Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !

views
     
adriancs
post Dec 17 2010, 05:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



^^ if you use it stupidly... like TTL, matrix metering, then aim it with diffuser dome upwards, in a big church wedding... AND fire it like a machinegun... Every 2nd shot is a full cap dump... then it will overheat.

But so many things MUST go wrong before it happens... SO... if you do happen to use it that way... like I saw some idiots at KLIMS... then you're asking for trouble and probably shouldn't be allowed near any flashgun.
adriancs
post Dec 17 2010, 05:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(chobo @ Dec 17 2010, 05:22 PM)
anyone tried Nikon NC(neutral color) filters before...? some said it's good... and they're quite cheap....  hmm.gif
*
NC is not UV. Nikon UV is marked 37c. Its multicoated, and good, thin ring filter. Its good if you're just using it for protection, but it wont serve the purpose of UV filter which is to cut down on the purplish cast haze on bright sunny days outdoors.
adriancs
post Dec 17 2010, 10:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 17 2010, 09:31 PM)
For flash imo its always advisable to get the high end one straight on, no need to think about upgrading later on unless there's a new model of course tongue.gif
*
Get those Profoto 10kW hotlights then. Even the highest end speedlight is like a keychain torchlight compared to it. You'll never need to upgrade. Can even fry eggs with it.
adriancs
post Dec 18 2010, 01:16 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



Better flash is SB800. Same price and size and weight as SB700, but more powerful than SB900. Only thing you lose is the cycle time which is useless, since too fast cycling causes overheating anyway. And you lose some ergonomics in terms of easy access buttons.

Why did Nikon have to discontinue their best flash ever and replace it with an inferior model???
adriancs
post Dec 18 2010, 07:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



^^ Pity your victims a bit lah... Flash flash flash till they go blind... I've never used the 5th battery thingie. In fact, never used anything in the box besides the flash and the diffuser. The rest is kept for resell value.

But... looking at the SB900... I think no need to sell. I'll keep my SB800s till some better stuff comes around, or when my old puppies get fried.
adriancs
post Dec 19 2010, 05:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 19 2010, 01:45 PM)
Damn tired of shooting already... this 2 weeks really shooting week for me LOL.


Added on December 19, 2010, 1:47 pmQuestion to the D300/D700 owners, have you guys burst with 8fps before? How many pics does your buffer hold?
*
On a fast card like extreme 3 jpeg normal only you'll get about 25 to 30 shots. Raw probably about 17 frames. Either way. Once you hit the limit it'll reduce to 2-3 fps, depending on how fast it can write to card.


Added on December 19, 2010, 5:45 pm
QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 19 2010, 02:02 PM)
Nice, few months back i tried the non HSM version but didnt really like it. Too heavy and big (82mm filter!) laugh.gif. Got quoted for RM2150 without filter sweat.gif. Then tried the tamron equivalent also and didnt like the built quality, feels too cheap blink.gif so in the end bought the Nikon 24-85mm F2.8-4. Not a constant 2.8 aperture but the built quality really makes me confident to buy it, plus has a macro option so not all that bad laugh.gif  tongue.gif
*
The discontinued nikon afs 24-85/3.5-4.5 is a better lens if you ask me. Yet again another example of one step forward, two steps back by nikon.

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 19 2010, 05:45 PM
adriancs
post Dec 20 2010, 02:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



I've been using sanyo and powerex 2700mAh for years and my flashes are well used and still have not managed to kill them yet. The only problem with high capacity cells are that the self discharge rate is high.

These high cap cells also charge the flash caps faster, therefore reducing your cycle time. Together with bad practice of fast frequent full dumps, you can see why the cells are being blamed.

Bad usage kills flashes, not good batteries. Whoever told you high capacity batteries damage flashes is an idiot. They'll blame everything except seeing that the real problem is the idiot holding it.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(kiroz @ Dec 21 2010, 09:54 AM)
Any razor sharp lens for portrait shots? I'm kinda unsatisfied with not-so-sharp kit lens (18-105mm) of mine on D90. Any recommendation and RRP?
*
50/1.8, 85/1.4, 105/2, 135/2 and 200/2.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:09 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(kiroz @ Dec 21 2010, 10:19 AM)
If 50mm f/1.8d versus 35mm f/1.8g, which one is better for d90?


Is there any 3rd party equivalent lenses that costs cheaper than these? I broke already... tongue.gif
*
How can you compare 35mm with 50mm. The angle of view is different. It does different things. Like apples to oranges.

There are no equivalents. If you wanna play, you gotta pay.


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:10 am
QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 21 2010, 11:08 AM)
24mm f/1.4G can shoot portrait meh ? sleep.gif
*
Why not?

