Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Are property prices going to up further? V4, nothing's gonna stop us now

views
     
cherroy
post Jan 20 2012, 04:09 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(wwwcomment @ Jan 20 2012, 04:02 PM)
i think u dont understand what "bubble" means

maybe after 20 years US house price is higher than pre-subprime period
but it does not mean that there was no bubble during pre-subprime period.
lets say a standard double story house now is RM2 mils then suddenly collapse and drop 50%.
but after 15 years it rise up back to RM2.5 mils. That does not mean during the collapse time is not bubble.
it was still a bubble. just that it has over.
*
1997 was not about RE bubble, I suffered and came through during that time, I knew it was not RE bubble that causing the crisis.


Added on January 20, 2012, 4:25 pm1997 Asian crisis is not as same as 2008 subprime or RE bubble.


Added on January 20, 2012, 4:29 pm
QUOTE
泰國房地產泡沫破滅引發的亞洲金融危機,嚴重破壞各區域國家的經濟成長,導致各相關國家與市場出現經濟衰退。


LOL, Thailand RE bubble causing Asian financial crisis? biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by cherroy: Jan 20 2012, 04:29 PM
cherroy
post Jan 27 2012, 04:11 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(mrPOTATO @ Jan 27 2012, 03:12 PM)
2012 is not gonna b good wor ...

Facing Export Slump, Asia May Like a Fed QE3 Over QE2
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-26/q...port-slump.html
U.S. monetary stimulus, blamed in 2010 for spurring speculative capital flows to emerging markets, may find less opposition this time round in Asia as the region’s focus shifts to supporting economic growth.

World Bank boss: Emerging markets at risk
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/business...avos/index.html
World Bank President Robert Zoellick has warned that the eurozone crisis could have a dire effect on emerging markets if it continues in 2012.
*
The moment people talk about property price is going to be corrected, or go down. Here may come QE3...

If QE3 is full blown in massive, we may see another round of inflation...... mad.gif
House price crashed in inflation threat situation? Can ar?
cherroy
post Jan 29 2012, 01:33 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Chongkor @ Jan 29 2012, 01:12 AM)
I plan to buy my second house (prefer 1 year old 2-storey terrace link house at non-hot area: Kajang, Semenyih) after 5 years, currently owning a condominium. Any Sifu can give comment on the housing development trend after 5 years from now? How many % of house price increment is expected for these area?
*
You are asking for a crystal ball......

It is pointless to ask such question. smile.gif

Property price trend move depended on various condition, economy, financial situation, interest rate, property market itself etc, which is constantly evolving and changing from time to time and no one will know how it will be unfolding.
cherroy
post Feb 11 2012, 02:04 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(1282009 @ Feb 11 2012, 12:39 PM)
Will higher prop price = higher rental yield (in KV areas)?
*
Previously few years of properties surge has showed, rental rate did not catch up with the pace of higher prop price.

Somehow, higher prop price may not necessary push up rental rate much, in fact, a lot of time send the yield even lower only.

For real eg.
A properties that worth 500k 4 years ago, rental is about RM2.5k.
Now it worth roughly 850k, rental is about RM2.8~Rm3k. Rm3.5k also hard to get.
cherroy
post Feb 14 2012, 03:03 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(godutch @ Feb 14 2012, 01:23 PM)
sometimes i just wonder why some of the people just dont think slightly deeper.

say if it's 10% deduction, for someone who earns RM5000 a mth, contribution to the 1Care would be RM500 a month (burns ok), and just for your information RM500 is monthly installment for a RM100,000 mortgage loan, 4%, 30 years.

so, immediately, affordability drop by abt RM100K for someone who earns RM5K a mth.

For families who are already facing difficulty catching up with inflation, this 1Care is going to push more middle-income earners into the low-income category, widening the weath gap between the Rich and the Poor.

It would be higher for higher earners (if you earn RM10K a month, then contribution will be RM1K a month). but the impact would be greater (felt badly) if they made those who earn < RM2000 to contribute as well.  FYI, 10% of m'sian workforce is government servants and they are exempted to contribute, pensioners also are said to be exempted, so technically speaking, the govt is making private employees to fund their medical expenses as well.



Added on February 14, 2012, 1:24 pm

Just ask yourself, 1Malaysia got deduct your monthly salary directly or not? This 1Care will  mad.gif
*
If the plan is from 10% of wages, like reduction in EPF, the main group being "crushed" may come from middle to low income people only.
Wealthy one may not being affected at all.
Unless it is done through tax system, if not, wealthy one may a lot of way not to pay a single cent contribution to the 1care.
As we don't know how the plan will be carried out, so I don't want to jump into any conclusion.

