QUOTE(ahnaz @ Jan 11 2012, 09:59 PM)
hi dario..need your advice here..
I am now in the middle of buying a condo from an agent. This is a subsale property.
The owner has appointed him to sell the condo. I have paid the 3% booking to the agent and signed an agreement in front of the agent's lawyer. The agreement stating that the owner has agreed to sell the property at $310k etc etc.
The agent also stated that his lawyer will settle all S&P agreement matters. He also said it is his lawyer's duty also to ensure that the S&P shall be impartial (not favoring the owner or me).
My question would be:
1) do i need to appoint a lawyer on my behalf? what are the pros and cons if do appoint one and what if i dont?
2) in this case, who would pay the legal fees for this lawyer? owner or me or share?
3) is this lawyer acting for more than 1 party? this is illegal right?
4) for loan agreement, there will be another lawyer appointed by the bank right? who will pay for their legal fee?
Help me...this legal things are very confusinggg

1) Purchaser always appoint a lawyer to act on his behalf. No two ways about it. There's no such thing as "agent's lawyer" in SPA transactions. It's either vendor's lawyer or purchaser's lawyer. There's also no lawyer who sits in the middle and "ensures that the SPA shall be impartial". That is all hogwash. Ultimately, the SPA will have terms which side one party, whether a bit or a lot. It depends on how it is drafted and how it is ultimately approved and finalised.I am now in the middle of buying a condo from an agent. This is a subsale property.
The owner has appointed him to sell the condo. I have paid the 3% booking to the agent and signed an agreement in front of the agent's lawyer. The agreement stating that the owner has agreed to sell the property at $310k etc etc.
The agent also stated that his lawyer will settle all S&P agreement matters. He also said it is his lawyer's duty also to ensure that the S&P shall be impartial (not favoring the owner or me).
My question would be:
1) do i need to appoint a lawyer on my behalf? what are the pros and cons if do appoint one and what if i dont?
2) in this case, who would pay the legal fees for this lawyer? owner or me or share?
3) is this lawyer acting for more than 1 party? this is illegal right?
4) for loan agreement, there will be another lawyer appointed by the bank right? who will pay for their legal fee?
Help me...this legal things are very confusinggg
2) Am sure that at the end of the day, you would be paying full fees for this lawyer. Vendor would not need to pay full fees and he needs to pay minimal fees only as the lawyer is supposed to be acting for you [read: protect your best interests]. So if the agent pushes this lawyer to you and at the same time says that the lawyer will prepare an impartial SPA, then it's time to get an independent lawyer of your own choice - ask friends and family for recommendations.
3) Yes it is a conflict of interest for a lawyer to purportedly act for two parties in the SPA. He can't act for both parties. He can act for purchaser and be authorised by the vendor to attend to the discharge of charge/deed of RnR and filing of CKHT forms [or to apply for consent, if applicable]. That's all. At the end of the day, your lawyer whom you are paying full scaled fees has to act for you.
4) If your SPA lawyer is on the bank's panel, you can insist that he does the loan as well, in order to save time and costs (disbursements can be reduced). Who pays the fees? Here's the reality in M'sia - the lawyer acts on behalf of the bank, but you pay the fees.
To calculate legal fees - use the calculator in the first page. Fees are based on the purchase price or loan sum (when it comes to your loan documentation)
Jan 11 2012, 11:07 PM
Quote
0.0428sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled