Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !
|
ComradeZ
|
Dec 6 2010, 02:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(iloveOov @ Dec 6 2010, 02:43 PM) said the guy who tag along in the poison marathon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waachaaa
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:02 PM
|
|
Any workshop available for D3100? New user here
|
|
|
|
|
|
celciuz
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Dec 6 2010, 01:15 PM) Hmm guys I found some bokeh shots with 50mm 1.8 and some actually can get round bokeh.. like this http://www.flickr.com/photos/ying4893/4215619873/not actually perfectly round but is better than what I thought. How do you guys think? If wide open still no round bokeh then something is wrong  . The 85mm f/1.8 also got polygon shape after step down to 2.8 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iloveOov
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:12 PM
|
Getting Started

|
celciuz and Bliz plz do stop poison us T_T....
|
|
|
|
|
|
geekster129
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:14 PM
|
|
^ I see your gears already get poisoned liao.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Dec 6 2010, 02:42 PM) How's ur 50mm wide open vs ur 70mm 's bokeh?? can fight?? not sharpness(coz can't fight at all), juz bokeh.... haha Sharpness for Sigma @ F/1.4 is not bad, i show u here, of course cannot compared to the sharpness of vr2 wide open... The sigma stopped down to F/2 is razor sharp already Untitled by BlizĀ®, on Flickr Here's one for the bokeh, is that good enough?  This shot wide open @ F/1.4.. DSC_2532 by BlizĀ®, on Flickr This post has been edited by Bliz: Dec 6 2010, 03:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent3888
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:15 PM) Sharpness for Sigma @ F/1.4 is not bad, i show u here, of course cannot compared to the sharpness of vr2 wide open... The sigma stopped down to F/2 is razor sharp already » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Untitled by BlizĀ®, on Flickr Here's one for the bokeh, is that good enough?  This shot wide open @ F/1.4.. DSC_2532 by BlizĀ®, on Flickr Wow.... The 1st shot is crop from iso4000?? I think is coz wider 50mm bokeh still lack of the oomphh of tighter zoom
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimurastanley
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:15 PM) Sharpness for Sigma @ F/1.4 is not bad, i show u here, of course cannot compared to the sharpness of vr2 wide open... The sigma stopped down to F/2 is razor sharp alreadyĀ Untitled by BlizĀ®, on Flickr Here's one for the bokeh, is that good enough?Ā  This shot wide open @ F/1.4.. DSC_2532 by BlizĀ®, on Flickr 2nd pic should use filled flash. just my 2 cents. The lens is quite sharp This post has been edited by kimurastanley: Dec 6 2010, 03:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:08 PM) If wide open still no round bokeh then something is wrong  . The 85mm f/1.8 also got polygon shape after step down to 2.8 or so. Oh I see, I thought wide open also no round bokeh =D ok ok thanks, it'll be my next purchase. Drooled on so many primes but no money, get 1.8 play first XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
razuryza
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:30 PM
|
|
no round bokeh. but cat's eyes bokeh with wide open
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Dec 6 2010, 03:23 PM) 2nd pic should use filled flash. just my 2 cents. The lens is quite sharp No more energy to carry my cam with flash attached, that's why all the pictures on the later round without flash
|
|
|
|
|
|
razuryza
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:32 PM) No more energy to carry my cam with flash attached, that's why all the pictures on the later round without flash  without flash oso nice whatt
|
|
|
|
|
|
chobo
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:39 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Dec 6 2010, 03:30 PM) no round bokeh. but cat's eyes bokeh with wide open » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « cat's eyes bokeh = expensive bokeh....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Dec 6 2010, 03:36 PM) without flash oso nice whatt  Thanx for the compliment, I actually like the pics without flash, cos it's like what you see when u are at the hall, natural lighting from the spotlights, won't kill the background also
|
|
|
|
|
|
wp188
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:41 PM
|
|
Walao...all spam "no tooth"(bokeh) photo~ thumbup
|
|
|
|
|
|
razuryza
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:40 PM) Thanx for the compliment, I actually like the pics without flash, cos it's like what you see when u are at the hall, natural lighting from the spotlights, won't kill the background also  ya2.. i like natural photo...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimurastanley
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:32 PM) No more energy to carry my cam with flash attached, that's why all the pictures on the later round without flash  HAHA.. I carry D90+SB800+70-200VR2, the outcome is sweating all over my shirts!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:44 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kimurastanley @ Dec 6 2010, 03:43 PM) HAHA.. I carry D90+SB800+70-200VR2, the outcome is sweating all over my shirts!!  Mine was D700+70-200vr2+sb900 along with Ep2, that's why in the later round I changed to 50mm sigma.. I was there from 10am till 9pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimurastanley
|
Dec 6 2010, 03:46 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 6 2010, 03:44 PM) Mine was D700+70-200vr2+sb900 along with Ep2, that's why in the later round I changed to 50mm sigma.. I was there from 10am till 9pm  WAH!! The power of FX!!! i am thinking upgrading D700 from D90. What is your opinion?? I stay there from 12.30pm to 5.30pm and cant tahan already
|
|
|
|
|