If they have permit issue that will affect KR1 too. Is that right ?

---

Added on November 10, 2011, 3:03 pmWith one of the nearby condo heavily infested by termites, any of these condos ( KR, Z, RAINZ etc ) taking special measures to stop the invasion of termites ?

You know every house will have enough wooden furnishing, and you don't want your beautiful and sweet home requires spraying of termite chemicals everywhere and turning it into a poisonous house right ?

This post has been edited by puchongite: Nov 10 2011, 03:05 PM

Do you think you could succeed with such a call for boycott ? The insider job system was there in KR1 and nothing has happened to the agents and the insiders, all of them pocketed the money and laughing all the way to the bank.

Malaysia’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) had fallen 13 places to 60th place since 2009. Our politicians everyday goreng all kinds of success stories but the fact is that all the big time corruption cases are happening everyday in front of our eyes.

After looking at the model of the building, I noticed that in term of road access, KR2 is not really much better than the rest. Because there will not be a road access to Jalan 1/155b (bukit jalil to kesas). The main gate of KR2 is going to open towards jalan 3/155, and that is the same road which Bukit OUG, KR1, Rainz, ZR people are going to use.

Sorry if I gave you the impression that the car road access is better than the rest, I retract that. The car road accessibility is almost the same as Bukit OUG.

No intention to spoil the good name of the developer. How come these posters in this threads haven't received their stamped S&P :-

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=46194440

Are you one of those who have "jalan" when you purchased KR1 or you followed the usual registration process ? You may skip this question if you don't want to answer.

Thanks for giving us this first hand information. I am happy for you.

Another thing of interest to me is that do you know if THIS developer forfeits the initial deposit if the loan could not be approved ?

I think this is where people could abuse the system. Imagine a middle man overbooked 10-20 units and later claimed that his loan could not be approved and in the mean time seeks under-table money from other potential buyers .....

Regards.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 6 2011, 11:19 AM

And the other factor is the developer's image.

Appears to be clouded with delays in S&P, slow projects progress, rampant under table money practices, first time doing high-rise etc. Any ways these are just suspicions.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 7 2011, 02:47 PM

It's a Community Hall. The signboard says.

If there are so many people register interest, it's the developers duty to manage the process in a fair manner.

The "queue" method is terrible, I object to it. People hire others to queue at the office nights and days, some even weeks for it. Some people cut queue by paying the people queuing there; so just when you think you hired someone to queue for you, you never know this person gets a bigger money from someone else to cut queue.

Pay 10% to secure unit before pre-launch and priority pick - not sure what is that exactly. Might not be effective after all.

I am not sure if the developer could enforce forfeiting of booking fees if loans not approved ( especially those people who booked multiple units ) and make names non-transferable. I would say these two measures are effective in reducing "middle-men".

---

Added on December 8, 2011, 7:38 amIf Europe cannot pull through the debt crisis, the market will head for a crash. Time for "economic correction" ! The market needs this from time to time.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 8 2011, 07:38 AM

Recover so fast ? Then I strongly "encourage" it to go for a correction, healthier after that. The market is mad now, and the thing is, it is unstoppable .... Only a crash is able to correct it !

---

Added on December 8, 2011, 12:24 pmIf only the developer's higher management could only hear our voices, they just have to implement 2 simple measures :-

1. Booked names not transferable.
2. Forfeit booking fees if loan got rejected.

It will put an end to all the fat hopes of these blood suckers.


This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 8 2011, 12:24 PM

You got the truth, but the partial truth. From what I see, it does not appear that developer company and the agent company receive under table money, however, it does not rule out that individuals from the companies accept under table money.

Firstly, we are not sure how the developer allocates units to "internal people", and secondly we don't know if these units are convertable to an external sales and so on and so forth.

I have already received information that a big chunk of KR2 has already been blocked by internal people. I don't believe the internal staffs are rich enough to indeed purchase them under their personal names, as this is already the second project.

We only call for a clean and fair booking process.

And to accomplish that, the developer must facilitate by :-

1. Make bookings non-transferable. If it is employee purchase, S&P must carry the employees name.
2. Forfeit booking fees if loans are not approved.

If the developer is not doing the above, the developer's sincerity is questionable, the developer is assisting the foul play.

This is where we distinguish credible developers from not-so-credible developers.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 8 2011, 04:31 PM

That means OUG Parkland is not credible. 我鄙视它！

Sorry not a Iphone user.

But about the launch, someone mentioned in another thread, it will be Jan. Is that right ? Or someone has already bought under-table units ?

This is the biggest problem. Initially I thought KR2 could access bukit jalil directly, that will give it advantage, but the model provided by the developer showed that the road access is the same as Bukit OUG.

Exactly, you have gone into the details which I thought about too. I am afraid it's going to be a normal T-junction. Since Jalan 3/155 is on the higher ground, this road which joins jalan 3/155 will also be at about the same height, so those condos will have the parking at the lower levels, and cars will spirally drive up to the higher level to join jalan 3/155.

And yes, there will be queue right at the T-junction. There will queue at jalan 4/155 extension into bukit jalil, there will be queue at jalan 1/155b. There will be queue at Kesas. Everywhere !

It will be wise for ZR, RAINZ, KR1 and KR2 to quickly revise the plan to make 3 car parks for each unit. Bonus to all the buyers. Set a precedence to Malaysian condo history.

Bukit OUG is already built, nothing can be done.

KR2 exit is the same as bukit OUG, into Jalan 3/155, on different side of the road.

Yes KR2 is able to exit to bj, but I don't call it "directly". "Directly" to me it means KR2 use the park-and-ride land/road to enter Jalan 1/155b. It's a matter of different terminology. Hope we can be in sync.

Cheers.

Are you saying there is another exit or there will be another exit from the west of jalan 4/155 to kesas ?

I am not aware of that though.

As far as I know the west of jalan 4/155 is going to be connected to bukit jalil highway ( is already today connected but it will be made a proper road ).

This post has been edited by puchongite: Dec 24 2011, 11:06 AM