Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 1v1,2v2,3v3,4v4?, big event, big prize pool

views
     
TSTimber2k7
post Apr 8 2011, 09:53 AM, updated 15y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


sorry i have to recreate this since i forgot to unlock it for people to post comments. and i've added the option to vote for 1v1 and 2v2 to see what sc2 players in malaysia really want.

from previous topic.
QUOTE
apparently there is a tourney coming up soon with prizepool over 30k here in malaysia, it is now up for u guys to decide whether it will be a 3v3 or 4v4 tournament, but only between these 2 format. i personally suggest and vote for 3v3, as 4v4 in my personal opinion is broken.


feel free to voice out your opinion.
quest_5692
post Apr 8 2011, 10:10 AM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
lol, the sponsor should really open up their big eyes, starcraft is all about 1v1. team games are awful. team games in starcraft is like 1v1 in dota.
XenoFr3ak
post Apr 8 2011, 10:19 AM

Bazooka Joe
******
Senior Member
1,393 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Dust


Yea .. i heard about the huge SC2 event as well. So i voted for 1v1.
Quazacolt
post Apr 8 2011, 10:29 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(quest_5692 @ Apr 8 2011, 10:10 AM)
lol, the sponsor should really open up their big eyes, starcraft is all about 1v1. team games are awful. team games in starcraft is like 1v1 in dota.
*
team games can be fun to watch so long it is executed properly, and/or casted properly.
its definitely much difficult than 1v1 given how diverse sc2 strats and executions can go.

personally id go 2v2/3v3 max if team games. 4v4 is just a huge cluster f*** and imagine 4 people doing multi location drops etc, how is the caster gonna handle that? rofl.
TSTimber2k7
post Apr 8 2011, 10:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


In my personal opinion, i would prefer 1v1, and also want the malaysians to engage in 1v1 competitively, not reside to team games just because they cant win 1v1, the result will be the same when high lvl 1v1 players forms a team to compete. However 1v1 could be stressful at times, which is why many of us play team games most of the time.

i think, allocation of money should be spent accordingly to the area that will reach the largest amount of people
Quazacolt
post Apr 8 2011, 10:46 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Timber2k7 @ Apr 8 2011, 10:43 AM)
In my personal opinion, i would prefer 1v1, and also want the malaysians to engage in 1v1 competitively, not reside to team games just because they cant win 1v1, the result will be the same when high lvl 1v1 players forms a team to compete. However 1v1 could be stressful at times, which is why many of us play team games most of the time.

i think, allocation of money should be spent accordingly to the area that will reach the largest amount of people
*
i see what you did thar. wwwwwwwwww
TSTimber2k7
post Apr 8 2011, 10:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


what did i do? hahaha
heaven
post Apr 8 2011, 10:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
369 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
well, i'll go for 3v3 or 4v4, since i know my level in 1v1, generally those who go 1v1 are either "really know what is at stake" or "just for the fun of it".
keretapir
post Apr 8 2011, 11:08 AM

rampant public indecency
******
Senior Member
1,143 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: not everywhere..but somewhere..


i think 2v2 is semi-fun & semi-serious.
if 1v1,seriousness level would peak to ridiculous levels, while 3v3 & 4v4 would result in goofiness & erratic, unconventional strategies. some lulz example would be all-in worker rush sweat.gif

& since 2v2 generally played on smaller maps, i think it's easier to cast them too
TSTimber2k7
post Apr 8 2011, 11:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


it can also be "what would u like to watch", although high lvl 1v1 players may not necessarily win team game, but the skill in 1v1 is still relevant and they are the most likely to win it.
heaven
post Apr 8 2011, 11:14 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
369 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
I think 2v2 also gives more variety due to race mix, without going into the gang bang range of 3v3 or 4v4.
Quazacolt
post Apr 8 2011, 11:29 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(heaven @ Apr 8 2011, 10:56 AM)
well, i'll go for 3v3 or 4v4, since i know my level in 1v1, generally those who go 1v1 are either "really know what is at stake" or "just for the fun of it".
*
ish you still lurk over the forums? btw we should try to game sometime. got more friends whos into ladders and im sure you have a couple of yours too. oh and download/hook up mics etc, easier (and more fun too with retarded chatters!) to co-ordinate/game biggrin.gif


