Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 2 2011, 12:39 PM
|
|
Guys I need you all help here! If you think my photo deserves a like in " Malaysia is My Home" photography competition please help me like the photo. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=282198728461306Your "Like" is much more appreciated. Here is the direct quick preview of my photo (Unknown) Malaysia Airlines by YongJK, on Flickr Sorry mod if you find this very annoying. Please delete this if this post is inappropriate
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 9 2011, 08:40 AM
|
|
Canon got one ultimate all rounder lens -> 28-300L
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 9 2011, 09:33 AM
|
|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Sep 9 2011, 08:50 AM) nikon also got 28-300 maa you mean this ? Never try, but should not be that bad Nikon 28-300mm VR
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 9 2011, 09:36 AM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 9 2011, 09:34 AM) Its just the 18-200 FX version, no big deal. Don't expect great optics out of it as an all rounder. very sharp already http://www.kenrockwell.com/trips/2010-10-04-395/
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 9 2011, 10:19 PM
|
|
No worries, leica lens does not have weather seal after dipped with water still can shoot like a boss
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 10 2011, 06:46 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Calvin Pixels @ Sep 9 2011, 10:28 PM) Does VR work in video recording? or it reduce the vibration a little? generally yes. at least for canon lah haha just switch the off and on button when recording , for telephoto the result is much significant QUOTE(iloveOov @ Sep 9 2011, 11:12 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « pic spam... love the 35mm 1.4G...the colour so beatiful...love it  Added on September 9, 2011, 11:17 pmRM4600 free 1 cheap Japan UV filter xD if you didnt mention what lens u used, i also dono what lens is it
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 12 2011, 04:19 PM
|
|
I can directly tell its fx camera used in the first place for iloveoov photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 12 2011, 04:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 12 2011, 04:23 PM) ya D700 user, check from flickr...oh wait...you sold your D700 to him one ? XD normal guess only XD take back my word XD I deal by sms bro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 12 2011, 05:51 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 12 2011, 04:32 PM) Really? How do you see? o_O teh bokeh from the edge
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 13 2011, 01:11 PM
|
|
Tats why u need wandeeassmakthree 19cross af all over screen. Or wandeemakfor 39
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 13 2011, 02:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 13 2011, 01:21 PM) okay, boss how about when you put your DSLR on floor? low until cant lying on floor that one.... XD then had to rely on Live view right? or when not enough tall, you had to rely on Live view also right? that's why i ask that XDDD OT: what the heck with the nymph, i wan azunyan.  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I got one azunyan 1/7 figure pending... not yet release meanwhile i still play nymph first » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « DSC03880 by YongJK, on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 13 2011, 09:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 13 2011, 09:01 PM) Focusing is horrible on that body unfortunately, which is why the D3 triumph over it with the stellar AF performance under low light for sports.[  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I will just set to area mode AF, and then grab a few shots without looking at the viewfinder. I wanted to explain this earlier but too busy with work. Well, would say most consumers don't go in detail. Good example is the A77's 24MP 12fps  , when one goes into the details... it isn't as impressive. If your budget is sufficient for a 85mm f/1.4, that is definitely better than the 50mm f/1.4 ;-). Better in all aspects, except the pricing? But you do need to know your style, 50mm or 85mm? For me I like 85mm on FF, but 85mm is a little too tele for me on DX.  how come in so many intl sports even still so many canon wan ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 14 2011, 10:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Sep 14 2011, 03:09 AM) If buy the D700 now, is it good enough for another 2 years? Used the D90 for a year, I feel like I need an upgrade already  People can use 1dmark two for few years,more than d700 until now. Yet they still shoot good picture
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 09:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Sep 16 2011, 08:48 AM) Dont think this lens is for insect. Its more appropriate for stuff in a control environment. First thing come to my mind: Nenedoroid. Hahahha Good for you then.  I got 35mm f/2 AF which has pretty impressive MFD with 0.25m only ! paired up with my +4 close up filter is quite nice to take nendoroid photo DSC04241 by YongJK, on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 10:01 AM
|
|
Haha of course la, mainly use the macro lens for flowers , insects,
macro lens focus throw is too long thus focus very slow.
but then since we can use close up fitler to close up, macro lens isn't necessary for casual close up shooter IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 10:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 16 2011, 10:05 AM) Err, even when shooting at 1:1, you still need close up filter or extension tube for smaller objects. that is why canon MP-E65mm 1-5x super macro lens comes in handy Not only it produce 1:1 but up to 5:1 But then, those are for extremist, I doubt most of the normal people do used up until 1:1 all the time
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 04:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(BenSow @ Sep 16 2011, 01:32 PM) Nikon 70-300mm VR. opinions? Save a bit money and get the tamron sp af vc usd version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 07:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sOuLx @ Sep 16 2011, 06:59 PM) i'm confuse to buy which lens for travelling. right now i'm using 50f1.8D because its small and light. but i dont fancy this lense because its hard for me to shoot for landscape photo. what's in my mind right now is nikkor AF-S 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR or the AF- S 18-200 VR .which one is better? i read some reviews, but still couldnt decide. or is there any good 3rd party lenses? will get the 16-85 anytime. 18-200 IQ isnt as great as the 16-85 anyway. but I will think twice again and get 17-50 f/2.8 Tamron
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 16 2011, 09:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sOuLx @ Sep 16 2011, 09:34 PM) because i'm just a casual hobbyist, i wouldn't want to spend too much in lens for now. also i'm eyeing a another lens and some accessories. i'll start slowly. maybe after this i go and buy 16-35 f4.  aiyah... just buy what u can afford bro. with 17-55mm u will never complaint anything. VR ? even 24-70 also dont have VR
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS0168257061
|
Sep 17 2011, 08:46 AM
|
|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Sep 16 2011, 10:24 PM) after owning 17-55mm, the only thing u can complaint, is urself(bad photog)  yeah, just like back then owning a 17-55 but taking crappy pic
|
|
|
|
|