QUOTE(Kagaya @ Nov 7 2005, 07:43 AM)
I've seen Corsair's released a PDF file on how much performance gain in gaming and normal use between 1GB of ram vs. 2GB, turns out that the price didn't justified the performance gain at all, so marginal that the fps is not noticeable, say, from 125 to 129?
But then, when it comes to mem hungry apps, it did helps, a lot...
Still, 2GB is more likely for Pro, 1 GB for enthusiast, back to back, gaming is still GPU and GDDR dependent... instead of stocking in on more RAM, best still get a better GPU, or GPUS...
By the right, something like a noisy RAPTOR really makes loading apps fast but if anyone got hold of the GIGABYTE whatever-you-may-call-it i-RAM or something like it, it uses RAM as HDD space and the loading times is 5x to 6x higher than Raptor, but needed a rechargeable cell to keep the RAM running...
But then the future should be solid state NAND-Flash or XOR-Flash in high density, small footprint... so our harddisk will be like 2.5", but no more platter and pickup, just solid state Flash ram in USB Drive, furthermore there are already initiatives by CPU maker to actually etched Flash RAM inside the CPU as cache so that loading up is faster without the need of reload all the recent instruction...
Hybrid HDD would be the transition from Platter-Pickup to Pure Flash (Solid-State) Storage in the near future, like the Samsung Hybrid with 16MB of Flash RAM buffer... At the moment, those solid state storage is strictly for industrial use and too expensive to figure out...
But i believe with the introduction of Physics engine software like Havok and hardware like ASUS Ageia, then perhaps there's more to future gaming than just the mere RAM...
Perhaps if RAMBUS hit it at the right note, their much touted XDR would be kicking DDR3 and DDR4 ass, hope the JEDEC fella won't fail them once more... or they don't make it too expensive...
No, flash memory will not be used in the CPU anytime soon because it's way too slow. It will be on the mainboards. And adding engines will make the game even bigger and more resource hungry which will usually mean more RAM on top of other things.
QUOTE(Hornet @ Nov 7 2005, 08:01 AM)
Wow, RAMBUS is still around eh...
Hmm....i somehow hope that RAM woundn't branch out into 2 camps, DDR and XDR...we've already had enough options to figure out.
And i hope to see Ageia would be brought into gaming soon once Vista is release. (i'm not to keen with havoc idea trying to use GPU cycle to simulate physics.)
No, XDR will be relegated to specialty devices like the PS3. Most manufacturers are not too keen to pay RAMBUS royalty. And besides, the future will see abstraction of memory types by way of FB-DIMMs, so whatever memory type used will have lesser impact on compatibility.
Microsoft is developing their own brand of DirectPhysics, probably will be released with Vista. And would you really rather pay USD200-300 for another card that will do nothing but physics than getting say another gfx card or a better one?