Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong

views
     
aldosoesilo
post Jan 10 2011, 07:36 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Jan 10 2011, 07:00 PM)
i totally agree with the above saying ... we just need to stop being a gear head and make do with what we have ...
*
very true bro.
gotta stop being gear minded and appreciate what I already have blush.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 10 2011, 07:44 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 10 2011, 07:38 PM)
and stop reading forums and start shooting  whistling.gif
*
I just come back from shooting one larr yesterday
Pretty decent result tongue.gif
working day can't do much of shooting.. hahaha
aldosoesilo
post Jan 11 2011, 11:16 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(weirdo88 @ Jan 11 2011, 06:54 AM)
user posted image
*
I like the feeling captured together smile.gif
great job
aldosoesilo
post Jan 11 2011, 11:44 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Jan 10 2011, 07:46 PM)
where are the pics from ur shooting ???    brows.gif
*
QUOTE(alvinX @ Jan 10 2011, 07:54 PM)
Yay!! rclxm9.gif  but sigma's which may disappointed u guys. But Im happy with my lens after all!
Hey... No time to waste , just spam!
How much ur cost? And carbon one.. Est damage?
*
sorry couldn't online last night.
user posted image

user posted image


Added on January 11, 2011, 12:13 pmC&C Please..

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 11 2011, 12:13 PM
aldosoesilo
post Jan 11 2011, 01:33 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(nicky1112001 @ Jan 11 2011, 10:13 AM)
hai..how long the shutter light can be use?i am using around 10k now...normaly is use until when?
*
shutter light or shutter count??
if shutter count depends on your body.
aldosoesilo
post Jan 12 2011, 10:09 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


^
bro I've checked mine. there is no lcd bleed. forgotten to tell you tongue.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 13 2011, 12:14 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(iman_210 @ Jan 13 2011, 10:45 AM)
care to share why want higher FPS?
*
when I ask a friend of mine the exact same question.
he said because he is a sport photographer where every moment is necessary so he just burst it. tongue.gif

guys. I wonder why lens with bigger aperture consider as fast lens.
e.g 50mm 1.4 <- Nikon called it fast prime.
does a bigger aperture has any effect on focusing speed??
aldosoesilo
post Jan 13 2011, 02:20 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 13 2011, 12:19 PM)
Bigger aperture so ur shutter is faster......!
*
isn't that faster focusing speed?

QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 13 2011, 02:05 PM)
The term 'fast lens' refers to lens with big aperture, more light faster shutter.
*
less light harder focus?
isn't it more logical to say less light faster focus? sorry noob.
anyway why tamron 1750 focusing speed is worse than 1855 nikkor?
even tamron has a bigger aperture
aldosoesilo
post Jan 13 2011, 05:38 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 13 2011, 02:23 PM)
Like I said, fast means BIG aperture. f/1.4 you can use 1/200, f/2.8 you probably can use 1/50 only.

This is the what 'fast' define. And another thing to note is that, with f/1.4 lens, the DOF is shallow for the focus system to acquire as compared to a f/2.8 lens.

Besides, Tamron 1750 is well known as a slowpoke lens in focusing especially low light.
*
so the bigger aperture doesn't determine focusing speed isn't it? Thanks for the clarification.

QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 13 2011, 05:08 PM)
U juz haven get into the situation, where that damn tamron can't lock focus!! hahaa..... in-out-in-out-in-out.......
anywayz how's ur 35mm focusing speed compared to 18-55mm?
*
my both lenses 1855 and 35 have experience can't lock focus.
1855 can't lock focus in my campus indoor event. honestly less light only some side light is turned on by my campus. freaking frustrated because I thought my lens is spoiled ady back then. (Noob in photography blush.gif )
where my 35mm can't focus in super dark room with some glowing accessory on the wall. I guess the glowing thing is not bright enough.. Hmm shakehead.gif


Added on January 13, 2011, 5:39 pm
QUOTE(iman_210 @ Jan 13 2011, 05:20 PM)
burst but cn the sensor and lens cope? i mean u r just bursting without composing right?

