QUOTE(ezrasang @ Feb 14 2011, 09:35 PM)
Location: Malacca, right in front of the church. Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 14 2011, 11:36 PM) Funny lah. If achievable, what's the whole point of dreaming then So do you face the light leak problem?Put something not so easy to achieve as your dream. To be honest, I was dreaming of having a 24-70G few months ago, and now I have it. I was like W*F when I think back now. LOL! |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 12:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(ukiya @ Feb 15 2011, 12:48 AM) Wondering does Nikon Center such as BTS there provide any firmware upgrade services for my D7000? Risky? Plan DIY, but i m heard its risky! It's as easy as A,B,C! Just need to reformat your sd card and save the file to the root and put it back to your camera and let it do the rest. What so risky about that? |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 10:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(ukiya @ Feb 15 2011, 01:33 AM) My friend do have such issue. Den he send it to shop for warranty. Wondering is there anyone facing such scenario before? Installation fail!? What they mean is that for extreme case of like battery ran out of power during installation, you just need to follow the instructions and there's absolutely no risk. If you can't even do such a simple thing I wonder how would you get thru the challenge of your life. Well, I read it somewhere... There's risk if the firmware doesnt install properly. Although risk consider very very very low but it doesn't resist the potential of causing the camera become malfunction. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
Are there any battery grip for d7000 yet?
I want it for balancing the weight, longer battery life and show off. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 15 2011, 03:00 PM) Going to the middle of March. The shop I went only have the first batch of d7k, so ask them to order a new body for me How much is the MB-D11? Anywhere to get the cheapest price? And how much are each of the battery? Also have heard that the 85 1.8D is only usable from f4 onwards, anyone here use it in a DX before? Wanna buy it to use it wide open, if it's true might get the 1.4D instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 15 2011, 03:08 PM) some1 just cited the price in the above post. Yeah it is pretty good for it's price, but some reviews says there's very bad CA and soft focus below f4. 1.4G is too expensive for me and little bit flare is okay for me so don't need that nano coating. okay bro.. looking forward for your D7k. My dream camera I thought 85 1.8 is pretty good for it's price. else you can get 85 1.4 D or 85 1.4 G if you have enough money. buy buy buy.. hahahaha Nano coating is healthy Will try out the BG when i purchase it now that i know it existed The later I purchase it the more I look around and the more I would ended up spending. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 03:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 03:23 PM) Tested ! Worth or not depends mate. I feel worth but at the same time I will say no as well because I don't usually do portrait ! I could get it around 3.3k(much cheaper than in M'sia I'm supposed? Really have to try it myself then. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 03:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
can always PP the color and the D color is okay to me.
your poison didn't work!!!!!!!! HAHAHA |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM) It's about double or more than double the price of 1.8D; Worth or not depends on the person who will be investing in it. Thanks! The best is to test out yourself at Nikon BTS, they have the 1.8D, 1.4D and 1.4G; Test out yourself and see/feel the difference and whether its worth to pay for it. If you're photographer earning $$$, it might be worth to get the G as you will get your return on investment; But if you're a hobbyist or not earning much, then it depends on your budget and how much you're willing to pay,... also, probably how detail-conscious you are? Sometimes, people don't really look/know the details but they just want to get the best there is; If they have the $$$ then it's not a problem, else, they should think more properly whether it's to pay the extra bucks. Whatever your choice, most important is for your to test out yourself; In the end, it's still just a tool, it depends on your skills and how you utilize it. If one day you found its limitation and wishes to upgrade, I "believe" you can still sell the lens at good price. Am just a hobbyist and want a 85 that can be use wide open without problem. I won't consider the G at all as it is too expensive. I just want a lens that I know is money well spent and will have me to blame for the bad photos instead of the gear was not up to par and regret later on. But will try it out at BTS myself to see the difference. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM) PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best woooo, you're one bad fella to be with! I'm not a pro and not making $$$ with my gears so that little bit difference in color is okay to me. How much is the G around Klang Valley, think it's gonna be too pain for me! Talking about telephoto, how about the 70-300? it's cheap and it's quite sharp apparently. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM) what third party? I mean the nikkor 70-300 Added on February 15, 2011, 4:38 pm QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM) Then they will sell and buy again which mean they spend more moolah instead Sharp for the money! hahaha 70-300 sharp meh ? side by side with 70-200 and see of course the 70-200 gonna be sharper, but again, I'm just a boy not yet a man! it's almost 3.5k more! This post has been edited by pikipiki: Feb 15 2011, 04:38 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:38 PM) Haha, didn't know you're not replying to me as you didn't quote any and your reply is right after mine.Anyway, i'm only a student and don't have a rich dad. It's my savings from allowances and jobs plus some investments. So yeah I know i'll be drooling for the G but I'm ok with the quality of image I see with the D and see some comparison of the color of both the D and G, I find myself ok with the D color just that the G performs much better with back lit situation. Who doesn't know the newer tech and the newer lens are better? Just that i have my budget and I'm buying it for my hobby so there's no need to buy all the top lenses in order to enjoy it. But then, never know, some of my trades can suddenly come good and boom I'll be buying a G! At the moment, D is fine for me. |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 04:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Feb 15 2011, 04:53 PM) lol don't feel down le. I also don't have rich dad and all but striving Nice link. Thanks. anyway, this link is something you should look forward to... he is also a decent guy with a decent glass take a look at some of his works and the PP is amazing that people begging it to be sold and tutorial on it. http://www.flickr.com/photos/swarmoeskerken/ I wish someone drop some money on the floor! Like a few one thousand singapore dollar note. Woo!!! Then I'm gonna buy all the top nikkor! |
|
|
Feb 15 2011, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
How cheap can I get a CS5?
Should I be a pirate? HAHA |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0427sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:28 AM |