EDIT:I'm getting NAD C352 second hand now.I'll probably have to upgrade the player as well...
This post has been edited by Blackhart: Jul 7 2007, 05:36 PM
Please Recommend... a Hifi Stereo System, Pls state your budget pls!!!
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 04:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
508 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
I'm thinking NAD C320BEE.I'll test it when I got the time.Is Marantz CD5001 sufficient or I should expand my budget on the CD player too?
EDIT:I'm getting NAD C352 second hand now.I'll probably have to upgrade the player as well... This post has been edited by Blackhart: Jul 7 2007, 05:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2007, 11:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
400 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malacca<-->Johor |
Are studio monitors suitable for [desktop] music listening purpose? Are they enjoyable like hi-fi speakers?
This post has been edited by Xeon7222: Jul 12 2007, 11:07 PM |
|
|
Jul 19 2007, 12:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
882 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
Hi... my friend is selling off his Kef Cresta floorstander.. i hardly see any1 mentioning Cresta in this thread.. just wondering if any1 of u have any experience with it ... Anyway advice from u guys would be much appreciated.. Thanx in advance
|
|
|
Jul 19 2007, 07:08 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
i wish to buy SACD player ...... 3K budget?
which one is better ? Marantz SA7001 Denon DCD 1500 NAD C542 |
|
|
Jul 19 2007, 10:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
14,193 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sbn / KL |
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Jul 19 2007, 12:08 PM) Hi... my friend is selling off his Kef Cresta floorstander.. i hardly see any1 mentioning Cresta in this thread.. just wondering if any1 of u have any experience with it ... Anyway advice from u guys would be much appreciated.. Thanx in advance Is it Cresta 30? However, it isn't the best from Kef. iQ is the more popular series. |
|
|
Jul 19 2007, 11:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
508 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 10:08 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(Blackhart @ Jul 19 2007, 11:13 PM) NAD C542 can't play SACDs, it decodes HDCD though.I haven't heard the others so I can't help you in that. i know, NAD C542 cant play SACD, but last time i heard the demo, NAD C542 compare with Marantz 7001, the sound is not big different... that why i maybe will choose NAD, cos is cheaper then i can buy power cod at the same time. |
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 10:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
508 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(babemys @ Jul 20 2007, 10:08 AM) i know, NAD C542 cant play SACD, but last time i heard the demo, NAD C542 compare with Marantz 7001, the sound is not big different... From what I've heard the Marantz sound signature is bright and forward while the NAD is more laid back.Also consider whether SACD playback is important to you or not.If not so, you can save money with NAD and get HDCD playback as bonus that why i maybe will choose NAD, cos is cheaper then i can buy power cod at the same time. |
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 11:16 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(Blackhart @ Jul 20 2007, 10:31 AM) From what I've heard the Marantz sound signature is bright and forward while the NAD is more laid back.Also consider whether SACD playback is important to you or not.If not so, you can save money with NAD and get HDCD playback as bonus mean Marantz SA7001 KI Signature more better than Marantz SA7001? but i heard from others guy say, if use SACD player to listen CD is better than CD player, izzit true ? if i consider to buy NAD (about 1.5k) , ermm ........ do u have any recommend with others brand almost same grade and price with CD player? This post has been edited by babemys: Jul 21 2007, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 11:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
14,193 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sbn / KL |
imho, it doesnt make a diff if you are spinning CD in SACD player as the player is more meant for SACD discs itself.
|
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 11:40 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(htkaki @ Jul 21 2007, 11:35 AM) imho, it doesnt make a diff if you are spinning CD in SACD player as the player is more meant for SACD discs itself. now i use Denon 3805 AV Amp and B&W CDM2, if i use AV amp match with CD player and SACD player,dunno can match or not? or i have to buy another Stereo amp to listen Song? This post has been edited by babemys: Jul 21 2007, 11:42 AM |
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 11:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
14,193 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sbn / KL |
It's ok if you aint fussy. Multi-channel music like DVD-A needs AV receiver to fully optimise its potential.
