Feb 28 2011, 05:18 PM
QUOTE(skystrike @ Feb 27 2011, 06:00 PM)
lol
QUOTE(Belphegor @ Feb 27 2011, 08:29 PM)
lol
QUOTE(Sheep319 @ Feb 27 2011, 08:31 PM)
lol
QUOTE(choy89 @ Feb 27 2011, 09:29 PM)
lol
QUOTE(ReAcTiVo @ Feb 28 2011, 12:41 PM)
lol?
QUOTE(skystrike @ Feb 28 2011, 02:14 PM)
lol
QUOTE(maxizanc @ Feb 28 2011, 02:22 PM)
lol???
QUOTE(CityBluePrint @ Feb 28 2011, 04:52 PM)
Since somebody corektz this thread from the dead it would be appropriate for me to substantiate what was said QUALITITIVELY about Webb's bias or not.
http://www.soccerbase.com/referees/referee...4&season_id=139
And what was pictorialized and spotlight in
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9379989.stm
Does that prove that Babel's POV QUANTITIVELY that out of 10 games that Webb reffed at OT MU was favourably awarded 5 penos (5 to 1 ratio)
If you look at Webb's PL ref stats for the last 20 PL games he was involved in he awarded only 5 penalties.
Now does that prove that Babel was punished unfairly for expressing a corretz POV?
lololololololololololololololololololololololololololol http://www.soccerbase.com/referees/referee...4&season_id=139
And what was pictorialized and spotlight in
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9379989.stm
Does that prove that Babel's POV QUANTITIVELY that out of 10 games that Webb reffed at OT MU was favourably awarded 5 penos (5 to 1 ratio)
If you look at Webb's PL ref stats for the last 20 PL games he was involved in he awarded only 5 penalties.
Now does that prove that Babel was punished unfairly for expressing a corretz POV?
Quote
0.0136sec
0.26
5 queries
GZIP Disabled