Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 New Toyota Camry 2012, is Really coming now!

views
     
zweimmk
post Jul 24 2012, 07:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(michspc @ Jul 24 2012, 06:32 PM)
First, it is a 1 yr 9 months sx model forte

81.8k - 6.38k = 18k/1.75 so it is RM10,285 or average 12.5 % per year 
so why it is not like what i said depeciate more than 10% per year????
I really value ur 'calculation' but obviously it was very wrong , and u try to be smart enough u just make  foolish of yourself, i  burst into laughter and my jaw literally fell lol
*
I don't think the numbers are that bad to be honest.

My car sold for 81k (2008 Corolla Altis) and that's coz I got a very high trade in value from Volkswagen. I checked with some 2nd hand dealers and the range was between 76k to 78k. If I had gone on Mudah, I could possibly sell it at a high of 83k. I bought my car at 117k after all the discounts and stuff.

So I lost about RM36,000 in the span of 4 years which is about 9k per year.
If I had gone outside of VW, I would have lost about RM39,000 and that's RM9750 in depreciation.
Alternatively, if I decide to sell the car direct, my depreciation would be lower but it's a matter of how long before the right buyer comes along.

Nothing beats personal real life 1st hand experience and honestly for the Forte, I would say it's still fairly decent. I say the resale value difference will range between a low of 8% to a high of 15% less than a Japanese make. All things considered, you won't be bleeding and begging the 2nd hand dealerships to take your car when it's time to let it go.
zweimmk
post Jul 24 2012, 08:08 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(michspc @ Jul 24 2012, 07:47 PM)
even if count as 2 years for 1 yr 9 months old car...  the depreciation  is like 9k per year  so it still more than 10% ...
*
Still not an unreasonable figure what. That's about what I lose per year in a span of 4 years for my altis. The difference isn't too bad la come on
zweimmk
post Jul 26 2012, 08:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 26 2012, 08:21 AM)
The other issue would be the pricing. Imagine how much Toyota will jack up the price if it were to include VSC and other luxury specs.
*
It's really UMW in regards to pricing as I believe they dictate how much the car is sold for. They can price it however they like, it doesn't necessarily mean people will buy it
zweimmk
post Jul 27 2012, 02:14 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vey99 @ Jul 27 2012, 12:39 PM)
bermaz knows the 6 wont appeal to the masses. so its going to target those with taste for the design. and squeeze the ringgits out of these ppl. its not hard to be more attractive than camry on paper, so features will be there to entice u, and so its perfectly logical to price it above the camry, and earn more. even that hanokuku dude said he wont mind pay 180+K for the 6.
*
Hmmm, I dunno. It would be foolish to go after a niche market for them.

From a personal point of view, I would not pay an amount that is higher than their continental competitors - it's just like I would not pay 180k for the Camry because the brand and the car is not worth the asking price. So even if the M6 can throw in all the bells and whistles, I'd still find it hard to justify paying so much money.... and for a Japanese car!!!

I believe the smarter thing for them to do is throw in almost all the bells and whistles or at least have 3/4 of all the gadgets found on the K5, keep 6 airbags and price it around 160k to 165k and they've got a solid Camry killer.
zweimmk
post Jul 27 2012, 05:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vey99 @ Jul 27 2012, 04:41 PM)
fantastic car. all the review i read practically worship the car.

and its proven how great it sells by seeing how much there are on the road.
*
My friend test drove the Mondeo, and I trust his feedback. Basically the car is very solid, everything about it is good except for the not so good looking dashboard. Driving feel, NVH everything all top notch, even better than the Passat and PUG508... the problem however lies with the badge. If you put a VW badge on the Mondeo and numbers will fly, heck you stick a Hyundai or KIA badge on it also the car will easily sell as well.

