Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 New Toyota Camry 2012, is Really coming now!

views
     
zweimmk
post Aug 15 2012, 04:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
It's pretty tough for me to get good FC because as I've said, I'm on city roads more often

Routes that I often use:

Tropicana Mall towards NKVE Damansara toll plaza (City)
LDP short distance turning towards NKVE Damansara toll plaza road.(mix city/highway)
Residential route towards NZX/Ara Damansara (city)
Old airport road towards Subang Jaya or towards Puchong and usually either going to Bandar Puteri or Opposite IOI mall shoplot area (mix city/highway)
Penchala Link towards Kuala Lumpur (highway)
Duke Highway towards Ampang (highway)
Highway towards midvalley from Taman Maluri (highway but forever jam one this stupid road)
Federal Highway towards KLCC (mix city/highway)
NKVE towards Bukit Raja Klang or route into Kesas Highway towards Kota Kemuning (Highway)
NPE towards Cheras (Mostly Highway)
From Lowyat to Jalan Loke Yew then into Damansara highway (mix city/highway)
Damansara Highway towards KLCC area (mix city/highway)
Penchala link towards Jalan Kuching and routing to KLCC (mix city/highway)

More often than not, stuck in traffic jam... so how to achieve good mileage like that? Can only hit 100km/hr every now and then... Grrrrr!
zweimmk
post Aug 15 2012, 06:12 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 15 2012, 06:07 PM)
Too difficult to compare FC.

I find using Instant FC to compare FC between different drivers/cars is pretty meaningless. Road condition. Even very slight elevation. Head winds.  So many thing can affect Instant FC.  Even the same driver can occasionally unconsciously have different foot pressure affect FC. Your best Instant FC can be twice as good as your Average FC.

Then for city driving. One person's city driving could mean average 2km per trip and the other person's city driving is 4km or 6 km per trip and that makes a difference also.
*
Yeah actually, it's tough due to all the conditions you've stated.

So better to just standardize

What's your instant FC reading when your gauge is 2000RPM ~ 3000RPM @ 120km/hr on a flat straight road with NO ELEVATION? That way we can limit the scope and get a fair and accurate number.
zweimmk
post Aug 16 2012, 10:05 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(sleepy @ Aug 16 2012, 09:15 AM)
Err, folks I think we're going way out of topic here with all sorts of matters unrelated to Camry being discussed here laugh.gif But I'm quite curious, is there other 2012 Camry owner here other than kepalapening?
*
Ok, back on topic.

It's tough to recommend anyone buying the new Camry based on the asking prices and the features given.

Buy it if you are after:

Better resale value
Ease of selling the car when its time is up
Good after sales service
If it's the only car brand that has a service center closest to where you are staying
Comfortable and Spacious ride

Don't buy it if you are after:

Good handling and performance
Premium Safety features
Convenience & styling features
5 year or more warranty
Value for money
Latest technological innovation in automotive engineering
zweimmk
post Aug 17 2012, 07:19 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
If fuel prices were really at market rate, how many people here you think can afford to keep their cars? If cars maintained their ridiculous prices here.

Imagine if 1L of fuel cost like RM3.30 @ Ron95?

Vios full tank = RM138.60 (42 liters)
Civic full tank = RM165.0 (50 liters)
Altis full tank = RM181.5 (55 liters)
Camry full tank = RM231 (70 liters)

That's a week worth of fuel. In one month, it's quite a significant chunk of salary there. So yeah, cars would definitely need to be bloody cheap if they want to do this.


zweimmk
post Aug 17 2012, 05:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 17 2012, 03:18 PM)
If car price were reduced, you can save say....RM25,000 on a Vios.

If fuel is at non-subsidized RM3.30, that will allow you to buy 7575 liters of expensive fuel or 90,000-km of driving. Where got problem?

Now we often see only the driver in car with no passenger. For these driver, there will be incentive for him to get a Viva instead and mean 113,000-km of driving. Less pollution also. If someone want to drive BMW 7 Series, that is his problem and his money to buy expensive fuel.

And since fuel is at global price, nobody want to smuggle out of Malaysia any more.

So I am all for cheap car and expensive petrol. That is why i say BN and PR are all stupid.
*
That's why I say it has to be cheap enough if petrol is to follow market prices, imagine if you're paying 2k for car installment and another 1k or so just for petrol, unless you're making like 9k a month, it's going to burn in a huge hole in anyone who is making anything less than 7k.