imagine those days with film camera how do they capture sports photography...
*
he did composing if not mistaken. the result is good as well.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 13 2011, 05:39 PM
aldosoesilo
post Jan 14 2011, 12:58 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 14 2011, 12:00 PM)

Added on January 14, 2011, 12:24 pmAnybody playing around with the built in flash commander set to -- with juz the speedlight illuminating the subject? I've set to --, but it seems the pop up flash still impacts the end result of the subject lighting(lights the subject from front when i place my slave speedlight on the left). Anybody here can share some experience?  icon_question.gif  blush.gif
*
I wrap my pop-up flash with paper so it almost give no impact tongue.gif


Added on January 14, 2011, 1:56 pmany recommendation of camera strap else than crumpler?
it doesn't looks professional if use crumpler tongue.gif

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 14 2011, 01:56 PM
aldosoesilo
post Jan 14 2011, 02:31 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


^
it will be great to have both.
it won't use a convenient strap but looks like kid's toy.
do you get what I am saying??
and strap doesn't have any relation with camera anyway.
and I don't get it why you seems so sensitive when I say professional looks. doh.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 14 2011, 03:11 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 14 2011, 02:28 PM)
use optech strap tongue.gif
*
I will give it a try

QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 14 2011, 02:36 PM)
When u r into photography, there is nothing u will relate to outlooks..... I'm juz teasing u, nth sensitive  sweat.gif
I heard Optech is quite comfortable too....
*
Lol.. so you are saying go for a kid's toy look as long as it gives you comfort?
I think I will look more about optech.


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 14 2011, 03:02 PM)
Use original strap.
*
itchy. I think I should replace it ASAP tongue.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 14 2011, 05:22 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


Edited.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 14 2011, 05:44 PM
aldosoesilo
post Jan 16 2011, 03:57 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Jan 16 2011, 02:09 AM)
i just bought my first lens for my d3100 yesterday biggrin.gif .. nikkor 35mm f/1.8g (rm770) + nikon 52mm uv filter (RM90)
... is the filter and price ok?
at first the shop recommended marumi uv filter for RM60.
*
The price is reasonable for me.
aldosoesilo
post Jan 16 2011, 09:03 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


user posted image
spam!
aldosoesilo
post Jan 17 2011, 11:56 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


^
I do interested to sharpening my skill on weeding of course.
can I do that? w/o payment is fine by me.
aldosoesilo
post Jan 17 2011, 12:05 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


^
can you please send me the event details etc etc.
and I will give you the response.
I know it is tiring but for learning purpose why not. anyway I am not going to be the main photographer. I am just shooting around learning and learning is that okay with you?
since I have no experience and chance of doing weeding photography at all.


Added on January 17, 2011, 12:12 pmand I don't want to ruin that historical day of yours

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 17 2011, 12:12 PM
aldosoesilo
post Jan 17 2011, 12:43 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


anyone has an idea about the price of 2nd handed 70-200 2.8 VRII?
aldosoesilo
post Jan 17 2011, 03:01 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Bliz @ Jan 17 2011, 01:48 PM)
Usually around Rm6300, buy new one la, only RM6800.. Already spent 6k++ don't mind paying a little bit more for a new one + longer warranty  brows.gif
*
Bro. 70-200 on DX is it useful?
I need honest opinion. sad.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 17 2011, 03:14 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(shinjun @ Jan 17 2011, 03:03 PM)
Depends on your intention to shoot with the lens. smile.gif
*
QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Jan 17 2011, 03:04 PM)
i've got smth to say here. u need to know what you want to shoot first. 70-200 on a DX would be more tele than on a FX. obviously u still get the sharpness and the f/2.8. in fact, u get more corner sharpness than on the FX coz it's just using the center of the lens.

now u'll need to decide whether you need that range. who knows u might need a UWA instead of a rather tele lens?
*
yeah DX will make it super-tele instead of tele isn't it? as it give 1.5 crop factor.
I am thinking to have tele lens for candid shooting and some event like motor GP and football or sometimes when model hired! brows.gif

13 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0432sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 09:53 AM