Anyone can confirm the location of the telecom tower? Is it nearer to Block A or Block D?
Investment DAMANSARA FORESTA, A new development near Desa ParkCity
Investment DAMANSARA FORESTA, A new development near Desa ParkCity
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
Anyone can confirm the location of the telecom tower? Is it nearer to Block A or Block D?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2012, 10:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
For those who cancel their unit, how long did it take for LNG to refund the RM9,400? Do you need to call them many times?
|
|
|
Apr 12 2012, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(cheahcw2003 @ Jan 8 2012, 09:30 PM) i asked the same question to the sales ppl there abt the 21 acres greens maintainance, he told me will be included in DMC, means residence joinly own the 21 acres Greens. But the actual black and whites will only comes in when we see the draft copy of DMC, do residence really owns the 21 acres greens. But the bottom line is LnG will maintain the 21 acres Greens at least until 1 year after all 4 phases are fully developed. Anyone who has sign the DMC can share on the legal status of the 21 acres green?LnG mainataince is RM0.25psf, including the clubhse facilities. If they able to maintain the 21 acres, and execute well i think it will attract more purchasers. Ph 1- Ph 4 developments will need at least 8-10 years to complete, according to their recent KLSE financial reports. |
|
|
Apr 12 2012, 06:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(cheahcw2003 @ Apr 12 2012, 06:02 PM) Does this then mean that the 21 acres greens is classified as common area under the HDA Act? Prior to handover to DBKL, will LNG be fully responsible for maintaining this common area without taxing on the residents' maintenance fee contribution? After the handover, will any portion of the RM0.25 maintenance fee and sinking fund be allocated for the maintenance of the common area? Just wondering how this work bcoz even for Phase 1 with 928 units say averaging 1,400 sq ft, we are talking about RM3,897,600 of maintenance fee collection a year, not small sum at all! |
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
Wondering how is the sales of Block D and when will Block C be launched?
How come the public launch is so long? The DF website is still a simplified version...with limited information |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(frankor @ Apr 13 2012, 09:56 AM) The Damansara Foresta is a private land including 21 acres green but Bukit Kiara TTDI is not a private land therefore the maintainance of Bukit Kiara TTDI is undertaken by DBKL. Damansara Foresta is under the jurisdiction of MBPJ therefore any concnerned party may direct the query to MBPJ if MBPJ will maintain the little forest in a private land after vacant possession. I don't think the Developer will maintain the 21 acres green and if the Developer did then the money should come from the maintainance charges collected from the owners of Damansara Foresta. The most important thing that we need to be informed is whether the 21 acres greens are acessible to the public at large or limited only to the resident of Damansara Foresta. Your drawing of the distinction between the ownership of the land for DF vs Bukit Kiara TTDI make sense to me. So will the 21 acres be common property for DF or will be under the jurisdiction of MBPJ after the handover? If the land is surrendered to MBPJ then the JMB will have no say on how MBPJ will manage the land, right? I am just wondering with total of 2,800 units and if averaging 1,400 sf per unit at RM0.25 psf and assuming 80% collection, there will be RM9.4 million per year to manage the whole 42 acres area. Anyone with experience can comment whether will the JMB be running at a surplus/deficit? The thing is we were informed by developer that the 21 acres green will be accessible to public. |
|
|
Apr 18 2012, 03:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
Current unsold units at Block C still about 30%. Wondering when will they launch Block C. LNG mentioned in their annual report that they will launch DF in Apr which is the first month of their new financial year. Looks like the too agrressive pricing set for Block D could have disrupted the plan...what say u?
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(cheahcw2003 @ Apr 19 2012, 02:49 PM) DPC's West side 2 is selling from RM550psf, and TA Damansara Avenue is giving fat discount for the unsold units, Foresta Damansara is facing challence to sell the subsequent blocks. Was at the TA showroom last week. The small unit Azelia at 1395 sq ft, low floor was selling at about RM590 psf after 2% discount.WS 2 is going for RM550 to RM750 psf. Those before RM600 psf are west facing and poor view. Launch this Sat for registrant only Added on April 19, 2012, 2:56 pm QUOTE(1282009 @ Apr 19 2012, 11:06 AM) Thanks, typo. It's Block D. My point is the developer was too "aggresive" and went for too high a jump in price after the BBB response from Block A and B. Now stuck with Block D high floors and not in a position to launch Block C yet to complete phase 1 sale. This post has been edited by CMW123: Apr 19 2012, 02:56 PM |
|
|
Apr 20 2012, 09:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(cheahcw2003 @ Apr 19 2012, 03:10 PM) Block B was a huge increase from Block A, Block B went for balloting some more. Will our paper gain from Block B high floor vanish looking at Block D high floor current sales response? |
|
|
Apr 23 2012, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
Does anyone know at which floor will have the view overseeing the hill and into Damansara Perdana? Some say 24th floor, some say 26th floor and some say to be sure at least 28th floor will be parallel with the base of the telecom tower...or it depends on which block?
