QUOTE(elynny @ Mar 30 2012, 04:02 PM)
At least you can ask for copies of correspondence to see if they got follow up. Lawyer's Corner v2, One-stop centre for any legal queries
Lawyer's Corner v2, One-stop centre for any legal queries
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 01:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#341
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#342
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(william1112 @ Mar 30 2012, 04:57 PM) Hi Dariofoo, Depends on the bank. Some banks require it while some you can ask for waiver. If the lawyer indeed did it then ask for filing receipts as evidence. I'm refinancing my property. My loan lawyer had actually charged me entry & withdrawal of private caveat. Which i clarified later on, it was requested by the bank. My property is condo & strata title was issued out. Is it a standard pratice for banker to lodge private caveat? Pls advise. Thanks |
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#343
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(1282009 @ Mar 31 2012, 01:12 PM) In another note, I've called up my condo management to enquire about the strata title. According to them, developer has submitted the request since year 2009 but still pending at land office. Is that really take so long to get the title and is there anything the owners can do to speed thing up? Anyone can submit an application but was there a proper follow up and were all the requirements by the land office met by the developer? Any correspondence between the owners and developer ought to be done by the JMB. So, ask your JMB to write in. There is nothing in the law as it stands which requires the developer to apply for strata title within xxxx time after VP has been handed to the owners. |
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 01:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#344
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(zoesk.sk @ Mar 31 2012, 04:48 PM) Is the writ of possession only being carry out in High court not magistrate court or civil court ? Sorry but I don't follow you.If under Order 54 of Subordinate Court Rules, 1980, Defendan must be filed in 14 days ( but not serve to plaintiff within 14 days)after the service of claim, is time an issue? if only serve to the other party in 32 days after summon being serve, or 21 after 1 st hearing, 7 days after 2nd hearing, can plaintiff request for default of judgment (amount & course of action)? is it justify? what is the form no and how's the procedure? Order 54, Sub Court Rules talk about small claims, not writ of possession. What is your question and background of case, actually? Can you be more specific please? Cheers. |
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#345
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(BTG1982 @ Mar 31 2012, 11:02 PM) Hi All, 1) Yes.I bought a house with my gf 2 years ago. Now we would like to transfer house ownership to my gf's mother. Bank advise us to do new S&P and new loan agreement (Our current loan still within lock in period and will be fined). My queries as following: 1.) Could we only do the MOT (treated as love and affection transaction) instead of new S&P? 2.) If new S&P is a must, could we have 50% discount on stamp duty because of transfers of immovable property between speficied family members? Appreciate if you all can advise. Thanks. 2) From parent to child, there is a 50% rebate. From child to parent, I'm not sure. Can't remember, to be exact. |
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#346
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(101011001 @ Apr 1 2012, 01:19 AM) I have a question about MOT. Is it common for vendor to bear the MOT if strata title issued before completion date? If the developer refuses to do a direct transfer to the purchaser, then yes, the vendor has to pay for MOT upon strata title.Thank you. But normally what happens is that parties proceed based on master title and let the purchaser deal with it later with his bank. To pull the plug on documents prepared by the purchaser's financier's solicitors and start again would take time. So would the process of back-to-back transfers. So it depends on the flexibility of the parties involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2012, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#347
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(boldsouljah @ Apr 2 2012, 01:29 PM) Hi would like to ask, if its possible for me to get a lawyer to process my house purchase, S&P stamp duty, fees and so on which will be around 5k and to pay them only after ive withdrawn my EPF money? There is no fixed rule or guideline on this.Planning to buy a house, paying 3% deposit cash to book the unit, then getting a loan, and will get the letter from bank to go and withdraw $ from my account 2 to pay the remaining of the deposit. can i only pay the lawyer once ive withdrawn my EPF money? It is up to the lawyer whether to accept such arrangements. Normally fees are collected upfront. Or at least half paid upfront. So, do discuss with the lawyer first about this arrangement before any work is started. |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 10:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#348
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(mcwong @ Apr 3 2012, 10:19 AM) hi dariofoo, What is stated in the SPA? It all boils down to that. If you had agreed to execute a PA, then you can't now ask if it's "necessary". If you don't understand the law jargon in their contract, why not appoint your own lawyer to assist you from the get go? I've a property still under transfer to new ownership period. The purchaser lawyer require me to sign a power of attorney for purchaser to sign on behalf to transfer the strata title to their name.For now, we still pending for purchaser bank to release first disbursement to my bank loan. As i hardly understand the law jargon in their contract, is this procedure legal necessary? i don't want to end up in trouble. |
|
|
Apr 4 2012, 10:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#349
