QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 3 2011, 12:27 PM)
cool liaoand it is mobile.
rapier is mobile too.sort of
Military Thread V6, Selamat Hari Raya dan Kemerdekaan ke-54
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 03:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2011, 03:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
^what warplanes? T-28?
|
|
|
Mar 5 2011, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 5 2011, 01:39 PM) Should we join 5th generation fighter program just like indonesia and singapore....? there should be something we can do.such as software conversion and tropical variant of PAK-FAi'm voting for malaysia to join PAKFA program... whos know we might get to make certain part in PAKFA just like A400M... but meh.... |
|
|
Mar 5 2011, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
looks like some FN variant
|
|
|
Mar 7 2011, 12:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2011, 01:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(99FoxDemon @ Mar 7 2011, 01:12 PM) just remember... since when ATM got humvee into their inventory... i thought they use land rover like british... those are not humveesbut they said if in US they called that humvee but yesterday they mention something else forgot what they call that thing... and we only buy a handful of those(as opposed to tens of thousand of Defender in ATM service.and thousand more annuallyTDi usually) Land Rover Defender is <3 |
|
|
Mar 7 2011, 06:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
iranian 155mm SPH
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() looks rather basic,yet practical i think think we can do this too.doesn't look hard(PSC ND can build howitzer,and deftech can build the truck.the FCS is well....manual) |
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 02:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
^lol
btw my favorite Rock band will played again! |
|
|
Mar 9 2011, 02:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(sleep_snore @ Mar 9 2011, 02:01 AM) it would be nice if we join the japs program.. but iiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnbbbbbbb4 tony pua said it would be 9000% expensive.. the Japs are more than capable to produce their own fighter without other assistancei wonder will the and knowing their armament,it's going to be expensive as hell. remember F-2? it's essentially a F-16 with the pricetag of F-15 |
|
|
Mar 9 2011, 05:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
^i lol
|
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 11:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(lulz @ Mar 9 2011, 07:01 AM) actually everything made in japan is bloody expensive,due to labor wage,the amount of sophistication in it,and the fact that unlike F-16(which Lockheed Martin outsource from everywhere all over the States),most of F-2 is made under one roof,and there's is only a handful of them to begin with.i don't buy the 'duit masuk kroni' reason because it's a real shame (to you,your family sampai la 7 keturunan) if a jap is caught songlap money.a large portion of politician/businessman/CEO who was caught end up comitting suicide my problem with F-2 is that it is a wrong platform to begin with.F-16 was never developed as a maritime strike aircraft.if one did some study on F/A-18,the USN actually reject F-16 because they cannot withstand the stress in the sea,thus the reason F/A-18,then YF-17 being brought back from dead and being develop further to become what we know as the best multirole,maritime strike,day/night aircraft ever invented. other single engine aircraft like A-4 and A-7 only existed because at that time,the software sophistication is not advance enough to develop a true multirole aircraft.thus the's the F-designation,the A-designation and the E-designation Added on March 10, 2011, 11:09 pm QUOTE(heavyduty @ Mar 10 2011, 05:42 PM) i wonder why people say malaysian SF are poor when we use MP5s..and think we should replace them with MP7s..urghh as if they even have saw the gun in close...This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Mar 10 2011, 11:09 PM |
|
|
Mar 13 2011, 10:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
what's wrong with defender?
|
|
|
Mar 13 2011, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
IED was a threat even for heavy armoured vehicle,simply because they attacked the most vulnerable part of the vehicle:lantai
comparing a defender with HMMWV isn't that much correct btw. they are being develop to meet different aspects(Defender is more of an all round utility vehicle while humvee is designed so it cannot be toppled over due to it's sheer width) we used Defender as multi purpose utility 4x4 vehicle,not as Recon vehicle(we got g wagon for that),apatah lagi as a front line vehicle.besides MRAP isn't that much of a great IED-proof APC themselves |
|
|
Mar 14 2011, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
^foot patrol in urban area? buat apa?
Added on March 14, 2011, 1:10 pmbtw if one see our lads in Timor Leste and Lebanon all wear body armor during patrol This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Mar 14 2011, 01:10 PM |
|
|
Mar 17 2011, 01:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
there's nothing small with SAR21...
|
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 04:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
even being hit by large catastrophe the japs continue their generosity towards other
SANKYU NIHON!! |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 10:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2011, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2011, 08:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 06:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(ZombieSeafood @ Mar 29 2011, 12:25 PM) Just finished reading the Dasar Pertahanan Negara over a bowl of shisha. I must say, I found it very agreeable, and politically neutral (lol neutrailty is a rare commodity in Malaysian politics), which is good. Among others, one thing stood out though- despite the recognition of the asymmetrical threats, I find it perplexing that not much is mentioned with regards to inter-agency cooperation ie. Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency, Special Branch, etc. about the inter agency coorporation,you got to dig deeper well into insurgency periodAn interesting read, after my project on Canadian defence policy. Any thoughts on the DPN? inter branch coorporation within MAF is always good(which is a must in today's conventional-oriented,limited warfare) |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0604sec
0.50
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:59 PM |