If I'm not mistaken, the car was designed and tested by German engineers as well. Great car let down by the brand selling it, LOL!
zweimmk
post Jul 28 2012, 07:00 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 27 2012, 11:11 PM)
Camry 2.5 6 speed auto la.
*
Mechanically, the Camry 2.5v 6 speed is inferior compared to the Mondeo 6 speed Dual clutch transmission. The shifts are faster and more precise in a DCT gearbox and since it is also a manual transmission, it saves more fuel
zweimmk
post Jul 28 2012, 07:36 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 28 2012, 07:12 AM)
He comments on my quest that compare xv50 with a 2L car that cost more.


Added on July 28, 2012, 7:15 am

You guys said that people who bought camry have a bad mindset. 'If it's from toyota, ...'
But, what about you guys? Anything from the european is good?
*
No, reliability will always be Toyota's biggest strength, that and a really comfortable ride. Its conservative but elegant styling also appeals to the masses. If the car was priced lower than its European competitors, most of us won't be talking about it right now. It made itself a target by pricing higher than European cars and they offer more for less.

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Jul 28 2012, 07:38 AM
zweimmk
post Jul 28 2012, 09:39 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(landlily98 @ Jul 28 2012, 08:21 AM)
Bro, with regards to all the negative comments that you received, please don't feel frustrated, you had bought yourself a very good car and you should enjoy every moment you spent with her. Despite all the praises Mondeo receives, you will still see at the end of the day, only very few buyers will buy one, talking big and loud here is easy, how many actually dares to commit him/herself to buy a Mondeo? Besides, Mondeo's price is not that much higher than Camry 2.5's price, and with all the extra goodies Mondeo offer, it should attract many hardcore fans. Is this happening? I leave it to you to judge.....What you had bought gives you peace of mind, so, relax and happy motoring.
*
I think it mainly has to do with the marketing of the brand. Ford has never been very active in Malaysia, if they had been, then their cars wouldn't be perceived as a cold car brand as much. For a brand to sell well, it also has to be priced correctly and marketed aggressively. Nasim is doing a bang up job pushing Peugeot out the door, they are absolutely fuxx when it comes to customer and after sales service but otherwise, they are really aggressive in setting up 3S centers, pricing and car promotion.

Also the current Mondeo is an outgoing model to be replaced by the new Fusion. But if SDAC still does the same job it did with the current gen Mondeo, it surely will still sell poorly.

I do agree, at the end of the day, the Camry is still a good car despite its flaws but it could have been so much more.
zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 09:50 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 30 2012, 09:04 AM)
"Real world" is not just the car itself, but, (dang need to repeat again and again), also the availability of SC, cost of service, fuel consumption, NVH, RV, etc.

Actually, I like S40 more. It's within the same range of price with Camry. However, it's smaller and will probably break my pocket after I bought it.
*
I think it's a good car that meets your requirements

- SC is near your home, so convenient to get car serviced and fixed and even once warranty ends, most local mechanics have more experience with Japanese cars, and particularly since you're living outside of KL - I'd think this is even more so
- Decent fuel consumption
- NVH is one of the best in this segment of cars
- RSV is probably highest among all D-segment but this won't really matter if you intend to keep the car over 5 years or longer

The S40 is actually a cheaper car btw compared to your 180k Camry.
zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 10:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 30 2012, 09:55 AM)
Finally, someone here understand the needs for most people that live in the real world.
Yap, but, S60 is much higher than XV50.

So, I just take the median.
*
Only true enthusiast will buy a Volvo here in Malaysia. This brand here is so cold and 冷門, problems will surely arise when you sell it or when problems start to come in.
zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 12:55 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 30 2012, 12:41 PM)
Smaller in what sense? Just cuz a car is shorter doesnt mean its interior space is smaller. And the S40 is about RM5K cheaper than the Camry. Although its design is quite outdated but its dashboard layout is better than the Camry. But comparing between the S40 and the 2.5V Camry only, ill take the Camry. but i gave some serious thought to the S60 before i decided on the Optima.
*
You would for the S60? I wouldn't. It's way too outside the box. That car definitely is for the enthusiasts and for people who really love the marque.

