QUOTE(JackNg1985 @ Jan 25 2011, 10:50 PM)
hehe, for mugen door visor, would help u to ask, see got ot not ❤ LYN Proton INSPIRA: Owners/Fan Thread V3 ❤, INSPIRA > Everything | Got your car yet?
❤ LYN Proton INSPIRA: Owners/Fan Thread V3 ❤, INSPIRA > Everything | Got your car yet?
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 10:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
104 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,376 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
1.8cvt and 2.0 cvt,which fc was better
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,326 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Ukay Perdana |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,554 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
649 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM) if different drivers, depends on the foot not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpmif same driver using both cars, theoretically the 2.0 has better fc since it has more power to push the heavy car as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM) the 4b11 can use from ron91 and aboveThis post has been edited by ckk125: Jan 26 2011, 11:50 AM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,554 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM) not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpm Thanks. So what is the conclusion ? as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am the 4b11 can use from ron91 and above |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,376 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
So 2.0 gives better fc rite
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,620 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
2.0 =1.8mt in fc less than 1.8cvt as paper spec.
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,376 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
In real life
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,620 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
kapultek,
like tht if paper spec shud be a real reference, if in real life very difficult as it depends on the driver and how he tekan the pedal. |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,326 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Ukay Perdana |
QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM) true.. fuel also plays a role but he asked for 1.8 & 2.0, so consider every variable same laQUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM) not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpm interesting find there bro.as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am the 4b11 can use from ron91 and above never knew a different in CC would mean different in characteristics as well QUOTE(DM3 @ Jan 26 2011, 12:18 PM) manual has better fc since less power loss in the tranny, hence u don't really need to push it more to get the same speed/acceleration as the 2.0 |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
649 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 12:29 PM) true.. fuel also plays a role but he asked for 1.8 & 2.0, so consider every variable same la yea..was finding out about this while considering for either 1.8 or 2.0interesting find there bro. never knew a different in CC would mean different in characteristics as well manual has better fc since less power loss in the tranny, hence u don't really need to push it more to get the same speed/acceleration as the 2.0 End up with the 2.0 because the earlier peak comes in quite early and good for town use. |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 12:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,554 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 12:35 PM) yea..was finding out about this while considering for either 1.8 or 2.0 Seems 2.0 will be best choice among the variants for city rides. Rite ? End up with the 2.0 because the earlier peak comes in quite early and good for town use. This post has been edited by SteadyPana: Jan 26 2011, 01:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 01:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
649 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 01:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,326 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Ukay Perdana |
if you've drove a lesser car before & won't notice the details, both would seem the same.
but if you've drove 2.0L or higher cars & very meticulous on the details, the 2.0 definitely is better i chose the 1.8L simply because i needed a car urgently that time |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 01:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,376 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
Got 3k discount for 2010 1.8 cvt
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 01:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,329 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 02:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,326 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Ukay Perdana |
if too much power, of course higher FC.
but then again, maybe i'm wrong. should have some mathematical proof for this la |
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 02:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
641 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: KL~ |
Just done my first service @ kampar...they say im the 1st inspira to be service there...and they seem can't set the next service reminder for me....
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 02:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,620 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
theres a way to reset it to the mileage u wan for the next service, came across it on some forums like lgtc, mitusbishi forums.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0318sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 08:15 PM |