But for simple illustration.

For eg. a millionaire that work as shareholder/CEO of the company, he may choose to earn RM1 from the company as annual wages.
So if 1 care is done through 10% from the wages, he just paid RM0.10 pa. sweat.gif
While company make millions of profit and company declare millions of dividend which eventually the millionaire get million income from dividend.

So if like that, the wealthy, high income earners may not affected, unless it is done through tax system.
If it is done through tax system, then it is considered another form additional tax hike already, which can kill the competitiveness of trying to encourage FDI.

Reduction from wages is a big flaw to start with.
The system should be trying to seek for the wealthy to pay more and less wealthy to pay less to have a equilibrium for social welfare.

If the middle class being crushed hard due to 10%, the likely outcome can be middle class demanded payrise from employers or being bounded by employers, by then employers being forced to raise the goods prices, eventually, inflation around.
With inflation around, properties price has even firm footing than before.



cherroy
post Feb 14 2012, 04:18 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(godutch @ Feb 14 2012, 04:13 PM)
hi, i think this is indeed a good argument, eventually it's inflation and loss of purchasing power. but i would think that increases in good prices and petrol worked more like boiling a frog with slow fire while if there's 10% deduction from the monthly salary it would be something like pouring hot water on the frog, the frog would jump  biggrin.gif
*
The "big jump" effect is more on political front instead of property purchasing power.
Wealthy/affordability people won't stop buying because middle class people being crushed 10% or less income or goods price increase make them less affordable.
Inflation actually, make the property cheaper and more affordable if the property price doesn't rise.

cherroy
post Feb 25 2012, 02:13 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(AVFAN @ Feb 23 2012, 10:28 AM)
local prop prices may not crash, but won't go up for some time.

unless one thinks prop prices are totally detached from the overall local economy.

auto sector sales down 25%
manufact investment down 26%
prop prices still up-up-up? with gomen sitting on their butts politicking everyday of the year, year after year, dishing out angpows whenever they like, how strong is the economy?
*
Go down or not, I don't know.

But inflation pressure is everywhere.

Oil price now near USD110.
Civil servant may get payrise which can be range from RM700 to Rm2500 payrise.
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v6/newsgeneral.php?id=647367
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=...2199&sec=nation
QUOTE
Among the proposed recommendations was a review of the salary review of those in Grade 54 and below, a salary increment mechanism for those who have reached their maximum pay under their grade, maintaining of seniority within the ranks, a general review of the grade structures and salary increase of between 7% and 13%.


Cheap interest rate around the globe, even locally, the OPR at 3% seems peak, and many predict BNM may cut rate in the near future.
China start to relax the SRR.

All are favourable to inflation.
I don't see how an inflation threat environment can prompt a property market crash, or severe price down.
cherroy
post Feb 26 2012, 01:42 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Feb 25 2012, 10:23 PM)
It is happening now, property prices went up more than 100% in the last 3-4 years. Did average employee or business get 100% income growth in the last few years?

*
Company profit generally rise in tandem with inflation.

Last time, company make hundred million is considered huge, now we are talking with billions.
When company profit grow, so does employee wages (yes I know it is not proportional, but it did grow).
We see payrise in most company annually mostly.

Some company and business did have 50-100% grow in profit level, if compared to 5-6 years ago, particularly banking, commodities related.
One can ask how much banking industry is giving out bonus this year.

Last time, people earn 2k is considered very good, now we are talking about people work in MNC that earns 5k, 8k, 10k or even more.
Even civil servant now pay is way better off than 20 years ago. Civil servant wages level even surpass private sector now.

Inflation threat means drive people with money to go for hard asset to protect the wealth, so it provide certain support to the property price.
After all, with inflation across goods and materials, developers cannot build too cheap house or build a house at a loss, eventually no new supply at certain price figure.
No new supply means a supporting factor for property already.
Yes, high end one may be a different ball game, but we see some floor being put in in low to mid cost property with inflation on goods and materials, or even wages.


cherroy
post Mar 2 2012, 10:04 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Mar 2 2012, 05:45 PM)
http://biz.sinchew-i.com/node/57597

庭貸款申請挫20.6,貸款批准跌高達27.7%

汽車與住宅產業貸款批准雙雙暴跌近21%

信用卡與個人貸款批准,各按年大跌約50與30%

消費者貸款萎縮高達16.4%,汽車與產業首當其衝,各挫15.5與6.3%
If this trend continues, where do you get the money supply to keep bidding up the property prices?

