QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 12 2011, 06:19 PM)
Feels like eternity for lens purchase, time for u to get 24 1.4G Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 06:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 13 2011, 01:15 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 13 2011, 02:38 PM |
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 07:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ Feb 13 2011, 06:48 PM) nikkor AF-s 105 VR macro len cost more than rm2500++ So that means the tamron sp90 is better than the 105 micro since it got more stars or tamron af 90 mm macro only rm1100++ review give tamron 90mm more star compare to the N series of nikkor in macro competition hope this helps |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 08:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
ON side note , anyone using Black Rapid camera strap here?
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 10:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 13 2011, 10:43 PM) That one also look tough weh -.- but still break. A few times see jor those kinda stuffs break. Haha yeahyeah, i sold my UD35 once i got the D700 You always see my carry FS400 because I bring 70200 mah LOL~ plus shoulder bag ... quite tiring if carry long. |
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 03:27 PM) I could get it around 3.3k(much cheaper than in M'sia I'm supposed? Malaysia can get around RM3500 for 1.4D, somehow i like the built quality of the D more than G. The D is lighter as well but not all people like the washed out colour of it compared to the G Really have to try it myself then. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 02:51 PM) If I have battery grip, should I get it off or have it on always ? For those who do a lot of portraits, the BG is a must, mine never leaves the camera... If u think dun need BG with lens, then your lens is not heavy nor big enough If the event 30 minutes, so what ? It's good for vertical grip. Show off ? Yesh to those idiots not to those who always shoot portrait. Add on : it helps to balance up my camera too whenever my 70-200 is there. And those who think no need, probably, the lens is not heavy. 1. 70-200vr2/80-200 f.28 2. 24-70 F/2.8 nikkor 3. 14-24 f/2.8 nikkor Prime lens still ok but except those super telephoto prime lens Added on February 15, 2011, 4:15 pm QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:12 PM) Don't ever regret when u see the G lens colour This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 15 2011, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:24 PM) PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 15 2011, 04:27 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:31 PM) Thanks! Lol u go try 85 1.4D and 85 1.4G wide open i am sure u will buy the G lens right away, the D lens is quite soft at 1.4 compared to the G lens Am just a hobbyist and want a 85 that can be use wide open without problem. I won't consider the G at all as it is too expensive. I just want a lens that I know is money well spent and will have me to blame for the bad photos instead of the gear was not up to par and regret later on. But will try it out at BTS myself to see the difference. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:32 PM) Wait till they have friends with another lens then they compare and regret QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM) 70-200mm VR has much noticeable difference from the 80-200mm, the first is thing is weight, then the focusing speed, and with VR.... handheld on close subject with slow shutter speed is possible, and the quality is simply amazing. Continuous focus speed is blazing fast... overall,... really Actually the 80-200 is heavier from what i feel but the specification sheet says otherwise, 70-200vr2 is very well balanced while the 80-200 is very front heavy But the price |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM) As if I'm not hobbyist ! Let him regret his purchase later, 1k to me is very little for a lens And 1k different expensive meh ? Can spend 3k for a lens can't spend extra for better ? LMAO. Anyway, as you like |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0245sec
1.05
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 03:54 AM |