Which model? d700 or d7000?

I didn't do much in singapore.
1 day trip w/o sleep very tiring..
well at least could produce decent quality picture. IMO

I do realize there is a ghost there, but IDK the ghost make it nicer IMO.



I didn't sleep at all, waiting for down to break. Playing with a bottle of milk in Singapore street, Jalan sultan to be exact.



Overall I am happy w/ the quality of my new 35mm 1.8 lens. My very first prime lens

In my opinion
(+)
it is nice as if when you sit in the table together w/ your friend you can still snap them w/o move out from the table Lazy body! what to do..
a very good value of money I would say. especially mine was Rm 600

(-)
Yes, KTCY is correct again. not a very sharp lens therefore I sometimes go for f.2.5/2.8 to get the sharpness. but still.. Hmmm...
when I was in universal studio the model guards are often told me "Please not to stand very near to the model" yeahh.. it's 35mm what to do.
I will post some picture when I was in universal studio. later.
anyway C&C highly appreciated.


hey guys, any feedback about babylens? IDK I found it fascinating.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 2 2011, 05:05 PM

yeah... it's lacking of sharpness.
Thanks for the feedback

^
Good for you go for FX model
prepare the next load of money for those N lenses. muahahahaha xD

---

Added on January 2, 2011, 5:47 pmand gold ring lenses of course

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 2 2011, 05:47 PM

N stand for Nano coating.
the lastest technology of Nikkor lenses.
they made 1 extra coating called nano coating (of course the name tell us how small and thin the coating is yet it's so expensive, because nano technology the latest technology in the world CMIIW people still doing research about it to bring up the whole France's electricity use only nano technology) <- CMIIW I am just an IT student, I read it from media source

the purpose of N coating is to protect lens from ghost.
therefore you wouldn't have ghost like what I had in this picture


if you see it clearly you would be able to see 'greenish' color ghost in my picture.

N lenses will prevent that.
whether it works fine or not? I am not sure. I haven't own a single of them.
you can ask other nikon gear-ful sifu for that.. hahaha

Hahaha.. sure thing. exactly the same condition apply for me.

no no no..
what I mean is http://www.nikon.com.my/productitem.php?pid=1401-6f4f90483f
http://www.nikon.com.my/productitem.php?pid=1381-25212782d6
and http://www.nikon.com.my/productitem.php?pid=1370-5835c04823
did you see a big N word there??

those are Nano coated lenses. ghost prevention lenses. CMIIW

No worry I am making mine. Nikon mount 70-200 f/1.0
damn geng..! muahaha
If only I could

---

Added on January 2, 2011, 6:22 pmhey bro.. take a look at this.
I is true.
it's DIY able.. muahahaha

http://freephotostuff.blogspot.com/2008/03...amera-lens.html

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 2 2011, 06:37 PM

^
I am not sure any lenses.
so far only Nikon apply that Nano coating. CMIIW

for me. I am not ready for TT session yet.
I only have 1855 and 35.
even if there are a lot of models.
I must be mentally shocked with either CY or KTCY 70200

I thought you can DIY that?
I not a very good flash player still.
I mean I don't have a body to do commander mode, so I can't really play around with strobist thinggy.
thinking to get d90.. although I know it's not a very wise decision

hahahahaha... yeah, share experience will be nice.
having a model w/ big guns.? it will freak me out

IDK just feel like mentally shocked. hahaha..
yeahh. small lens for small body like mine


hahaha.. yeah d7000 would be nice.
but no money for the time being and I very poisoned with strobist thingy. it's awesome. for me.


anyway I tested out 85mm 1.4 on my d3100 body,
I have feeling it's a lil too big. like holding massive rambo gun. IDK what will happen if I hold 70200
it has nice built in quality but I do feel it's a little too 'tele' for DX sensor. IMO

---

Added on January 2, 2011, 6:57 pmI couldn't see why we are not okay with canon user. you are welcome
hahaha.. or it's just me.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 2 2011, 07:09 PM

same again!

the only reason we don't find it suit is because we still use DX model.
cannot do anything. hahaha

It saves your photo's metadata,
metadata is all information regarding your photo e.g vocal lenght, iso, aperture, etc etc..
therefore when you want to edit it is easier and manageable, because without having the actual metadata editing software e.g photoshop will measure by itself, which actually not correct due lacking of information in the JPEG itself.

by saving ion JPEG you actually ask your camera to compress your picture, and JPEG is a lossy compression.
further reading here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression

RAW is still a compression method but they are depends on camera body (some is lossless data compression some also lossy data compression) but again as I told, it hold the photo metadata unlike JPEG, this makes it nicer when you want to edit the photo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_data_compression

again. I am not 100% sure. but at least this is what I know. I learn from my college.

---

Added on January 2, 2011, 8:14 pmPP stands for - Post Processing
the concept is as easy as whatever processed *again* after the process of taking photo is considered PP.

Photoshop, Lightroom, ViewNX2, even building adjustment on your camera consider post processing tools

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 2 2011, 08:14 PM

aw.. lovely fish eye lens.
Happy New year!!

should I sell my 35 1.8 and go for Sigma 50 1.4
confuse here.. anyone could give some enlightening?
value of money which one better?

---

Added on January 3, 2011, 10:52 amanyway upgrading Memory card (e.g from class 4 to class 10) does it give significant improvement on the image writing?

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 3 2011, 10:52 AM

yeah.. that's true.
yesterday, I did PP and almost increase the sharpness of every picture I taken with 35mm 1.8.
not really satisfy with the sharpness yet very happy with the bokeh it delivered.

is 50 on DX only good at taking picture? I mean if you want to include a little background w/o move back too much is that possible?
kind of confuse about the focal range.

50mm does it mean the focus is 50 millimeter from the object? where as 35mm means the focus is 35 millimeter from the object?
it's kinda confusing for me because sometimes, for 35mm I can shoot a very near/very far object and both have the focus.

need some advice on here. sifu KTCY

how about the distance bro cy??
is it really different? sometimes when I snap using 35mm, I heard people yelling at me and told me not to be very near with the model (yeah amateur photographer shouldn't be that near to the model, wait till I become pro all the model want to stay near to me )

ohh, if let's say I didn't do burst mode that much I should reconsider upgrade my mem.card?

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 3 2011, 11:34 AM

Not group shooting. it's universal studio's model. kind of panda in kung fu panda and etc. my bad being stubborn to use my 35mm.
70mm? well. I will consider that.
Thanks for the advice again. you are really helpful


Owwhh 15cm difference? doesn't really make difference. I mean I could move back a bit somehow. hahahaha
Thanks for the advice again. you are really helpful

that is the tough part. I guess I need to learn more w/ my 35mm
thanks!