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 21 2010, 11:10 AM
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:12 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:08 AM)
Basically all the primes 50mm and above with biggest aperture available  drool.gif
*
Yup. Still considering the new 85/1.4 and 200/2. Maybe if next year is a good year... then 200/2! wub.gif
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:34 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 21 2010, 11:14 AM)
The way you listed macam anything wider than 50mm can't shoot portrait ma tongue.gif
9 blade with 77mm flex.gif
*
Thats cos its was a noob question... and the standard answer has always been a fast telephoto.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(iman_210 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:23 AM)
85mm f1.4 still not within my reach
*
The 85/1.8 is "good enough" if you ask me. With proper lighting you can't tell the difference between that and the 85/1.4, its lighter and it costs less than half the price. You only lose 2 things... ~2/3 of a stop of light, and some macho bragging rights. Other than that is a very fine piece of glass.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:41 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:37 AM)
Hahaa..... dammn, feel like selling off the 35mm n get the sigma 50mm  tongue.gif  my 1.8G can't do much =.=
*
And the neverending search for the "perfect" lens continues...
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Dec 21 2010, 11:40 AM)
Ew.. is that true bro? 35mm f/1.8 can't do much? I am about to buy it in next week. now you making me consider it again.  rclxub.gif
*
Buy first la... then a few weeks later trade in and "upgrade". Keep the economy rolling biggrin.gif
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 21 2010, 11:42 AM)
85 f/1.8 handling is very weird on big camera like D700, for me i can spot the colour difference compared to 1.4D... 1.8D is like missing something, not to mention the focus ring keep turning everytime u AF  doh.gif ..
*
Uh... colour difference? I don't see any colour difference on my copy of 1.8D and 1.4D... Did you do manual WB, shoot the exact same scene, and without any UV filters? If you use different UV filters... between brands there might be colour casts.

Even if there were, no big deal to just use the eyedropper tool to get middle gray back to where its supposed to be.

I agree on the handling, but it hasn't bothered me much.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 09:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



1855, 1870, 18105... All of them are sharp lenses, stopped down to f/8 or f/11 will give you critical sharpness. Of course wide open they're a little soft, lower contrast and have some veiling flare. This is where the primes win, at f/5.6, wide open for the zoom is already 3 stops down for the prime.

No cheap zoom will perform very well wide open. Even the expensive f/2.8 zooms have the same limitations wide open, though generally they're optimized to be sharp too wide open.

Stop down your zoom in good light and they perform just as well as primes. In low light, pop the strobes or switch to your prime.
adriancs
post Dec 21 2010, 11:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(angelic88 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:29 PM)
pic spam~
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


any tips shooting moon ?
*
Moons... you seen one, you've seen all... since everywhere in the world the moon shows its same face everytime. Great for testing your lens sharpness and atmospheric clarity, but thats about it.
adriancs
post Dec 23 2010, 07:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(faareast @ Dec 23 2010, 03:18 PM)
sorry off topic a bit...
want to ask if anybody here know the average charge for the work below

1) design a product review pamplet/booklet.
details : 4 page of a4 size... for 2 products (so two design).. they just provide with unedited pictures... i have to edit the pictures, design the layout,
arrange the wording, correcting the grammar..

2) design the company profile.
details: 8 pages of a4 sized, they only supply me with the wording. so other things like concept, and even pictures are shot by me..

so, i have finished my task, but i dont know how to charge..

they request the copyright from me and the softcopy also.. so, they will use the design not just once..

any body can help me?
*
You can charge whatever it is that you feel you're worth. Think about how much you'd earn an hour, and how many hours you put into that work, including travelling, shooting, editing, printing, etc... whatever costs, then plus maybe a 25% or 30% profit margin and you get your final price.

As for requesting copyrights and softcopies, you can always sell that too... for a price.

Look up google for some sample photog job contract, detailing the pricing, min number or hours work, or a lump sum deal; ownership of image and usage rights, and so on. Signing a contract, as well as any relevant copyright/mode usage/liabilityl release forms is always a good practice. It protects both you and your client. Think of it as a business, and put down in black and white what you'd like your company policy would be.
adriancs
post Dec 25 2010, 10:28 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(mrl @ Dec 25 2010, 08:06 PM)
I tend to turn off the flash as it usually will kill the beauty of the lights... the colour tone will be white and the only thing retains it original colour is the bulb... tongue.gif

so, i usually turn off the flash, slower shutter, pump up the ISO a little bit (heck, I once used ISO100 in i-City), and go for tripod...
*
Slap some CTO on the flash, and manually dial in Kelvin WB values. You'll get back the nice warm colours.


Added on December 25, 2010, 10:30 pm
QUOTE(BenSow @ Dec 25 2010, 10:25 PM)
haha yay yesterday PMR results out= I recieve prize money= enough money to get D3100.. Probably next two days will go buy.. wheeeee~ rclxm9.gif
*
Congratulations!!! Next do better for SPM arr.... whistling.gif

This post has been edited by adriancs: Dec 25 2010, 10:30 PM
adriancs
post Dec 25 2010, 11:45 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
871 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



QUOTE(mrl @ Dec 25 2010, 10:39 PM)
errr... since i'm still a learning newbie, what's CTO???  unsure.gif

ouh, D3000 dont have the Kelvin WB... T~T... but i think can adjust the kelvin in PP right...  tongue.gif
*
CTO is colour temperature orange. Its a piece of coloured gel plastic like tanglung cellophane in orange. Put some on your flash so that the colour is the same as the ambient lighting colour. If no kelvin setting them put to daylight wb.

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0500sec    0.80    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:18 AM