QUOTE(Babizz @ Nov 20 2016, 07:55 AM)
there are several key problems here.
1. pace of development has been very slow in the past n could be the same moving forward.
2. no banks financed this project thus far shld be a major concern
3. convention centres dont increase rentability at all
4. with mrt3 only coming in 10 yrs, the convention centre will probably be underutilized
5. road access for met n the whole dutamas will become much worse with the current road being very jammed up even before mrt completion.
6. too many high end apartments in KL, too few tenants
7. 1 anchor of the office tower connected to met1 will nt have any tenants tht cn afford to rent here.
for your point 2, u mean no bank is financing Naza for this project, or there is no bank to finance the buyer for MET 1?
for point 3, i dont think convention center will be dead if there is no MRT. reason being is that it is targeting at different kind of people everytime. it is not like commute to work that same people have to do everyday and not having it will be a make or break deal. exhibition on the other hand is different as it target a specific group of reach for every exhibition. say like Oil and gas, automotive, food industries, etc. I think they dont mind to take taxi, uber, grabcar. even my staff earning less than 3 k took uber to work. so what's the problem?
having convention center may not increase rentability, but it does increase the profile of the area. it is not a tenant puller, but it is a crowd puller which will vibrate the whole area. just like residence with golf course nearby (not necessary view), it didnt attract the tenant, but it is a good profile.