I don't see how they can remove the excise duty anytime soon, if they do it, it will have to be implemented in stages, probably over a period of 10 years to soften the impact on new car buyers. On top of that, they have to make sure public transportation is good enough to support the general population, something which the government has been dragging its feet for years.

zweimmk
post Aug 20 2012, 10:33 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(TamaUser @ Aug 20 2012, 10:14 AM)
Lexus 2012 GS250 uses 4GR-FSE which is manufactured since 2003. Problem?  brows.gif
*
No, because at that price point, you're not just paying for the engine, you're paying for the overall package and the overall package is pretty damn impressive. But this is Asia, and it's hard to overcome the mindset of paying so much money for a Japanese luxury brand over its continental rivals.
zweimmk
post Aug 20 2012, 11:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(TamaUser @ Aug 20 2012, 11:11 AM)
You probably didn't get my point.  shakehead.gif
*
Haha ok, i get it now.
zweimmk
post Aug 21 2012, 08:57 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 20 2012, 05:49 PM)
Found this (strangely in an article about the new upcoming Accord):
Just goes to show different folks have different opinions.

From: http://www.cbt.com.my/2012/08/09/tell-us-h...3-honda-accord/
*
Actually I agree with the personal view that Korean cars look a bit too extreme particularly the K5. It's kind of hard to shake off the image of a boy racer despite the car looking the most trendy and sporty of the bunch. The Sonata actually looks a lot more sedate and fluid IMO but ain't my cup of tea.

Has anyone taken a look at the new 2013 Accord? My god, what did they do to the car shakehead.gif
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 08:59 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Got a fairly good reading on FC now cruising at 90km/hr. consumption figures is about 5.3L/100km @ 2050RPM while 130km/hr figures is around 6.6L/100km @ 2300RPM. Nice empty highway along LATAR can get nice figures.
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 09:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 22 2012, 09:13 AM)
Yes that should be quite right then. But whats your RPM at 110kmph?
*
It's about 2100RPM or so. FC is quite respectable at 5.8 ~ 6.3L/100km

@ 130km/hr - it's about 2300RPM and FC is alternating around 6.6L/100km ~ 7.1L/100km.

I reckon if I engage cruise control, the FC figures should drop and hover around a lower figure.
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 10:09 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 22 2012, 07:05 AM)
Yap, the Passat with A reg number. K5 not sure.


Added on August 22, 2012, 7:11 am

Kangar-kl 6 hours non stop rm75. Last time being berhemah it's only rm60.
Kl-grik-kb 12 hours rm85.

Calc yourself for Km/L. I use ron95 rm1.9/L.
*
It's not a difficult thing to do, the next time you go to a petrol station and pump petrol. Write down the km travelled in trip A. it should be 600 or 700+ if you zero your trip meter at every fillup. Then look at your receipt and note down the gas up pumped in. You give us those figures, we can calculate how good your FC is
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 12:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 22 2012, 11:03 AM)
Am I correct in saying these are Instantaneous FC reading? If yes, then these are meaningless when translate to actual Average FC.
*
Yeah but it more or less let you know what kind of ballpark figures you can expect and estimated mileage when you drive. It's not strange to estimate roughly how much distance you can travel looking at your fuel tank and consumption info, I do that fairly often just to try to lower my FC in city driving.
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 12:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 22 2012, 12:53 PM)
In my experience, the actual Average FC could be almost double of Instant FC. So if your IFC giving you 6 liter/100km, in actual fact, you could be expecting 10 to 12 liter/100km instead. That is far off the ballpark figure.

Though I don't drive the Camry but if it can indeed give you those 10 - 12 liter figure, you should be jumping up for joy already in city. In reality, I don't think that is possible. My 2 sen.
*
Yes realistically, I think the new Camry would fall into the range of 9.xx to 11.xx for pure city driving conditions. It would probably be able to get that kind of mileage with very little effort. If there's one thing that Toyota does fairly well, it's definitely optimizing their engine for good fuel efficiency
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 01:28 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 22 2012, 01:12 PM)
Plus, to some people, city driving means average travel distance of 10km per travel. To others in small town, it could mean 2km instead with engine hardly warmed up so giving far worst FC and pretty impossible for a heavy Camry to get 12 Liter/100km
*
If anything, I expect this Camry to better the previous Camry figures by about 10 ~ 15% and also better its rivals in FC as well.