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(mcwong @ Apr 3 2012, 11:26 AM) thanks dariofoo, As the seller, you have the right to dictate terms as you want. It is the purchaser who has to agree to your terms, and you have the option to accept or reject his terms. That is common practice. Of course, the terms requested for must be reasonable.My own lawyer says this PA contract is to allows them to transfer the strata title of this property without hassle to get my signature after property transferred. This is special request by purchaser. They will not advice bank to release 1st disbursement until i sign this document. That is why i feel unsecured of this procedure. PAs are normally when one party would be overseas during the transaction period. Even so, that party appoints his own proxy to hold the PA, not the purchaser. However, if it is already in the SPA, there is nothing you can do. It would be a condition precedent to the SPA. That could be the reason why the bank is still holding the redemption sum until the condition is complied with by you. If it is in the SPA you have to comply with it. There's no other way around it. This issue ought to have been tackled during the drafting of the SPA itself. Your lawyer did not forward the draft to you for your approval? |
|
|
Apr 4 2012, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#350
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(sil3ntlif3 @ Apr 3 2012, 05:13 PM) Hi sirs, 1) Sorry mate am not sure about the type of insurance. But there is no such thing as a claim for compensation for "vibration/sound/lack of sleep killed some patient or old people". For a claim for damages for negligence there must be causation between the act and the result. If the beam fell directly upon the building then of course there is negligence. But for loss suffered merely due to noise emanating from piling works is not claimable. I doubt if there is insurance coverage for such matters too.I've got some question regarding insurance in Architecute/ constructing biggrin.gif please do help me out here. 1) If there is a construction building starting on the pilling, the company will surely buy insurance against adjoining property right? biggrin.gif so damage done against that building during construction or pilling will surely be insured. But if the adjoining property or neighbour property is a hospital and there are like old people inside or sick patient. What will happen if during piling the vibration/sound/lack of sleep killed some patient or old people? What insurance should be bought? What steps should be taken? 2) Let's say there is a building and there's like 10 floor in the building. Each floor is owned by different company such as ; 10th floor=OCBC; 9th floor=Alliance Bank ; 8th floor=Maybank ; 7th floor=great eastern ; 6th floor=great western ; 5th floor and onwards. Each of them bought insurance against Fire. Erm... Fire Safety Insurance. Alright? Now all of them bought the same type of insurance that is against fire but all from different insurance company. So there is 10 company/bank bought Fire insurance from 10 different insurance company. What would happen when the building burn down? What would the insurance company do? Would each of them be given new building? How is the compensation givin out? 2) If I'm not mistaken for fire insurance for such buildings, it would be purchased by the JMB/MC for the whole building and payment would be pro-rated according to the units owned and collected by each owner. I'm not 100% sure on this though. |
|
|
Apr 4 2012, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#351
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2012, 10:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#352
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(zoesk.sk @ Apr 3 2012, 06:32 PM) Hi dariofoo, I don't understand your post. It's all jumbled up and there's part from the other question by the other forummer. read ahya2009 case, i would like to confirm writ of possession must being carry out in High court or magistrate court or civil court ? can it be small court ? The tenant breach the contract but the term of contract only coming to end half year more. The landlord file in small court Under Order 54 of Subordinate Court Rules, 1980, is time an issue defendan must be filed in 14 days only or must filled in and serve the plaintiff within 14 days? if plantiff serve summon to pay and vacant the possession, the court postpone. 2nd hearing defendan file in F165 but refuse to serve plaintiff. 1)Defendan only serve AR to plaintiff but without F165 inside envelop after 30 days after summon being served to him, or 18 after 1 st hearing, 4 days after 2nd hearing (sorry not 32, 18, 4 as the notice card stated later date) what can plaintiff do? plaintiff want to buy. the clerk say not available. 2)Defendan only serve AR to plaintiff but without F165 inside envelop but cheque inside after 30 days after summon being served to him, or 18 after 1 st hearing, 4 days after 2nd hearing (sorry not 32, 18, 4 as the notice card stated later date). is that mean that defendan alreay restore the breach and plaintiff have no say and the contract keep on what can plaintiff do? can plaintiff request for judgment in default of serving (amount- rental & course of action- vacant possession{can small court do that}) base on timing ? is time justify to which is defendan only serve plaintiff 30 days after summon or 18 days after 1st hearing? The defendanis a very problematic person, haunted plaintiff day and night. what is the form no of judgment in default? and how's the procedure? Is very subjective right up to Courts. What is the best solution? to withdraw the case from small court and asked for lawyer to handle? Can you please explain your facts of the case properly and in the end, list down the questions with proper numbering so to make it easier to answer? Thanks. |
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#353
