hmm...so you trying to say mine is actually normal? cause palermo E6 processors are low voltage...was wondering if my new bios actually over volt my processor...
Sempron64 2500+ , 2800+ OC tests
Sempron64 2500+ , 2800+ OC tests
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
hmm...so you trying to say mine is actually normal? cause palermo E6 processors are low voltage...was wondering if my new bios actually over volt my processor...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2005, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
wow...nice scores you got there...
beat me flat already... |
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 11:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 06:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
ooo....will wait for new results...
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 11:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Binh @ Oct 13 2005, 09:18 AM) To whom who has a problem with HTT above 295MHz when memory divider is set to 133: Just change Row Refresh Cycle Time to 12 (or 11) by using A64Tweaker, and then use ClockGen to speed up HTT. On my rig (Semp. 2600+ E6, Abit NF-8, 2x256MB DDR400 Mosel Vitelic) I have only HTT max = 296Mhz when RRCT = 10, when I set it to 12 I can reach 337MHz with 133 divider now ! QUOTE(i love mac OS @ Oct 13 2005, 09:30 AM) doesn't pumping the Vdimm helps for CL??because i my mobo doen't have Vcore option so cant add it,just add Vdimm till 2.6 & run my ram at DDR470 CL2.5-3-3-7.....add Vdimm till 2.7 or 2.8 doesn't help for CL2.0-3-3-6(can't boot).....maybe my ram too hot,need to add heat spreader?? wow...thx...i'll try it out... |
|
|
Oct 24 2005, 06:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Oct 24 2005, 08:51 AM) not bad la dude hmm...if i do folding 24/7 can it be considered as stable?? but then again... it's just superpi 1M test... nothing much of showing stability. show some hours of prime95 screenie for bragging rights... lol! |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2005, 07:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Oct 24 2005, 10:26 PM) If you can fold, that means your system is stable but only for normal usage. It might not be the same under stressed condition. hmm...not really true wat...like you...you're having the same processor as me..but yours is like much lower than mine...33 secs to be exact and i'm getting around 38 secs....does the ram play a part in it??Anyway, I'm using the 5:6 divider. There are people who can get lower superpi timing eventhough their clockspeed is lower is because of - bigger L2 cache (if they're Athlon64) - RAM with tight timings another thing...why is that my mobo cannot run at 1T timings? issit because of the mobo or ram? cause i can see wtm do 1T on his DFI board and abit board...and can all DFI board do 1T timing? |
|
|
Oct 29 2005, 08:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Nov 7 2005, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(kimi @ Nov 7 2005, 03:53 PM) oh ok, i thought that 3 is already 2T (dunno wth it is anyway) i'll try to set it manually to 3-3-3-8 and go for 300x3 fsb, 300x8 = 2.4GHz kimi, you haf the rig specs similar to mine...hehe...able to get 7.8k on your card is not bad already...stock speed right?? for me, i get around 8k stocki better be reading threads on ram, saw a few just now on timings. and dl memtest86 as well thanks again and when OC its around 9.7k |
|
|
Nov 8 2005, 10:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(kimi @ Nov 8 2005, 08:25 AM) i tried messing around with the ram last night set it to 3 3 3 8, and the rig booted at 2.4GHz, but not stable, the rig keeps on rebooting itself?? hmm....when your rig keeps booting up, its a sign that you didnt pump enough juice into your chipset...try upping the voltage for it...i'm running now at 1.5v for my Vcore, no problems wat... i wanted to up the vcore a bit but found out that the next step up after auto is 1.55V, so what is actually the default voltage for the sempron2800+ ? (the MSI bios is reporting something like 1.4V) btw the albatron agp 6600gt that i got is no good, with the default HSF im getting peak temp around 90+C after changing to a modded athlon xp cooler and a bigger fan to cool it down, peak is <70C, idle ~50 (which is what people getting with stock cooler!) so im quite reluctant to oc the card core too much, yesterday only up the core to 525, mem at 1000, and finally getting 8000 points in 3DM03. im too lazy to rma it though coz im from out of town (bought at LYP) for the ram timings, try loosen it to 3-4-4-8....think you can hit higher HTT with that timings...cause i found out that your current timings are pretty tight for KVR rams... |
|
|
Nov 8 2005, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(wtm0325 @ Nov 8 2005, 11:15 AM) his ram wont tight becoz if 2.4ghz means his ram will run at 200mhz... kimi, did u try to run memtest86 for at least 8 rounds to test the ram highest speed can go? after checkin n confirm it's not the ram problem, u'll know it's voltage... btw sempron vdefault core is 1.4v, 1.55v is not a problem but hot lor... dun compare la sidewinderz, actually my pcmark05 is bout 3200++ oni, totally lose to u his timings is ok la actually if its 133 devider...but for me, i'm also on 133 devider but its 2.5-4-3-6...timing is pretty wierd if you ask me... |
|
|
Nov 8 2005, 07:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Nov 8 2005, 06:39 PM) Pcmark2005 dont really depent on memory speed. I runing at 133 divider giving me around 50score higher den 100 divider. really??? but why is your scores higher than mine?? oh yea...kimi, benched my card at stock speed (500/900) and my processor speed is 2600mhz (325x8.0) my 3dmark03 score is 8090 memory latency is 2.5-4-3-6 This post has been edited by sidewinderz: Nov 8 2005, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Nov 9 2005, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2005, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2005, 08:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2005, 08:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2005, 08:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2005, 09:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
sigh...every1 on DFI...hands itchy la..haha....think my next board will be DFI...antonio....can give discount??hehe...
|
|
|
Nov 15 2005, 11:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
hmm...
calculate...270x3.0 = 810mhz....that 1 is a no no...try lowering it down to 2.5x or 2x |
|
|
Nov 15 2005, 01:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Nov 15 2005, 12:13 PM) dude.... he's on nF4 ler oopps..my bad...hehe...270 x 4 = 1080MHz .... should be still okay if you don't have any problem with stability or else lower the HT multi to 3x QUOTE(Hungry_Wolf @ Nov 15 2005, 01:12 PM) yea...you're right...just that on intel, its called FSB |
| Change to: | 0.0306sec
0.40
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 09:29 PM |