QUOTE(super_evil_alien @ Sep 20 2011, 10:00 PM)
Maemo/MeeGo usually depends on repository rather then App Store.
Yes,the repos might don't have the fancy UI's like proper App Store but you can get almost any type of application you want.
Well frankly speaking I think Maemo/MeeGo have done relatively well given Nokia have constantly neglect Maemo/MeeGo.If they gave the resource given to Symbian to the MeeGo team I'm quite sure it'll be perfectly competitive OS like iOS & Android.
I won't say Bada as bad OS.It's still have neat features & Samsung is committed to improve the OS.Also there a number of developers showing interest on Bada.So I think bada will improve in term of OS market share & quality (hardware & software wise)
I still remember how crippled Android was during version 1.6.
Give any of OS a chance to do what it's promised.Then we'll judge it.
I guess it's because people are "used" to App store, hence, other "store" concept like OVI Store, Markets, etc.
For Maemo, may I say that some/many users are not aware or know about the repository, they just visit the OVI Store, which practically has nothing much.
So, talk about easy to access? I guess those that never own or use Maemo were talking from wild guess? The repository is built into the OS and it's one of the main icon under App Manager. What's so hard to use? It's easier to access and use than what store/market, there's no LOGIN required, no credit card bs, etc. and it's all FREE. Hard to use?
The problem maybe:
1. Not interactive enough, but it can be improve... just like FAP FAP FAP man and the likes, I guess Maemo users would understand better.
2. Need to enabled "more" repositories, which include risk such as beta/testing apps, as well as, "dangerous" apps (if any).
3. What else?
It's all about understand the OS and knowing more about it. One may have moved and lock onto the mindset after using/brainwash by one powerful influencing company which successfully changes everything. (e.g. like the term jailbreak, suddenly, it becomes a normal term to use; changing mindset that it's all about apps, forgetting the purpose of a smartphone, etc).
Anyway, there's nothing wrong with preferring either OS, it's personal preference. If one prefers iOS or app centric device, which have tons of apps, there the answer is clear, just go for it.
QUOTE(super_evil_alien @ Sep 20 2011, 10:00 PM)
Personally for me number off apps doesn't represent how good the OS it.
Perfect example for this case is webOS.
But many people already been brainwash and have the mindset of apps only.
It doesn't need a good OS for apps centric device, the OS can be very simple; Just imagine a MP3 player, evolve into multimedia player which allows people to watch videos, and later, add on internet browsing and ability to install apps. That's iPod Touch? Then add in phone functionality... Does it quality it as a smartphone?
I think many "experts" out there didn't quality it as smartphone since the beginning of time, just that many people don't understand because the company already successfully changes everything, the mindset of people, it's easy to change, especially when people are non-technical.