Logically:

Less safety equipment = less weight = improve FC
ACIS = improve FC
Dual VVTI = improve FC
6 Speed AT = better than 5 speed or 4 speed = improve FC
Less weight due to stronger and lighter materials used in construction = improve FC
Tinted car provided default = less power used to power A/C = improve FC
Car has parts that reduce drag by default = improve FC

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Aug 22 2012, 01:30 PM
zweimmk
post Aug 23 2012, 03:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
One of the most respected publications in US reviewed the Toyota Camry Hybrid 2012 (US) as one of the top 10 choices for consumers to buy. The Hyundai Sonata (US) also falls in the top 10 choices, underlining how far Koreans have come since their debut over 20 years ago.

Now if only they reviewed the Asian variants - I'm sure they will more than a few interesting things to say, LOL!


zweimmk
post Aug 28 2012, 12:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 28 2012, 08:46 AM)
I dont quite understand what ure trying to tell us here. Do u mean to tell us your distance to empty is 538km on a full tank?

But your RPM at 110kmph is better. Approx 1875 RPM. Mine is 2250 RPM.
*
Eh, the rev is as good as mine at that speed and mine is a 7 speed DSG gearbox. But not surprising at all, Toyota have always tuned their cars towards good fuel efficiency rather than power.
zweimmk
post Aug 28 2012, 01:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 28 2012, 01:06 PM)
Yes thats wht i think. As u said, its tuned for fuel economy which is why the Camry's power output isnt all that great especially for the older 2.0L engine. But i checked online that the overseas version 6 speed 3.5L V6 Camry's RPM at 100kmph is 1700 compared to the Sonata 2.0L 6 speed at 1900 RPM.

But im a bit surprised that Kepala Pening's 2.5L Camry is only getting 580km+ range on a full tank. Both the Camry and Optima have similar sized fuel tanks and no matter how much i rev and drive un-economically, my distance to empty has never dropped below 650km i think. Thats why i would like him to provide some actual mileage calculations.
*
That range counter is never accurate and if I'm not mistaken, the car will light up once the tank has used up about 60 to 63L of fuel, meaning, there will always be petrol in the tank unless you really drive it dry. Even my car's range counter is not accurate, always show about 700km but end up I usually have to fill up at 600km or so with only 4L of fuel left in the tank tongue.gif

I think it's just the counter programming. If you ask me, I think the range difference between our cars is at most what? 5 to 10%? That's a realistic figure if driving style and road conditions are equal.
zweimmk
post Aug 28 2012, 02:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 28 2012, 02:31 PM)
In 2.5V Camry, it will never light up, unless I choose to display it. Need to check the manual what this figure shows.
*
Never light up? You sure or not? When fuel tank nearly empty, if it don't light up then how to know if you nearing empty tank or not?
zweimmk
post Aug 28 2012, 03:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 28 2012, 03:22 PM)
So the figure shown of 9.9km/l is for 100% city driving?
*
I think safe to assume 70% highway and 30% city with that kind of mileage.
zweimmk
post Sep 3 2012, 11:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Sep 3 2012, 08:00 AM)
Eh gone quiet now?
*
It's quite hard to talk about a car that's underwhelming in many aspects.

Warranty - Not as good as their rivals
Specs - Not as good as their rivals
Safety - Not as good as their rivals

Won't comment about look or performance because these are quite subjective to different individual based on their preference. It is reliable, comfortable, very spacious and very easy to sell off though but those points aren't anything new to begin with.

Perhaps if it did come with class leading specs such as blind spot vehicle assist system or lane departure warning system or adaptive cruise control then there'll be more buzz. Otherwise, aside from FC... is there anything to discuss?

Even if you talk about aftermarket mods, what else is there to do in the 2.5V?

Soundproofing? Dynamat? 3M? Wurth?
Tinting? 3M, Vkool, Llumar, Huper Optik - choose your poison
Body kit? Dunno if there's even anything good out right now
Audio System?

ACIS system - ?
Dual VVTI engine - ?
High tensile steel GOA body construction - ?

11 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0591sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:51 AM