So what do you mean "when the loan is tighten, it will help to prevent bubble from bursting, but not leading bubble to burst"?

When households are burdened with huge debt load, even banks are willing to lend, but the households simply cannot take on more debt without income growth. This will be causing the credit bubble to burst.

*
This is about new loan approval rate, the loan still growing, household debt show no sign of dropping even with lower new loan coming out. (This do worry a bit that's why BNM starting to imposing more strictly loan requirement).
Lower approved new loan just means new loan is less than before, there are still new loan made. Money supply still growing.
Look at banks financial report, most banks reported new loan growth about 8-12%.

If household is burden with huge debt, and even bank want to lend, but cannot qualify, it doesn't means credit bubble will burst.
In fact, it is a good thing the household cannot get a new loan.
The result, the household need to tighten the belt, and pay hard for the loan repayment. In this way, it will deflate the bubble, not bursting the bubble.
The bubble bursting can occur when household debt even at 70-80%, continue can get easy loan, and way beyond the income ability, then for sure, this will lead to the path of bubble bursting, just like subprime mess.

cherroy
post Mar 3 2012, 10:18 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Mar 3 2012, 10:03 AM)
I said we might go back to a gold standard monetary system, not using gold coins to replace paper notes to buy stuff.

Ever wonder why do Chinese use these words 金融 & 银行.

Historically, fiat paper currency could only survive average 47 years. This fiat paper system has been around for about 42 years, this time will be different?

British built they empire with gold backed British pound and conquered the world for 200 years.

The US started they empire with gold standard US dollar and dominates the world for over 100 years. Ever wonder why do we call US dollar 美金? and now the US has debt to GDP over 100%, and USD can still be the world reserve currency for global trading?

China and Japan signed a largest trade agreement in history early this year, they will be using their own yen and yuan for trading instead of USD.

Iran recently announced is accepting gold for exchanging their crude oil, this is the beginning of the death of the petrodollar.
If you can see the writing on the wall, you may want to load up as much physical gold as possible while you still can.
500 - 600k for a 20x70? look at the new launch price, touching 1 mil for a terrace in areas 30km from the city, 500-600psf for a condo in areas far from the city?

*
Gold is never or can replace current modern world finance market, and the world has not enough gold to be used upon, banking system cannot co-exist with gold as medium, world trade cannot function properly with gold as medium.

Fiat currency exist way beyond 42 years. Only USD was gold backed once in a period of time, none of other currency being gold backed since their existence. So fiat currency survived for 42 years is a false statement to start with.
RM or many many more currency (in fact across) is not gold backed either and even RM has short period of existence, it has exist for more than 50 years. Where is the claim of fiat currency exist only 42 years? It is fiat across.
Last time world economy is small and most countries in the world is under-devloped and availability of gold is abundant as compared to circulating currency, now not the same situation.
Gold backed is not viable option, be it quantity wise or co-exist with modern financial market functioning method.

Imagine go to bank, ask for home loan to buy a house, bank said to you, not enough gold to lend you, need to dig out more gold first, before they can lend you.
or
Cannot give you FD interest, need to wait the gold to dig out first. laugh.gif

Loading of physical as much as one could? Great.
The major risk - theft and rob. Once happened, all finished. laugh.gif
cherroy
post Mar 3 2012, 11:16 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Mar 3 2012, 10:52 AM)
Under the current US dollar system, USD used to backed by gold, and other countries use USD to back their own currencies. That's why central banks in the world hold US treasury bonds as reserve, they used to own gold as reserve.

The US severed the gold standard in 1971, therefore the whole world is running a fiat paper system first time in human history. 2012-1971 is less than 41 years, 42 years is a false statement I have to admit.

It's not about we do not have enough gold for global trading, it's about the gold price. You can print 10 trillion paper notes and back by 10 tons of gold, or print 10 million and back by 10 tons of gold.

We do not have to have inflation, ever wonder why a house cost 10k in 1971 and is worth 800k now?

We had 0% inflation from late 19 century to early 20 century, because there was a gold standard.

The thing is the current system is hitting the wall, we will have a new world monetary to replace the current petrodollar standard. It's very likely to tie back to gold, it is the only way to to gain public confidence.

Ever wonder why the US keep invading middle east and wanting to control the world oil supply? The US dollar is backed by petroleum, they force the world to buy oil in USD therefore there is always a demand for US dollar.

Ever wonder why Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi got killed? They wanted to trade oil in other currency rather than USD.
Well, I do not want to talk about gold in this thread anymore, it's not relevant. Stop digging out gold topic Mr. Kidmad please.
*
Central bank hold US treasuries as reserves because you trade with US, and get USD, in return, the USD has nowhere to store, better buy treasuries that can at least yield you some money.

