently on the stealth method use on stealth fighter. "I'm not quite sure about the technical parts"
yup, but still not sure how effective were it against the next generation stealth fighter like the PAKFA, F-35, B-2 and china stealth fighter.
however 1 things for sure its will be quite effective against the F-15 silent eagle which optimize for xband radar.
confirm..
*
hehe I read somewhere that the raptor radar signature is just as small as bee!

so to radar guy, if you see a bee that moving in the speed of 1 mach and more be alert tongue.gif
atreyuangel
post Dec 30 2011, 05:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



it is a joke bro
kekekeke
atreyuangel
post Dec 31 2011, 08:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



wow? another class of submarine for Singapore!
atreyuangel
post Dec 31 2011, 09:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



my bad!
OZ Navy have to buy a new submarine, their Collins class are disaster
inb4 Scorpene way more disastrous
atreyuangel
post Jan 2 2012, 01:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



MIG-29 is nearing it shelf life.
The cost of operation is no more economic with what they can get as before.
and of course falling behind in term of technology

so in long term is better to replace then upgrade because upgrading will be cost more.

and of course when buying we would have a better deal and AEW is vital, and buying with MMRCA will make the cost much more cheaper.

to have at least 2 option is better, in case one of the jets is grounded there is another jet available for mission and patrol.
atreyuangel
post Jan 4 2012, 09:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(kimyee73 @ Jan 4 2012, 05:53 PM)
What I try to imply is other poor regional country are trying to modernise their AF on the cheap due to tight budget allocation. They trying to purchase second hand weapons, get the quantity vs quality as you always mentioned. We on the other hand like to buy weapons with special customized configuration and also want build locally with ToT. That inflated their price by a large margin and limit the quantity we can purchase. Examples are PT-91M, NGPV, EC725, AV8, LCS etc. We know our defence budget is small and our weapon systems are old and need replacement in a hurry and yet we are wasting time and resources in paying high price for the development of the most customize weaponry and local defence industry infrastructures with only ATM as customer. It does not make sense at all.
*
We are using quality then quantity, you can see for the example why Irkut was chosen to built rather then Knaapo like the Vietnam, China and Indonesia.

If you care to check history, our govt has gone through that phase of trying to modernise our AF using second hand aircraft. lets just say the result is none too effective
Chat conversation end

the govt, follow the adage, "quality over quantity... hence we build small force will excellent capabilities.
we also are trying cultivate our own self sufficiency in defense by jump starting our own defence industries.
hence the need to include a tot for local defence industries

tots doesn't come cheap, much like your univ education which you're still paying your loans.
why parents toiled day and night to find the money to give their children education?
can the children guarantee that they will repay them in similar manner when they are old?
its the same thing with the govt pouring money trying to build local defence industries.

a case study. indon procuring 24 F-16 C/Ds. what they didn't tell you is how old and what kind of limitation of the airframe. how long would it lasts? plus the F-16s are acquired without any missiles. and like any other weapon acquired from uncle sam, it comes with a plethora of limitations and its usages are tightly controlled by uncle sam. even if they wanted to change the engines of the aircraft, they have to ask permission from uncle sam. it kind of reminds you when you're trying to drive your dad's car to the shop 4 the first time, does it
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 10:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(kimyee73 @ Jan 5 2012, 10:05 AM)
Being tight on budget we need to acquire value for money weaponry. All the 3 branches of our ATM have immediate need to develop new capabilities and replace EOL equipments, and they need them now and not 20-30 years later.

Case study - our tank program. The army has requested tank for more than like 20 years? Due to limited budget the army has to make do with an up-gun Scorpion recon vehicles. Only recently we manage to acquire a limited quantity of MBT. We spent quite a sum to develop custom PT-91M, an old design chassis with modern electronic systems. The cost inclusive of integration development could almost allow us to purchase Abram M-1 for same qty. It make sense to pay for the development cost if we're to purchase hundreds of PT-91M but true to the tradition of Mindef, there has been talk (i'm not sure if it has been already a decision) to stop at 48 tanks and we will choose another model for future requirement. WTF! Why we spent so much to get the most sophisticated electronic into the old design chassis and stop at 48. We could have purchased hundreds of off-the-shelf tanks for the same sum. We see the same trend in the Navy as well. In response, SAF purchased secondhand Leopard tank at value for money and the TNI did tried do the same but unsuccesful due to objection from producer country. Looks like our Armored Brigade will take a couple more RMK to finally come to full strength, hopefully not after the navy got their LCS by year 2020.

I can go on ranting about the same thing hitting our Navy but let me stop here for now.
*
why not, this is an open discussion right?

Not until the early 90s Malaysia war doctrine is COIN, only after that ATM can afford do be done a new generation transformation.
on MBT, yes twardly has raise some eyebrows when they win the contract, but do give more credit to the chasis of the PT-91 as they are far better then the Iraqi Tanks.
and with 370m I doubt we can have the same quantity of tank if we purchase M1 + during the recent Eks Rhino the Pendekar has perform better than expected.

with all the maneuver done at the estate there is no doubt a heavier tank would have a problem navigating the soil.

btw I also heard about the proposed 2nd type of tanks!
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 12:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(kimyee73 @ Jan 5 2012, 11:05 AM)
I'm not questioning the capability of Pendekar but the MA/Mindef in spending the extra money to develop a sophisticated equipment but purchase a limited qty. If the performance is so good, we should buy more and not thinking about buying another model that would repeat the same process again. We should expect lower unit price from repeat order but not after a laps of 10 years or more.
*
there is a talk of Batch 2 of Pendekar for at least 80 unit but along the line I never heard of a new model a considered for batch 2. Sure the Korean K1 come into the picture more than once but if there is not LOA might as well see what other company want to offer!
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 03:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(yinchet @ Jan 5 2012, 12:57 PM)
I thought they wanted to have at least 200 units.
*
IINM 80 for 2nd batch!
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 03:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



That's right!
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 03:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



Seeing the pattern from the last 2,3 year each branch got RM10 Billion to be spend
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 04:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



quite fair!
atreyuangel
post Jan 5 2012, 04:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



sorry correction another 40+ for second batch!

22 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0348sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 01:31 AM