In fact when I visited the Sales Galery during the recent Moon Cake Festival, the SA did mention about the Shopping Mall as the USP

All Pangea (Paragon, Solstice, Eclipse) Buyers, there is a meeting tomorrow 1:30pm at Shaftsbury Square with other buyers to exchange opinions. At 3pm, there will be a meeting with the developer OSKP at the Showroom. You are encouraged to attend to raise your concerns and also get to see the preliminary design of the new master plan.

Is this true?? I buy a unit of Solstice Duplex too. I so sad to hear this. My relative in Sibu told me that they are selling  Eclipse there now .

My relative know I buy Solstice ask me if Eclipse can invest or not. Snap me a pictures, still same like last time.

So is the change confirm?

  [attachmentid=4159452]

I feel so cheated. 

I go tell my relative do not believe them, no more shopping mall.

They think go Sibu cheat people summore. F**k OSK. 

How can they do that?

phenomenal0210, it seems like you have not fully grasp the entire impact of the change. Even if osk thinks changing is for the better, going behind the buyers back to change them makes osk integrity questionable. If you recall from the session, the planning for kepler is almost complete and ready to launch. The kepler promotional banners are all over the place, before osk even seek to have a so-called dialogue with buyers. Why so late? Even this dialogue is limited to buyers who found out about the changes through the social media etc.Remember there are thousand other buyers out there who are still in the dark. If osk really cares for buyers, they should deliver what the buyers have agreed to pay their hard earned money for. If osk were to show me their latest master plan right from the start, I just wouldn't buy it. I just would NOT have bought it as it doesn't fit my purpose, simple as that. Imagine you place an order for a car with 2 airbags for front passangers as that is your basic safety requirements, and when the car is delivered, it doesn't come with airbags at all, replaced with 2 tissue box holders(kepler brand) . Useful as those tissue box holders may be, they just don't meet my basic needs for a car. How would you feel? Now what are you going to say to the car dealer in this instance? I would say, don't care how you do it, give me my 2 airbags, or give me back my $. This is only my personal opinion, as every purchasers have their own personal reasons for buying it.

Absolutely... I was taking this integrated development as reference to midvalley,  sunway pyramid even though it might not be as big but these integrated development have 4 important element which is 4-5* hotel, office suites, service residence n mega mall. This is planned in pangaea previously as well. In term of key success of integrated with these 4 key elements it start from 1. successful and attractive mall (uncertain anymore now), 2. office suite (uncertain now too), 3. hotel ( uncertain as well) and the last comes to services residence (which osk trying to add more n this is the least important of a integrated developement). The successful don't comes from your residential units instead from the mall. I don't think midvalley would success just by supply needs to their office building n residences. Therefore osk talk is plain bullshitting. Indirectly they are telling you that for midvalley to success they would need to build a town first ( add more residence). Stupid right..

May I ask why Paramount? (I bought from them earlier)

Can someone please correct me if I'm wrong. At the time of Solstice launching surrounding condo residential projects in Cyberjaya was selling like RM450 to RM500 p/sf. OSK was selling Solstice at approx RM600 p/sf. Still, I didn't mind the premium as Pangaea's original masterplan differentiated itself from others.

Now that the masterplan has been changed I don't think they deserve the premium pricing.

While it currently affects OSK buyers, the same may also affect buyers of other projects if we don't do something about it now. Developers cannot have the absolute right in amending the masterplan halfway through the project as they think or see fit as it has a direct impact in influencing buyers decision and more so when it comes to property pricing. The whole thing becomes very misleading.

i visited the pangea and mutiara ville last saturday. impressive works for pangea as i saw a group of buyers from China is being briefed for the project. The potential is there. Conceptual offers are crucial.

very futuristic, i like. can on par with mah sing The Icon PJ

Shopping mall can work or cannot work is not the main point here.
You cant charge buyers for a premium then quietly remove them.
Besides, what compensation should be given to the buyers for the premium that alr paid?
Since you are in this line - share with us your opinion in this OSK thread rather than keep promoting tamarind.

Wow so many Malls in Cyberjaya, I think very soon more than 50% will end up like Cap Square or Southgate

As for what OSK did, unfortunately the Sales Brochure do not form part of the SPA Annexure yet but with some hope and in due time, it will form a binding agreement as to what the Developer promises to build. When the time comes, Developer like OSK and even Tropicana will be in breach of the Agreement.

SA tactic yow know

Agree.The original master plan is printed on brochures, so not SA to blame. However, what annoys me is how the SA have been twisting their stories now, eg changing master plan is to add value, the mall was only an exhibition center, the street mall was the 'mall'. Total crap. Any osk SA reading this, stop twisting your stories. You think we buyers are 3 year old kids?

I also think OSKP is less likely to compensate. Now they rather put more focus on stronger marketing for Kepler and Emira.

Better act fast and harsher (make public aware, not just the owners) before they officially launch Kepler.

With the remaining small piece of land, no matter what they plan to develop on it, it's not going to be better than the original one.

This is not only affecting the owners, but also indirectly affecting other future Cyberians. 

I won't put it that way. It doesn't mean that just because they have a disclaimer in their brochure the buyers have no other recourse. It doesn't mean that the buyers cannot challenge them. The "burden of proof" will be on us if we decide to challenge them i.e. in what way, or how the buyers have been mislead