Any currency is not backed by USD, this is false statement as well.
We have been using Fiat money even longer period of time.
Fiat currency is backed by confidence of public.

Money is just a tool of medium of exchange, so does gold. It doesn't have a value. Money or gold just a medium everyone agree as exchange of goods medium.
The modern world system is not hitting the wall, 2008 crisis has been the history.

Stop spreading false statement around that USD is backed by petroleum as well. If one said USD is backed by it is the largest of world economy, and superpower nation be it in term of financial, economy or military, then at least sound a bit logic.

Remember the banking story I posted, banks cannot co-exist with gold standard. Banks need to close shop, nobody can get a loan, developers cannot build more house, resulted, no job, no inflation. Ya, good. You may be too young to know, that prior before 70-80's before Malaysia economy booming time, you need to beg employers to have a job, many people jobless, those having a job seem a luxury and fortunate already.
No inflation come at a cost, also in this period of time, we had 2 WWI and WWII, that population died, economy being damaged due to war etc.
From 1900-1970, and 1970-2012, the change of world economy, tech, society, welfare is so enormous in the last 40 years compared to previous period. In fact, the last 40 years change has way more significant than 400 or 1000 years in human kind history.

Gold standard, yes can be adopted but may come at a price of deflation, jobless (banks and developers, car manufacturers are first few gone, then domino effect come afterwards).


Added on March 3, 2012, 11:20 amI think someone bought too much gold already, wish gold being used to back the currency, so that gold price can shoot to USD10,000 per ounce. tongue.gif laugh.gif

ok, stop on those non-related to property.


This post has been edited by cherroy: Mar 3 2012, 11:39 AM
cherroy
post Mar 10 2012, 01:25 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Mar 9 2012, 06:24 PM)
I love to read these stuff, it's very entertaining indeed!
*
So,
while one read those "entertaining" petrol dollar article, economy collapse, property sector is heading to crash articles etc,
in reality properties price continue to climb, or stubbornly high, stock market continue to surge, people are enjoying profit from properties and stock market, while one only feel syiok reading those article, think economy is collapsing without any single penny being made, while other are busy reaping profit, counting money.

No offence.

With civil servant payrise, and potential min wages adopted, GST, 1care which had not yet implemented, everything is pointing to inflation threat.
Whether current property is in the bubble or not, I don't know, but I know inflation can deflate the bubble naturally, without causing big crash in property.
When inflation hit, everyone want to hold on their hard asset.
When inflation hit, previous 800k house seems a bubble, inflation can make it become reasonable (as inflation means everything rise from goods to wages across).

I would worry more about inflation, instead of property market crash.

cherroy
post Mar 16 2012, 10:03 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(zuiko407 @ Mar 16 2012, 09:49 PM)
100%. hope for bubble burst and grab one for own stay
*
Own stay doesn't need to wait for crash one, anytime is a good time as long as one loves to have the property and afford to have.
Afford to have, like it, buy.


cherroy
post Mar 19 2012, 09:24 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(ayha2009 @ Mar 18 2012, 10:35 PM)
http://nanyang.com/node/430132?tid=643

The god has return... "feng sui lun lau giin"

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-ne...ight-month.html

I believe the property shunami will come to malaysia in the next 6 moons.. ") rclxms.gif  thumbup.gif
*
We have another fortune teller here. rclxms.gif
Property Tsunami in the next 6 month? I heard this 2009, 2010, 2011, now 2012. Get bored already.

Even one get it correct one day (for sure, one day somebody will hit it) when property price drop time, so?.
Can a prime location property that 5 years ago that was 500k and now 850K, drop back to 500k?
cherroy
post Mar 21 2012, 10:42 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Iceman74 @ Mar 21 2012, 10:15 AM)
with the increase, do you think ppls in general will think about buying properties whistling.gif
makan also tak cukup ler doh.gif
*
With inflation, the wealthy one may eager for hard asset to invest to protect against inflation, property is one of hard asset.

Yes, transaction may be quiet down, but it doesn't mean price will plunge significantly.
It may due to fire-sale in initial stage especially those speculators and high leverage one, but with inflation factor, there is a limit how far a property price can plunge especially for prime location.
You will see "nobody want property" instead of price plunge too far in this kind of scenario.