It's a good thing I let myself stew for a few days to let the passion and enthusiastic feeling die off when I looked at the F30 3 series and A4 in more detail. I definitely would have regretted it had I took a 7 year loan on impulse just to buy one of them.
zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 01:14 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 30 2012, 01:04 PM)
Did you know that i actually spent alot of time in Kia showrooms just walking around the Optima countless number of times just to allow that initial wow factor to wear off? Like you, i didnt wanna get hooked just cuz of the looks alone. I thought i was the only one but now i know that im not alone.  rclxms.gif

But i too looked at the 3 Series and the facelifted A4 but the interior space was a real let down for both cars despite being luxury brands with all the other specs on offer.
*
I'm actually okay with the 3 series and the A4. I'm was particularly impressed with the new 3 series in terms of leg room especially since it's still a C-segment. The 320d was functional but the 328i was the car to get IMO.

Anyway, gave up on them since I can't pay either cars off in 5 years no matter how I punch the numbers and I no longer wanted to wait.

Now that I look back, should I have waited for the government to announce the changes to the NAP?


zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 02:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchong @ Jul 30 2012, 01:56 PM)
I know you have your views on paying off in 5 years and not wanting to take longer loan.

From a financial perspective, since the car loan rate is fairly low and FD rate is higher, would it not make sense to borrow longer? Then you have more time to take advantage of the difference in rates.
*
I dump most of my money into stocks, prefer to invest that way. Every month also dump some amount that way and over time it adds up.

Besides a lot of things can happen in the next 5 years, let alone 7 or 9 years. For cars, 5 years is the max I'll ever go.
Anyway, already bought and got the VW Passat so as far as car is concerned, I won't be changing cars in the next 4 years unless I strike 4D or something. LOL!


Added on July 30, 2012, 2:24 pm
QUOTE(IluvProton @ Jul 30 2012, 02:11 PM)
sad.gif

I like the F30 also but must wait another 4-5 years also
*
I won't look at the F30 already in 4 to 5 years. In 4 years time, the new W205 C class will be out to replace the current W204.

Cars will only continue to get better as time goes on, except Toyota in S.E.Asia. They're moving backwards instead of moving forwards.

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Jul 30 2012, 02:32 PM
zweimmk
post Jul 30 2012, 04:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 30 2012, 03:58 PM)
Isnt that what i said before albeit with different words?  rclxub.gif

Btw, are you sure others did as much homework as i did?  hmm.gif
*
I would also do as much research as you if I was buying a KIA/Hyundai myself. And I kind of have while shopping for our 2nd car, I like the Elantra and Forte a lot actually but wife was not comfortable going Korean so have to respect her decision.

Never test any car 9 times but definitely tested driving the Forte a total of 4 times at 4 different showrooms. Kind of pity the salesman though, push the car so hard but still can't convince my wife to buy
zweimmk
post Aug 2 2012, 08:07 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(22222222 @ Aug 2 2012, 12:20 AM)
The owner should have taken the matter to court. Most likely would have been able to force a settlement issue.

But alas, this is Malaysia, not USA. Had the same issue happened in USA, you'd surely see a class action lawsuit filed against them.
zweimmk
post Aug 2 2012, 09:51 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(22222222 @ Aug 2 2012, 09:15 AM)
Yes, i think owner will bring this to court.

But for me, bring it to court or not is small matter, the problem is for a new camry (5 mths old) when accident happen why the airbag doesn't function? Is there any calculation to said that how serious of the impact and then the airbag will come out?
*
No idea, fact is - it failed to function and the longer you wait, the worse the situation is for the owner and the advantage goes to those big corporation.

If the owner had taken legal action right from the beginning, I doubt Toyota can deny much compared to his situation now.

So the lesson of the day for everyone here -

If involved in an accident and your airbag fails to deploy. Get a lawyer and document the whole process. Don't try to pandai and do everything on your own. Best way to get a big fat settlement biggrin.gif


Added on August 2, 2012, 9:54 am
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 2 2012, 09:45 AM)
How to test that the airbag is in working condition for any car? What about other so called "safety" devices?
Most of them are controlled electronically by some sort of microchip.