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(cheekily @ Apr 4 2012, 10:49 AM) Hi dariofoo, No, CKHT is only for subsale. It has to be registration fees for the MOT. Ask for receipt if you have any doubt as to the amount. I paid RM800 for disbursement fees to the developer's lawyer. RM400 covers miscellaneous, which include Land Search, Transportation, Document Fees, and Other Miscellaneous. The remaining RM400 is for Registration for Transfer (the lawyer mentioned that it's for registration of document of transfer at Land Office from developer to my name - Individual Title). Is this referring to the CKHT form? Is the amount for disbursement fees reasonable? Please advice...thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 01:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#354
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#355
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(BTG1982 @ Apr 4 2012, 08:56 PM) Hi, Bro, I've already answered this same question posed by you earlier.I bought a house with my gf 2 years ago. Now we would like to transfer house ownership to my gf's mother. Bank advise us to do new S&P and new loan agreement (Our current loan still within lock in period and will be fined). My queries as following: 1.) If I do the MOT (love and affection transaction) instead of S&P, shall I still need to pay the stamp duty fee as below rate: First RM 100,000.00 = 1% Next RM 100,000.01 - RM 500,000.00 = 2% Next RM 500,000.01 - RM 2,0100,000.00 = 3% Thank you! Here's my answer: "From parent to child, there is a 50% rebate. From child to parent, I'm not sure. Can't remember, to be exact. Perhaps you can call LHDN hotline just to confirm. If so, then your gf's half share to her mother would be entitled to 50% rebate." |
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#356
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(sil3ntlif3 @ Apr 4 2012, 09:22 PM) Thanks for reply 1) Don't guess. Call up an insurance company, make an appointment and get the right answers. If you're serious about this and if you think it's a big issue then do it that way. There's no other way but to seek professional advice from an insurance consultant/agent. That's the best advice I can give. Your questions now are not really legal but more towards policy of the insurance companies themselves. So, they are the best persons to advice you further on this matter. 1) Well, i guess as much that there won't be such insurance. But there is insurance for "damage against adjoining property" but that is only property. This is only an if there's a construction nearby a hospital. What could the construction company do to protect themselves? If it's not claimable what can they do? 2) JMB/MC? What do you mean pro-rated according to units owned? 2) Joint Management Body [JMB] or Management Corporation[MC]. They are in charge of the maintenance/upkeeping of the building. They act on behalf of all the owners. For fire insurance, if I'm not mistaken, the JMB/MC will get a quotation from the insurance company for the whole building. Let's say that the premium is RM100,000.00 a year. If there are 100 units, it will be pro-rated according to each unit - so RM100,000.00 divided by 100 = RM1,000.00 per unit. If one company owns 10 units in a floor, then they would have to pay RM10,000.00 (1,000 X 10). That was what I meant by pro-rated. |
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#357
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(tobetest @ Apr 5 2012, 07:30 PM) Hi dariofoo Check what is stated in the Geran/Title, boss. I’m doing a clean transfer with "love and affection from husband to wife" as consideration via a memorandum of transfer (MOT). The lawyer says I need to do consent because the state authority request it when do name transfer, may I know is this true? |
|
|
Apr 6 2012, 04:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#358
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
|
|
|
Apr 10 2012, 10:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#359
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(k3v1n @ Apr 7 2012, 09:10 AM) Dario, how are you? Original documents would refer to the original SPA between vendor and developer (or previous owner), original loan agreement, original deed of assignment (and all previous ones, if any), original power of attorney, original title and charge (if there's individual title).For my case, my bank has released the first payment to the vendor, now I'm waiting for the second release. There's been over one month ++ since the first release, I call the lawyer she said they are waiting for original document, I ask her what is this she didnt explain to me clearly. I wanna ask you Dario, what is original document actually? I can't wait for doing renovation of my apartment, can I request keys from her to do my renovation instead of waiting the second release? Hope you can give me some advice! Thanks! Whether you can request for keys is up to the vendor, or depending on what is stated in your SPA. |
|
|
Apr 10 2012, 10:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#360
|
|
Elite
2,795 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: District 9 |
QUOTE(Arndt @ Apr 8 2012, 09:05 PM) Hello, I've heard of this rule by some banks but at the end of the day, how are they going to enforce it against you? Furthermore, if they issue it but you did not accept it, how are they going to establish a binding contract against you? At the end of the day, it is just a letter of offer. An offer from the bank to you. You have every right to reject it. Why ought they make you pay for rejecting their offer?I tried the search function but couldnt find a post related to this matter. I am a first time house buyer. I went to 4 banks to apply for home loan. Only now that I realised that one of the bank, in the disclosure sheet, it says that if I rejected the loan once offer letter is issued, I had to pay 1% of the total loan (yuran pembatalan). Is this true? Does it apply to all of the banks? None of the bankers did mention to me about this! FYI, I went to RHB, HSBC, Al Rajhi and also Maybank. Thanks for any answer. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0419sec
1.01
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:26 PM |