Only poor one, makan also tak cukup suffer, but when makan tak cukup, there is pressure for wages increment across, so inflation factor coming in again.
Unless the consequence is recession happening, but if recession happening, inflation will be tamed down by recession factor.
So there are 2 opposite force acting one another.
cherroy
post Mar 21 2012, 11:13 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Iceman74 @ Mar 21 2012, 10:53 AM)
I do agree with some of your theory.
But do bare in mind, b4 all these properties investment all hype up
for example...during old times, out of 100 transactions maybe got 5% got problem & need fire-sales
but with current situations
transaction increase 1000 & value increase as well, so if 5% turn sour, that is alot compare with old time

beside those old days, there are alot cash rich ppl & those really wanted a home

now, tell me how many are there now that are cash rich & really needed a home.
those wanted, already have.
those dun have & can't afford, sad to said, will remain un-attainable
*
Money will become more, not less if one understands how financial market work or economy works.
That's why rich become richer.

There are many cash rich people around as well as cash rich company.
Those rich bought those property are not for home, but as investment or park their excess money instead put cash in banks which earn zero interest (most countries ).

Yes I do agree, oversupply condition can occur, which could lead to price stalling or falling afterwards due to fire-sale, but properties nowadays, no longer bought as home already, but as investment.
As long as there are money that willing to invest in property, after sometimes properties situation become normal back after correction.
cherroy
post Mar 21 2012, 11:46 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Iceman74 @ Mar 21 2012, 11:30 AM)
sorry i don't know how exactly economy works but i do know market run emotions & those who can change the world emotion -> rules the world.

maybe what you see is worldwide company & big listed companies. I more exposed to more SME & SMI companies & I can tell you, most of them are not rosy this year compare with few previous years back although some are cash rich. Mostly I spoken to are preparing for cashflow problem or backup(if need to expand), properties investment are their last priority. They only buy cos they will use/need it.

Where else, for the rich & famous, properties are for plaything jer. they do care about ROI. They like, they buy. 

If Malaysia are so rosy, EPF no need to go UK to buy properties whistling.gif


Added on March 21, 2012, 11:32 am
if you read more about biz journal...there are few big mining corporations are selling their operation
*
I know SME/SMI are facing difficult challenge ahead, but undeniable, many SMI/SME are more well prepared in their balance sheet in current situation.
Situation out there are not rosy, many run well below capacity across.
I never said situation is rosy, I just pointed out, situation is not as bad that property must crash across.

As you mentioned, many are preparing for cashflow problem, means that many company are well prepared.
Market crash generally occur when people are complacency and not well prepare for difficult time, classic eg. prior 2008 global crisis, prior 1997 crisis, many company hit hard due to debt cannot be refinanced, and run into trouble of cashflow.

For rich, properties not only for playing or for ROI, they do treat it as "another money parking option"
cherroy
post Mar 21 2012, 04:46 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Iceman74 @ Mar 21 2012, 12:09 PM)
Cherroy,

look like we agree on this.

There is a question I like to listen your opinion. As you know, Malaysia stand out among SEA all these years because bless with stable economy & political situation. Currently Indonesia/Vietnam are consider stable to invest with cheaper in everythings compare to Malaysia. No need to compare Singapore as they are the best example for Malaysia to follow but our gov half heart to follow them. Will it affect our properties investment in long terms? We are neither here, no there.
*
You already answered your own, in the middle biggrin.gif

Properties price can be largely due to per capital income level as well.
The higher, the potential the property price can go.


cherroy
post Mar 21 2012, 09:26 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Mar 21 2012, 05:10 PM)
The thing is how much inflation we got in the past few years? Everyone knows government cooked the book and reported 2% or so inflation, in reality inflation could be about 5%.

But how much home prices had gone up in the past few years? 100%-200%?

No matter what asset class, this kind of price movement is simply not sustainable. This is just another tulip mania.
*
Oil price did surge 100%, from USD40~50 during 2008, to now USD100. tongue.gif

By definition, gold also a tulip mania? laugh.gif

How much inflation for the last few year? 5% as mentioned.
Gold surged for more than 100% between 2008 to 2012.
No matter what asset class, this price move is not sustainable, just another tulip mania. laugh.gif

cherroy
post Mar 22 2012, 11:45 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sampool @ Mar 22 2012, 10:59 AM)
our oil last few yrs jump to RM2.7/litre... ppl cannot accept and fall back to RM1.8/litre... u still remember arr..
*
Now the Real price in the market is RM2.70.
Those cannot enjoy subsidy industries out there one are paying RM2.70 for industrial diesel.

Just because you/we are not paying (or yet) Rm2.70, don't take for granted the price is RM1.90 now. smile.gif




This post has been edited by cherroy: Mar 22 2012, 11:48 AM

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0658sec    0.72    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 05:28 PM