Is there any possibility that those devices will fail when needed. Yes, they worked perfectly in lab or in control environment. But, will it work during the needed time.

My computer and phone also freezed. For example, my computer sometimes works perfectly when it is tested before a presentation, but, freeze during the presentation. And, work again after the presentation.

iPhone and China clone iPhone both work fine as a phone except that the later is cheaper.
Is the cloned one is reliable if the original's reliability is also cannot be fully trusted?

Any car manufacturer can fit many of the so called "safety" devices.
Will they work as intended?
Do you get high quality "safety" devices, or some China cloned one? Especially if the car's price is far cheaper from it's competitors.

We have research a lot for literature to support our "hypothesis" that these "safety" devices are good and needed.
Perhaps, now is the time to review on the contradiction.
*
Who cares, long story short. It better work when it is supposed to, that's all. Otherwise, be prepared to get sued.

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Aug 2 2012, 09:54 AM
zweimmk
post Aug 2 2012, 10:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 2 2012, 10:04 AM)
Perhaps that's why the VSC is not fitted in XV50.
In the first video, it is said that the steering wheel jammed, just like the K5 video that bumped straight to a petrol station.
*
Rubbish la. If VSC causes steering wheel jammed then its a design flaw on Toyota's part. It should never jam until you lose control of the car.

The K5 video is pretty much owner panic, car already accelerating unintentionally so he probably also dunno what to do also. Nothing to do with VSC here.

Somehow I think you don't quite understand how VSC works at all. The video posted by 22222 has nothing to do with VSC, its more with why the safety features didn't work when its supposed to.


zweimmk
post Aug 2 2012, 01:47 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
In the case of 22222's video. I honestly doubt VSC would have helped much, when you go into a 360 degree spin, that means you've already exceeded the threshold in which VSC is able to help the driver regain control of the steering wheel.

My experience with Toyota's VSC (and I know it works) is a soft beeping sound will ring out and the steering wheel will vibrate, you will still be able to steer and the brakes and power will also apply and cut to help slow the car down further.

In the video's case, VSC and EBD still would have helped the car slow down faster but as these electronic system are only in place to help the situation, the laws of physics still apply and I firmly believe when the car spins that way, no amount of safety system onboard would have changed the outcome.

So quite clearly, based on the damage we see - there's definitely something wrong with the airbag system, it should have deployed but it didn't. It could be due to the programming but whatever the case, it doesn't make me feel any better about Toyota's after watching that.
zweimmk
post Aug 3 2012, 09:47 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(IluvProton @ Aug 3 2012, 09:03 AM)
I looking forward another 5-7years later in this thread.
biggrin.gif

Then I know the result when I see who complaint 1st. Now all nonsense  about talking know well about new car.

Any new product sure got mention good and best of their product. But we only the reliability when we use it after sometimes.

Reliability - who masuk bengkel more
Safety - Ratio of accident /total local number
Resell value - after 2 years you will know how is the value.
FC - you all will know after hitting 50k km. you can lie to anyone. But sooner every forumer will mention the FC since not you only who use same type of car.
*
2 years not enough, an accurate benchmark is about 3 years minimum and 4 years to give a really good indication of how well the car will sell off.
zweimmk
post Aug 3 2012, 10:29 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(IluvProton @ Aug 3 2012, 09:53 AM)
ok, you are right. lets take 5 years shall we  brows.gif

include passat also can?
*
Probably, but 4 years down the road, I'll let the Passat go also according to my planned car usage lifespan.

When I got my Vios and Altis years ago, I sold it according to the timeline I had planned to sell the car off.

Spectra: 3/1/2 years
Vios: 3/1/2 years
Altis: Exactly 4 years
Passat: ETA 4 years, possibly 4/1/2 years



11 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0572sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 03:30 PM