Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ❤ LYN Proton INSPIRA: Owners/Fan Thread V3 ❤, INSPIRA > Everything | Got your car yet?

views
     
Sh@rty 5
post Jan 26 2011, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


QUOTE(JackNg1985 @ Jan 25 2011, 10:50 PM)
Anyone know where to buy inspira door visor mugen type at Klang Valley. And also lamp cover lip.
*
hehe, for mugen door visor, would help u to ask, see got ot not tongue.gif
kapultek
post Jan 26 2011, 11:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,376 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


1.8cvt and 2.0 cvt,which fc was better
apache_utara
post Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM

:: 35mm ::
*******
Senior Member
3,326 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Ukay Perdana



QUOTE(kapultek @ Jan 26 2011, 11:04 AM)
1.8cvt and 2.0 cvt,which fc was better
*
if different drivers, depends on the foot

if same driver using both cars, theoretically the 2.0 has better fc since it has more power to push the heavy car tongue.gif
SteadyPana
post Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,554 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM)
if different drivers, depends on the foot

if same driver using both cars, theoretically the 2.0 has better fc since it has more power to push the heavy car tongue.gif
*
Usage of RON 95 and RON97 ?? hmm.gif
ckk125
post Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM)
if different drivers, depends on the foot

if same driver using both cars, theoretically the 2.0 has better fc since it has more power to push the heavy car tongue.gif
*
not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpm

as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm


Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am
QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM)
Usage of RON 95 and RON97 ??  hmm.gif
*
the 4b11 can use from ron91 and above

This post has been edited by ckk125: Jan 26 2011, 11:50 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
SteadyPana
post Jan 26 2011, 12:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,554 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM)
not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpm

as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm


Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am

the 4b11 can use from ron91 and above
*
Thanks. So what is the conclusion ? unsure.gif
kapultek
post Jan 26 2011, 12:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,376 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


So 2.0 gives better fc rite
DM3
post Jan 26 2011, 12:18 PM

INSPIRATOR
*******
Senior Member
6,620 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
2.0 =1.8mt in fc less than 1.8cvt as paper spec.
kapultek
post Jan 26 2011, 12:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,376 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


In real life
DM3
post Jan 26 2011, 12:28 PM

INSPIRATOR
*******
Senior Member
6,620 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
kapultek,
like tht if paper spec shud be a real reference, if in real life very difficult as it depends on the driver and how he tekan the pedal.

apache_utara
post Jan 26 2011, 12:29 PM

:: 35mm ::
*******
Senior Member
3,326 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Ukay Perdana



QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Jan 26 2011, 11:44 AM)
Usage of RON 95 and RON97 ??  hmm.gif
*
true.. fuel also plays a role but he asked for 1.8 & 2.0, so consider every variable same la
laugh.gif

QUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 11:49 AM)
not only that, if u compare both torque curves, the 2.0 has 2 peaks..one at 2.5k rpm and another at 4.25k rpm

as for the 1.8, it has 1 peak, which is at 4.25k rpm


Added on January 26, 2011, 11:50 am

the 4b11 can use from ron91 and above
*
interesting find there bro.

never knew a different in CC would mean different in characteristics as well
hmm.gif

QUOTE(DM3 @ Jan 26 2011, 12:18 PM)
2.0 =1.8mt in fc less than 1.8cvt as paper spec.
*
manual has better fc since less power loss in the tranny, hence u don't really need to push it more to get the same speed/acceleration as the 2.0
laugh.gif
ckk125
post Jan 26 2011, 12:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 12:29 PM)
true.. fuel also plays a role but he asked for 1.8 & 2.0, so consider every variable same la
laugh.gif
interesting find there bro.

never knew a different in CC would mean different in characteristics as well
hmm.gif
manual has better fc since less power loss in the tranny, hence u don't really need to push it more to get the same speed/acceleration as the 2.0
laugh.gif
*
yea..was finding out about this while considering for either 1.8 or 2.0

End up with the 2.0 because the earlier peak comes in quite early and good for town use.
SteadyPana
post Jan 26 2011, 12:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,554 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(ckk125 @ Jan 26 2011, 12:35 PM)
yea..was finding out about this while considering for either 1.8 or 2.0

End up with the 2.0 because the earlier peak comes in quite early and good for town use.
*
Seems 2.0 will be best choice among the variants for city rides. Rite ? rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by SteadyPana: Jan 26 2011, 01:03 PM
ckk125
post Jan 26 2011, 01:06 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Jan 26 2011, 12:58 PM)
Seems 2.0 will be best choice among the variants for city rides. Rite ?  rolleyes.gif
*
should be, but i havent drive the 1.8 before..so cant comment
apache_utara
post Jan 26 2011, 01:42 PM

:: 35mm ::
*******
Senior Member
3,326 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Ukay Perdana



if you've drove a lesser car before & won't notice the details, both would seem the same.

but if you've drove 2.0L or higher cars & very meticulous on the details, the 2.0 definitely is better

i chose the 1.8L simply because i needed a car urgently that time
tongue.gif
kapultek
post Jan 26 2011, 01:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,376 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Got 3k discount for 2010 1.8 cvt
DaBestOne
post Jan 26 2011, 01:58 PM

-LYN- 6 ★STARS★ Trader
******
Senior Member
1,329 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.



QUOTE(apache_utara @ Jan 26 2011, 11:32 AM)
if different drivers, depends on the foot

if same driver using both cars, theoretically the 2.0 has better fc since it has more power to push the heavy car tongue.gif
*
And I always thought that higher Cc is more fuel comsuming compared to lower Cc hmm.gif
apache_utara
post Jan 26 2011, 02:02 PM

:: 35mm ::
*******
Senior Member
3,326 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Ukay Perdana



if too much power, of course higher FC.

but then again, maybe i'm wrong.
should have some mathematical proof for this la
laugh.gif
opera33
post Jan 26 2011, 02:10 PM

Don't Look Here
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL~



Just done my first service @ kampar...they say im the 1st inspira to be service there...and they seem can't set the next service reminder for me....
DM3
post Jan 26 2011, 02:15 PM

INSPIRATOR
*******
Senior Member
6,620 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
theres a way to reset it to the mileage u wan for the next service, came across it on some forums like lgtc, mitusbishi forums.

126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0318sec    0.53    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 08:15 PM