QUOTE(Duckies @ Mar 27 2011, 03:06 AM)
There is a poll here before comparing the rate of Phat PS3 which has YLOD compared to PS3 slim.U will be surprised to look at the results.
But then some PS3 phat still survived after 3-4 years of using and that's rare.We have seen too much complains and cases of PS3 phat getting YLOD and thus we gave u such advice.
Well,it's ur money so it's ur choice.U got ur own reason and we respect it.We r juz saying that it's not worth but it's ur call anyway

Ok bro, where can i view the polls plse
Added on March 27, 2011, 9:48 amQUOTE(dark_heart07 @ Mar 27 2011, 07:46 AM)
my brand new 40gb Phat only serve me for 1 1/2 years before YLOD.and now using 120gb Slim for almost 2 years without problem.better get a new one.
Bro, heard that phat 80gb is better than 40gb, dun know how true is that..btw, as for now, ur new slim is only additional half a year without a problem comparing ur old phat..no doubt it is a gud sign, i dun deny the fact that the new slim is more reliable than the old phat since as time passed by sony has been able to improve its console technically while at the same time reducing cost...so in terms slim vs phat, definitely its the slim...maybe i should rephrase my q lol for those who cant afford a new slim, how does a phat reconds fare ? That is actually i want to know, for eg supposed we currently dont have the slim ver now, we have to live with only the phat one..did all the issue of phats technical problem like ylod looks more apparent bcoz we r making comparison with a new technically improved version or were the problems were already being debated at their time (ie when slim ver is still not around)?
This post has been edited by eazea1: Mar 27 2011, 09:48 AM