QUOTE(ahpingko @ Feb 22 2011, 03:56 PM)
dun facepalm me. The Sony Alpha Thread V50!, The Orange Legion
The Sony Alpha Thread V50!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 08:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(cyruz13 @ Feb 22 2011, 08:55 PM) price with kit lens is Rm2699 - Rm2799. Anyways, Get it quick. Stocks running out again. Some shops might still have it now.Added on February 22, 2011, 9:14 pmWhat photoshop do you guys use? This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 22 2011, 09:14 PM |
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 09:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Melv @ Feb 22 2011, 09:18 PM) Guys, talking abt A580....recently i was in langkawi and i walked in to a camera shop. Asked the person for A580 and she said got stock, but what shocked me, she said the price was RM2000 for body only!!! No lah. Impossible. Stocks already so limited, Price wont come down for the time being. Maybe its second hand. |
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Ksano @ Feb 22 2011, 09:27 PM) Go get it wow, which shop is that? should boycott it.But make sure they show you everything on package. Just make sure its not a550 I heard somewhere where a person book for a580 at a shop. But in the end the shop say no stock. Force that person to buy a550 instead. If not, the deposit money is gone |
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
![]() In a hotel in Miri. Without a tripod. This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 22 2011, 09:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 09:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 10:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
heard the sal16105 is extremely sharp at wide angle, but extremely soft at telephoto. Anyone who is owning or owned this lens can clarify this?
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 06:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(yuhi @ Feb 22 2011, 10:36 PM) yeap, alot of reviews say its not very sharp at the telephoto end 105. But at the wide angle end its on par with the 1680Z Yeah. Thats what I read about.QUOTE(hazril @ Feb 23 2011, 12:01 AM) willing seller,willing buyer...i used to work in a camera shop...i can sell it at cost price maa...whats so wrong about it... I didddddd. A review site said its soft at telephoto end but at wide angle its http://www.dyxum.com/ » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sony_1...6_m15/page4.asp This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 23 2011, 06:52 AM |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 02:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 02:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
Reviews for Tammy 1750
http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/Tamron..._review268.html negative: Slightly heavy Images worse in low light (a flash is highly recommended) Needs to be at least f4 to be sharp throughout Noisy AF compared to other lenses Gotta be at least f4? Then the 16105 is better eh? Based on reviews, The SAL 16105 is better. Anyone that owned or is owning these two lenses please tell me which you feeel is better and why Added on February 23, 2011, 2:57 pm QUOTE(momuchi @ Feb 23 2011, 02:48 PM) SAL55200 and beercan.This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 23 2011, 02:58 PM |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 02:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(cyruz13 @ Feb 23 2011, 03:02 PM) Arghh! Yeah. But its only 17-50. If it was 17-70 i'd buy it. QUOTE(8tvt @ Feb 23 2011, 03:05 PM) Yaaa. How ahh? Where to test? If I go to studio zaloon can test one kahAdded on February 23, 2011, 3:24 pm QUOTE(azamunekurone @ Feb 23 2011, 03:21 PM) i owned Tamron 17-50 f2.8 before and had a chance to "pinjam" my friend 16-105 to compare with for a week..what can i say is Hmm.. This is good. Low light condition for me is alright. I have F42 flashy. Heard the 1750 build quality is very bad eh. For the 16105, Gearstripping??! Tamron 17-50 f2.8 - hunts badly in low light (bad iq),need af assist light from flash/a700 above - soft a bit at f2.8,at f4 its good sharp (but not so sharp).but,u got extra f stop if emergency cases - bokeh is so,so biasala - all range good! - bad rubber grip.easily peel off after 1 year using it - no gear strip issue SAL 16-105 f3.5-5.6 - at 16-17mm f3.5, at 18mm f4 at 18mm - sharp at wide open at wide focal lenght - bokeh is so,so biasa sangat - soft end @105,sharp range is between 16-70 - good IQ for fast focusing - 2 of my friend had a gear strip issue Which do you prefer overally? QUOTE(Codyx @ Feb 23 2011, 03:21 PM) 1750 nice nice for me....excellent for everyday uses....only own one lens now and very satisfied with it(beside the zoom range) Right. Its the zoom range problemhehe...JMHO This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 23 2011, 03:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 03:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(cyruz13 @ Feb 23 2011, 03:41 PM) 16 and 17 make not much diffferent.. IMHO ... Yes, 1mm is nothing. Cz manyak expensive looo i got tammy 17-50 for a year ++ liao.. i abandon my kit lens 18-70 i used to consider WA lens... so i go try Tammy 12-24.. and at 12.. not much different also.. =/ ... at least.. not as i expected.. end up no buy lol or u want... another good lens.. i dont hav.. but i suggest u go for CZ 16-80 AWSM lens yo! This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Feb 23 2011, 03:47 PM |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 03:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 03:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(azamunekurone @ Feb 23 2011, 03:53 PM) depends what u are shooting..now im not that much use the range from 17-50 since i change my way of shoot (zoom with my feet).i also now own Konica Minolta 18-200 as my kit lens Hmm.. I dont really need the extra f stop because I already have the 50mmf1.8. But I dont really need the 55-105 from 16105 cuz I already have the 55-200! Arghh! How??! if u think wanna get a travel lens, SAL 16-105 is a good lens.forget about all rounder lens as the quality of all rounder lens are not so good as this lens.. but if u think,sometimes u need a better f stop, tamron 17-50 f2.8 is a good lens.sharpness u can kawtim with potoshop ma..dun wori! still,.. sony lens does not offer the f2.8 zoom lens for apsc.just hope the new announcement for a77 with 16-50 f2.8 SAM |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 04:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 04:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.3348sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:10 PM |