|
|
|
Apr 23 2012, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(1282009 @ Apr 23 2012, 11:49 AM) U mean those units facing pool view of block A/B/C? For me as long as I don't see the tower from my balcony view would be good. Overseeing DP and KD would be a plus. But I do notice the huge price gap between level 24th and below vs 25th and above for block A. Does it mean something? Believed that all balconies facing the pool/forest will see the tower, just looking up or looking down and from different angle only...the question is the actual location of the tower relative to DF. Some SA say to the south east of Block A...some SA say facing Block C and D...no idea who is correct? From the price gap above, does it mean that 25th floor and above will oversee DP/KD? |
|
|
Apr 25 2012, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(stevecheahsw @ Apr 25 2012, 12:32 AM) foresthill Damansara is D'sara perdana project, is a 3 storey terrace , semi - D and bungalow, pricing from 2.8 million, lease hold, entry from damansara perdana P.J trade centre, easy to link the curve and Ikea. What is their website? Cann't find anything from google... |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 26 2012, 10:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
The brochure mentioned that DF is 180 above sea level??
SA mentioned that it's very cooling up there, maybe partly to justify their rationale for not providing free air-cond... |
|
|
Apr 26 2012, 12:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(stevecheahsw @ Mar 25 2012, 03:04 AM) The lawyer said no need to worry on the DIBS issue as long as developer not turning into insolvency within this period, if developer pay late or they don't pay the interst, what action u (purchaser) can take....?! We need to understand law how can protect our benefit ..Right...?! not only protect developer! I must asking developer issue a DIBS letter for signing! Has the developer actually issued any purchaser with documentation on DIBS? |
|
|
Apr 28 2012, 04:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 09:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(1282009 @ Apr 29 2012, 12:43 PM) That would mean we have to co-relate the two - the supplementary form/paper which states the DIBS schema and with the SPA which states the 42 months construction period. However the supplementary form/paper is just an acknowledgement form signed by the purchaser and does not carry any signature of the developer? Legally binding?? |
|
|
May 1 2012, 05:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(devilx86 @ May 1 2012, 12:17 AM) I'm just worried about the Communication Tower. As someone told us, that tower located nearer to Block D instead of Block A. Please advice What are your worries? As per most websites, there is minimal health hazard from telco tower...Added on May 1, 2012, 6:03 pm QUOTE(1282009 @ May 1 2012, 03:29 PM) Just a rough/wide guesstimate, I've highlighted the possible tower location in red which is nearer to Block A but not really viewable by the units which are facing swimming pool or the future phase 2 .. Thanks for the picture, the first ever seen. So those units of Block B, C and D facing the pool/forest will have view of the tower...quite a dampener as far as view is concerned. Actually if one's unit is over the hill, there is another tower tip at the other side of the hill... I have seen someone put up a map that shows the tower falls within the area of DF. does it mean that it is within the current land title? Did Celcom lease the site from L&G? Perpetual lease or term lease? This post has been edited by CMW123: May 1 2012, 06:03 PM |
|
|
May 4 2012, 06:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
Hi, am trying to check the selling price for Block B during the preview. The picture that you have posted is not too clear even after enlarging. Would you still have the picture which can see the unit no. and price clearer and can repost. Many many thanks!
Added on May 4, 2012, 6:18 pm QUOTE(1282009 @ Jan 8 2012, 07:04 PM) The most expensive unit on Block B is 925k (before 10% discount), not 990k - see chart below. I think by now, block B is 70% sold (mostly for 8th - 22nd flr). The 2 differences I notice between block A & B is that Block B has total 36 storey vs 35 in Block A & there's another layout type for block B with 1395 sqft. This is the smallest unit on sales so far. The previous smallest unit is 1426 sqft in Block A. Apologies, this was the picture posted on Jan 8This post has been edited by CMW123: May 4 2012, 06:18 PM |
|
|
May 5 2012, 05:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(1282009 @ May 5 2012, 04:08 PM) Here u go .. Thanks a million 1282009!!!Added on May 5, 2012, 4:29 pm Just a guesstimate only. I do not think block B will see it because it will be blocked by Block A. Remember eventually any tower of Foresta will be taller than the top of the mountain. The second tower is not that bad as its shorter and further away from Foresta. Actually my guesstimate of the tower location is also based on the google map which is adjacent to the entry (bridge over NKVE) to Foresta/Rustica condo from rest of BSD. I might be wrong http://wikimapia.org/#lat=3.1784759&lon=10...92&z=17&l=0&m=b Had an interesting analysis of the pricing. Booked a Block B drop out unit. The price was 3.1% marked up higher than the preview price! The best part is the same unit same size at Block D is 11.8% higher as compared to the preview price!! Really wondering how Block C will be price at. SA saying that Block C has direct view of the forest and furtherst away from the tower and hecnce justifying the highest price of all!!! L&G said public launch will be involving Block D and C...wondering when this will happen?? From the wikimpia map, does it mean that the tower is under the title of DF since it is in the same square? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1306sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 12:29 PM |