use hwmonitor to confirm? coretemp is showing 47C
AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V25, 990FX, Bulldozer!
AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V25, 990FX, Bulldozer!
|
|
Sep 27 2011, 11:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
use hwmonitor to confirm? coretemp is showing 47C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 09:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(shinjite @ Oct 13 2011, 09:22 AM) I suggest skip the current BD and wait for Enhanced BD in 2012 or next gen BD, as Ivy Bridge coming soon by Intel Most important thing is they should fix their power consumption at OC levels, it is too high....thanks to its 2 Billion transistors QUOTE(cloudwan @ Oct 13 2011, 09:44 AM) Agree with you, to say its a total failure isn't really correct, coz from most of the benchmark it seems when mostly heavily threaded it does excels almost on par with 2600k but alas its single threaded & IPC is the biggest weakness.. demmm.. IMO this is due to the fact they they want to constraint themselves to the same socket, Piledriver rumoured to be 10-15% better..add that to current conditions, still behind. Imagine when IvyBridge comes, Intel will be even further ahead.Hmmm figuring maybe skipping this generation of BD, maybe wait for piledriver later on.. still if hands too itchy maybe wanna test ther FX4xxx, bwahahahaha Just love their ram bandwidth & ram oc, dual channel 1600mhz already on par with tri-channel 1066mhz.. |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(Babysnatcher @ Oct 13 2011, 09:40 PM) What is the best AMD AM3 processor to upgrade to with good overclocking capability? to go for an AM3/3+ processor, you will need a mobo that supports it though...Currently using AMD 4200+ from my old desktop overclocked it by 200 mhz only. thanks depends on how much you want to OC it...the newly release batch of processors (AMD FX) can definitely OC..but performance is er..... Older Black Edition (BE) processors (ie. PhenomII) are also quite OC-able |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 11:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(ericsim @ Oct 13 2011, 10:55 PM) thanks for your reply bro bios should be from mobo sensors unless it is individual cores then it is directly from the sensors in the chiphwmonitor <55C should be ok |
|
|
Oct 14 2011, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
can post screenshot?..normally for thuban should have temps shown...try using the tmpin
|
|
|
Oct 14 2011, 09:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 14 2011, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
temps look fine to me, it is < 50C lol
|
|
|
Oct 15 2011, 12:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2011, 11:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
keep it below 60C, i think @ 3.6ghz will hit >60C already
|
|
|
Nov 18 2011, 09:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(zuiichi @ Nov 17 2011, 06:07 PM) hurm, i retry again this morning, following this guide how come 3 cpu-z showing same tab? it says to overclock Ram, followed by CPUNB, later on CPU. i just finish prime95 for sharp 3 hour. any other setting i change from this, will give me crash reboot, or core 3 n 4 worker stopped in prime95. this is my current settings: ![]() if i try again, by overclocking cpu first and lowered the ram freq, will i gain more clock for cpu n CPUNB? thanks for ur reply. p/s:now my; vcore = 1.39v, vcpunb = 1.28v, Vdram = 1.66v i have tried CPUNB 2360mhz, vcpunb till 1.5v, still crashreboot. (sometimes when enter windoes, it reboot, soemtimes crash till blendtest with prime95). also tried CPU 3332mhz, vcore till 1.43v, same result as above. cpu-nb can just increase the multi, no need to touch HTT (FSB = intel term) lower ram so that you it doesnt interfere in finding the limit QUOTE(chaics85 @ Nov 18 2011, 09:29 AM) guys.. i unlock and OC my proc. phenom II 555 to B55 @ 3.8ghz at 1.37v. kinda hard to actually hit 4ghz stable, you can try 1.45vi only up my multiplier to x19 and bus speed at 200mhz. i stress it with OCCT for 10min. and its stable and gaming it for few hours also no crash at all. Is there a need for me to stress it again for 1-8 hours to test its stability?? 1st time OC here.. kinda noob.. i tried OC to 4.0ghz at 1.40v, it boots to windows without problem. but crash after few minutes of OCCT test. whats missing here? why cant i stable at 4.0ghz.. will post some screeny when i get back home. spec: Phenom II 555- now B55 3.8ghz 2 x 2gb team elite ram MSI 990fxa-gd65 640gb hdd gigabyte 6850 OC edition |
|
|
Nov 18 2011, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2011, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
I think most of the heat is coming from the pwm
I suggest you put a fan a the pwm heatsink and see This post has been edited by dafreak: Dec 2 2011, 09:58 AM |
|
|
Dec 28 2011, 02:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
chip and software need patching....if PD not gooding then I guess AMD is doomed in procs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
try pressing ctrl+f1 in the main bios menu, should reveal some hidden things
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(howszat @ Jan 1 2012, 10:22 PM) woohooo! Now I get a few more options... normal for giga boards to "hide" some options Let me have a look first - what am I looking at? Added on January 1, 2012, 10:30 pmK8<->SB HT Speed 5x no need to touch K8<->MCP HT Width v16 ^16 no need to touch also DRAM Configuration => Set Memory Clock => Auto/Manual set to manual, should give more ram options and a few others... Added on January 1, 2012, 10:38 pm QUOTE(howszat @ Jan 1 2012, 10:22 PM) Added on January 1, 2012, 10:36 pmCKE Power Down Mode - Disable/Enable overheat protection if not mistaken, disable if you want but be careful with temps DDRII Timing Item - Auto/Manual self explanatory |
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(howszat @ Jan 1 2012, 10:40 PM) Set Memory Clock - Manual no, change the memory clock should have options like 667, 400 etcMemory Clock - DDR 667 CKE Power Down Mode - Disable DDRII Timing Items - Auto/Manual Added on January 1, 2012, 10:44 pmK8<->SB HT Speed 5x --> This 5x is not the multipler I need to decrease? Shows 1x 2x 3x 4x 5x |
|
|
Feb 18 2012, 07:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(xNinGx @ Feb 18 2012, 05:43 PM) Sifu-sifu... I got a question here... OCing my 1100T with 880G chipset not a big matter right? why i just increase my multiplier x4 then my clock speed up 800mhz more, then when i play game it will lag than b4 oc? LOL, where u hear this kind of thing from? & i heard someone said that amd oc is just for benchmarking... in real performance, after oc it will be lagger than non-oc... == help.... u sure u "increased" the multi or not? or u just set it at x4? |
|
|
Feb 19 2012, 01:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2012, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
QUOTE(xNinGx @ Feb 19 2012, 09:01 PM) ![]() based on this pic, u should be able to see lor.. in bios should look different be is the same thing... Your proc Bus speed or HTT: base (not OCed) is 200mhz Multiplier or CPU Multi: x16.5 Core speed: HTT x Multi = 200 x 16.5 = 3300 MHz if you set your CPU multi to x4 then become 800 MHz = slower/didnt OC... This post has been edited by dafreak: Feb 19 2012, 09:15 PM |
|
|
Feb 21 2012, 10:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,064 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Star Stuff |
|
| Change to: | 0.0365sec
0.56
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:08 AM |