If i don't see noise on my 27inch monitor printed also confirm no problem, i have printed some iso6400 pic at A4 size before, no problem with the noise at all... for those of you who never print your photos don't be so particular about the noise

SB900 only overheats for those who don't know how to use flash, it won't overheat under normal usage, i have yet to get overheating after 1 year of using

---

Added on February 6, 2011, 5:59 pmSorry bro don't take this seriously, i am not pointing at anyone .. what i am trying to advice others is don't be so particular about the noise if you don't print in big size .. I certainly appreciate your effort in posting 100% crops for both, guess this --> is not a good emotion icon

This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 6 2011, 05:59 PM

Forgot about that, slower aperture=bigger flash power needed, somemore zoomed to 200mm sure need a lot of power.... time to get VR2

If only it's as sexy as the fujifilm x100

If i am not mistaken the KLIMS is not yearly event

U need heavier body

Sometimes heavy is bad for prolong shooting , i am beginning to miss the weight of my D90

Normally shorter lens will always have shorter MFD, this is what i found out most of the time...

D90 iso1600 still acceptable, D300 i am not so sure, maybe a little worse

Hehe muddy compared to D700? ........ performance still oklar if compared to D80

Selling my sigma 24-70 HSM, anybody interested can view the link on my signature

This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 11 2011, 07:21 PM

Hehe sooner than what I thought as well, wanna fund for 16-35 f/4vr

I decided to get 16-35 for the reasons below

1. Got VR ( very important feature for me, can do handheld slow shutter, can't do that with 14-24 )
2. Lighter and longer range ( Till 35mm, which is still good enough for walk around, while 24mm is still very wide )
3. Cheaper
4. Can put filter/CPL while the protruding element of 14-24 is really scary



This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 11 2011, 10:13 PM

If want to compare build quality of course use 14-24 lar, 16-35 is afterall not their top WA lens

Check out my Sigma 24-70 lor, the only 3rd party lens that;s cheap and very good quality

Hehe boasting mar then can get new lens lolz

16-35 F/4 VR... together with 70-200 will be perfect for me, i don't miss the 35-70 range

Well this is just for me, as i found out i always need the extra range for portraits... Most of the time i will be using my 70-200 anyway, the WA is just for few of the shots

Sold my lens, will be getting 16-35 f/4vr next wednesday

Lol ok will remind him when i see him next week, will be collecting my friend's 24-70 as well