1v1 only.

2v2 game is bad when the opponent is both zerg and both go for 6 pool

i would agree wit 1v1 or 2v2...
3v3 and 4v4 will depend on who can mass T1 units and group them the fastest especially on some maps...

IMO 2v2 is ok...

Like with my partner, we can work out quite a number of strategy against each build. Like I go Tank and he go for Marine in a easily defended map or i Macro up and control the main army of me and him while he just focus on harassing. Kinda fun

-

This post has been edited by Timber2k7: Apr 8 2011, 06:34 PM

satu versus satu

buy one cheap cheap rm10-30, plug in the cc pc lo. (though arent cc these days using headset now that comes with mic? could just use those)

---

Added on April 8, 2011, 7:08 pmpretty f***ing much, and yeah the biggest hurdle for this (should team game be decided) is where/how the obs/caster be focused on. 1v1 is difficult enough, team game just adds to that difficulty even more

This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Apr 8 2011, 07:08 PM

just wanna say starcraft cannot be a team game, dota is a team game

Team game team game..~~!! nice

team game in sc2 =.=a

1v1 & 2v2 ftw ~

Do it like tennis. You want team games, then make it a separate category. Team games always have less cash prizes, due to the level of skill required. I dont know why organizers fear supporting multiple categories. We've done 1v1 and 2v2 flawlessly. Its no big deal if its handled properly. Keep 2v2 games s.e and 1v1 d.e if you have to and balance the prize pool to support which ever you feel would need the support. Further breakdown 1v1 into 2 levels for further development and keep track of players and teams so you know who should be in what category. Fix the community level so that they continously grow, not halt the advance of better players and wait for the rest to imrpove to their level.

there are more stuffs coming in that are still unannounced, thanks brian for ur insight, ure my idol ;p , im still learning the ropes

Haha, gamers should stay gamers till they cant game anymore, like me.. Sudah tua. Then we think about keeping our favorite games and communities alive.

Thank you for your support

Much appreciated!

I would say 1v1, since Starcraft II IS mainly a 1v1 game. 2v2 is fine tho, just not 3v3 or 4v4.

i guess im 1/2 way there already hahaha, can no longer put in much focus playing. When opportunities come i'll have to grab it before some1 else does, plus im tired of waiting for that some1 also.


hi greenwood, i think this thread is already irrelevant since smm has already decided to go ahead with 3v3, however don't fret cuz this is not the end of it, it's not like there wont be any 1v1s coming up from us, as i have said it before the 3v3 state tournament is only a part of the program to promote sc2 around msia. Just take it as, something extra.

this SMM 3v3 tournament news is up on alot of other countries' sc2 forum....i think i saw it on gosugamers too IIRC....

yeah i know, and the all godlike mrblue deleted my post explaining the 3v3

all in all i think the global starcraft community is treating this as a joke.

doesn;t matter what they say, not open for them to join anyway