|
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 11:51 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
mean my AV amp can use to listen CD?
sorry, my eng is q poor ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 12:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
508 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(babemys @ Jul 21 2007, 11:16 AM) mean Marantz SA7001 KI Signature more better than Marantz SA7001? Don't know the difference between KI Signature and without but i heard from others guy say, if use SACD player to listen CD is better than CD player, izzit true ? if i consider to buy NAD (about 1.5k) , ermm ........ do u have any recommend with others brand almost same grade and price with CD player? Nolah SACD player seldom performs better than a dedicated CD player for redbook CD playback if they are within the same price range.More cost is spent on improving the redbook playback quality rather than splitting between that and SACD. Usually the NAD C542 is compared with Cambridge Audio Azur 640C for performance and price range.Of course the sound signature is different, to me its thinner but punchier than the NAD. QUOTE(babemys @ Jul 21 2007, 11:51 AM) Of course AV amp can be used for stereo listening but a dedicated stereo amp should do a better job at that, if you're not fussy about that and are planning to use it with video and multi channel audio then stick with AV amp.But get a good one This post has been edited by Blackhart: Jul 21 2007, 12:47 PM |
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 01:18 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
thank a lot .....u reply me ..
|
|
|
Jul 21 2007, 01:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,104 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: NUS,Singapore |
|
|
|
Jul 23 2007, 09:46 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(songhan89 @ Jul 21 2007, 01:32 PM) Added on July 23, 2007, 2:56 pm QUOTE(Blackhart @ Jul 21 2007, 12:45 PM) Don't know the difference between KI Signature and without if u wish to buy CD player ....Nolah SACD player seldom performs better than a dedicated CD player for redbook CD playback if they are within the same price range.More cost is spent on improving the redbook playback quality rather than splitting between that and SACD. Usually the NAD C542 is compared with Cambridge Audio Azur 640C for performance and price range.Of course the sound signature is different, to me its thinner but punchier than the NAD. Of course AV amp can be used for stereo listening but a dedicated stereo amp should do a better job at that, if you're not fussy about that and are planning to use it with video and multi channel audio then stick with AV amp.But get a good one NAD C542, Audio Azur 640C, Denon DCD 1500 which one u will buy ? This post has been edited by babemys: Jul 23 2007, 02:56 PM |
|
|
Jul 23 2007, 03:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
508 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(babemys @ Jul 23 2007, 09:46 AM) I don't know exactly which model was it but it was around the same price range,I did not like the Denon player so much.Azur 640C was okay but the thin sound was kind of weird for me so I picked the NAD C542, the HDCD bonus did not hurt either |
|
|
Jul 24 2007, 05:14 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
8 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(Blackhart @ Jul 23 2007, 03:45 PM) I don't know exactly which model was it but it was around the same price range,I did not like the Denon player so much.Azur 640C was okay but the thin sound was kind of weird for me so I picked the NAD C542, the HDCD bonus did not hurt either Thank for your opinion .... Added on July 26, 2007, 2:11 pm QUOTE(Blackhart @ Jul 23 2007, 03:45 PM) I don't know exactly which model was it but it was around the same price range,I did not like the Denon player so much.Azur 640C was okay but the thin sound was kind of weird for me so I picked the NAD C542, the HDCD bonus did not hurt either if NAD C542 compare with Pioneer DV989 for play CD? Cos Pioneer DV989 got DVD and SACD, if i buy Pioneer, i can save $$ and no need to buy another DVD player liao ... This post has been edited by babemys: Jul 26 2007, 02:11 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,479 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Hey all,
I'm planning to setup a budget hifi for music listening with the following.... Epos ELS3 NAD 315CEE 1. The Epos specification says that it the speakers are "4 Ohms nominal", would there be any problems pairing with the NAD amp? 2. What are the sound signatures of the amp and speaker? I have read much on the Epos, but there is very limited information on the NAD amp. 3. With a budget of 2.5k, do you think this is the best bang for the buck setup? thanks for reading/replying! PS: What's the market price for the NAD 315CEE currently? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0171sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 10:37 AM |