It is up to the owner to put the price tag, not necessary follow the so called market rate. Unless u r scared of can't letting go your unit

They have a Facebook group... do join if you are a owner. Plenty of discussion and updates there.

http://on.fb.me/leyuan

Btw, anyone that felt that the carpark facade is way different from the original illustration?

Yes, i notice it too. it is also different from the scale model too. I'm afraid if the developer also change some other things to this project where we can't easily notice them…...

Looks real good.
Although it is true UOA resi designs all look almost the same (refer to UOA Bangsar South, Setapak Green), but their clean and crisp workmanship really seem to top other resi products at the similar price range.

Even if the design is conventional or so-called boring by many, I personally think LeYuan looks great, in an elegant manner!! Congrats to all lucky owners

This post has been edited by chongstk: Jul 26 2014, 02:46 AM

The images shown in brochure are merely Artist Impressions prepared by the architect during Concept Design stage, or early Schematic design stage. The only thing confirmed upon sale launching is apartment unit layouts.

After that the building design will go thru tender and design development process whereby most facade specifications can change somewhat from initial artist impressions, due to factors such as constructability, costs, authority codes & regulations etc.

This post has been edited by chongstk: Jul 26 2014, 02:45 AM

Ooh.... Ini macam la.....

malaysia way of doings things, apa machiem pun boleh
nothing is specified. if overseas, they will even tell you the thickness of the wall. over here....nothing. no info. and they seem to be able to change anything that they want. if every time say "artist impression only" then developers can draw all nice nice then later claime "artist impression only" then how?

can sue? yes you can and it has been done successfully before. see how far you want to go only

agreed~!

Wah RU tok macam developer staff or agent. Sibeh expensive but look macam piece of sh*t u also OK. Downgrade here there also sibeh no problem. Cut cost here there also boh problem. Simply cannot do due to sohem reason also tak mind . Sibeh jialat Kau kau lik.

This post has been edited by HELLO HELLO: Jul 26 2014, 03:05 PM

+10 Yeah. Should shoot them Kau Kau lik. Macam cincai finish the outlook. Never put effort n never try to achieve at least 80% look macam the artist impression work.

If cannot do. Don't ask artist draw until sibeh canggih n luxury. This uoa macam sibeh cheating pipu.

This post has been edited by HELLO HELLO: Jul 26 2014, 03:07 PM

Ya, I retook at the brochure, n found out the roof top should have a nice shade n no penthouse. Did the developer sell the penthouse during launching??

And if u look carefully at the side of the building, the developer put on grey painting in between the window. It looks like stains, unjoined painting.... Unfinished work....

haha..u also notice ler....sure he or she got duit kopi from developer...we also can get easy money from developer...apa macam? can blow water until sky for development like ulu yam, rawang, broga..etc...

Agreed..the design look cheap and like piece of sh*t. Only one guy here still compliment.

i too hope i really got a handsome duit kopi from UOA lor...such easy money to make
Anyway I honestly do not think the end product looks bad, at least in that photo. You owners are angry over the colour of painting looking different from the perspective image?

Just have to remind yourselves do NOT believe completely in artist impressions.

Typical example... Usually perspective artists would tend to show lush greenery surroundings, but maybe in fact there are cemetery, rubbish dump etc. So just make sure you research the surroundings thoroughly and double check with sales person.

And for building design, I feel that YTL is one of the very few developers that deliver almost exactly as the sale images.

SP Setia too!

Nothing to complain about uoa. It looks great.

U all should look at 288 just across the street. Orange was not in the brochure. It is totally different from sales picture. If it is nice, ok to be different. But.. Akisama.. I am speechless

akisama is different class cannot compare. 1 class lower. price also cheaper. u pay peanut u get the monkey.

but for uoa... you don't get what you pay for. paid sibeh expensive you stil get piece of crap.

This post has been edited by HELLO HELLO: Jul 28 2014, 12:01 AM

UOA design really crappy. No matter how much you pay, the same design mould will be reused. Check the design for this Le Yuan, Bangsar South View, Old Klang Road Southbank and Setapk Green. All having the same building design but at higher and higher pricing each later launching without any design enhancement. Due to location, some premium for better location is acceptable. Otherwise & overall, buyers are paying peanut for a monkey.

Maybe Le Yuan owners can try petition to ask for facade improvements.
I googled Le Yuan sale perspective images, actually the Car Park podium looks different only right? For the apartment towers no significant differences. But as I said, I do agree with you that UOA has been duplicating same facade treatment and colour scheme across a number of recent projects.

Although above mentioned condos got the similar design by uoa but I think it looks great! I have checked out the happy garden condos last week.. Le yuan still look the best! Seringin for me is overrated.