Added on April 8, 2011, 11:30 am
QUOTE(Timber2k7 @ Apr 8 2011, 10:47 AM)
what did i do? hahaha
*
naw its kewl, some people can be really sensitive to take a jab/joke/troll. wwwwww

This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Apr 8 2011, 11:30 AM
The Amateur Working Bee
post Apr 8 2011, 11:31 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,646 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
why not just have 1v1 and 3v3/2v2?

split the prize half for 1v1 and team match.


heaven
post Apr 8 2011, 11:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
369 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Apr 8 2011, 11:29 AM)
ish you still lurk over the forums? btw we should try to game sometime. got more friends whos into ladders and im sure you have a couple of yours too. oh and download/hook up mics etc, easier (and more fun too with retarded chatters!) to co-ordinate/game biggrin.gif
Sure, tho my gang dun use mic, we do Blitzone Saturday night regularly(not sure this week due to stuff), or just play the game till u know what your ally will do and go with the flow.

QUOTE(The Amateur Working Bee @ Apr 8 2011, 11:31 AM)
why not just have 1v1 and 3v3/2v2?
split the prize half for 1v1 and team match.
*
yeah, seems awesome with that.

This post has been edited by heaven: Apr 8 2011, 11:40 AM
SiewKaiz
post Apr 8 2011, 11:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


1v1 ftw
mules
post Apr 8 2011, 12:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
seriously??? 30k for team game?
Off course it will be fun to watch cause it differ from all the gsl hype, whoever comes out with ingenious strategy will roll all the way and will set the standard in team game. Casting will be hard but in the end it is the caster experience that counts on where to focus.

I truly love to see this happen. Epic and a new light for the team game lover.
Overlord will be new hero smile.gif as it give sight to the warp tech. Resource sharing will create impossible early tech like never be seen before. Marines will rules again smile.gif
Koroster
post Apr 8 2011, 12:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


1v1... Dowan to switch this into another dotard event
SiewKaiz
post Apr 8 2011, 12:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(mules @ Apr 8 2011, 12:01 PM)
seriously??? 30k for team game?
Off course it will be fun to watch cause it differ from all the gsl hype,  whoever comes out with ingenious strategy will roll all the way and will set the standard in team game. Casting will be hard but in the end it is the caster experience that counts on where to focus.

I truly love to see this happen. Epic and a new light for the team game lover.
Overlord will be new hero smile.gif as it give sight to the warp tech. Resource sharing will create impossible early tech like never be seen  before.  Marines will rules again smile.gif
*
seriously team game for tourney........... =.=a 3v3 4v4 in sc kinda retarded
2v2 still acceptable

keretapir
post Apr 8 2011, 12:10 PM

rampant public indecency
******
Senior Member
1,143 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: not everywhere..but somewhere..


& still,only 2 ppl vote for 2v2..me included... sweat.gif
quest_5692
post Apr 8 2011, 12:57 PM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Koroster @ Apr 8 2011, 12:03 PM)
1v1... Dowan to switch this into another dotard event
*
quote for truth

QUOTE(SiewKaiz @ Apr 8 2011, 12:06 PM)
seriously team game for tourney........... =.=a 3v3 4v4 in sc incredibly retarded
2v2 still acceptable
*
fixed

on side note: Blizzard tailored this game mainly for 1v1 as we can see from our recent patches, blizzard fix racial imbalance base on 1v1 games. everyone knows how broken the game is when it goes to 2v2, 3v3 and hell.....4v4? well, 2v2 is ok but you cant compare it to 1v1 still.

if the sponsor really want big team games, maybe they can consider changing it to GSTL clan war styles? at least there are still alot of strategies revolved. there will be snipings, mind games on which player to go up next....the coaches are like pokemon trainers fighting with 5 pokemon each. ONE BY ONE


Added on April 8, 2011, 12:59 pmowh ya, and if its for rm30k prize pool, it should be something serious. not something that is fun.

This post has been edited by quest_5692: Apr 8 2011, 12:59 PM

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0453sec    0.58    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 11:13 AM