QUOTE(billytong @ Feb 18 2011, 02:09 PM)
Why would u want to hold a few hundred pips of drawdown when u can exit and wait for better entry. If you know the market is going on ur favor, u should have also know the risk involve.
There are risk that you tot the market should be bullish, but instead the market could went a few hundred pips against you and stays there or get worst. Some jerk in Central bank can easily blow all ur trades by a few statements. If thats happens thats a few hundred pips of loss or thousands.
While I agree that trading longer timeframe should have largr stops, but I will not agree that one should trade without a stop. besides stop with 20-30pips are usually good enough to handle the noise. Anything above its just means you get the market wrong. What Luqmaz suggest is what I would suggest too, it is a better way to trade, risk must be in controlled. no matter what.
I would rather eat that 20-30pips loss and reenter later than trying to hold 200-300pips drawdown, because if with 20-30pips loss I can make 10 mistakes and still losing the same as your rarer 1 mistake. If I make 10 losses in a roll, it is not the market goes wrong it is myself who got wrong.
Well thats just me and my perceptions. Cheers.
Long post, allow me to break it down to answer.
"Why would u want to hold a few hundred pips of drawdown when u can exit and wait for better entry."
I use a longer timeframe of which sometimes a few hundred pips would then only suffice to determine the trend.
"If you know the market is going on ur favor, u should have also know the risk involve."
Yes I do know. Thanks for the concerns though.
"There are risk that you tot the market should be bullish, but instead the market could went a few hundred pips against you and stays there or get worst. Some jerk in Central bank can easily blow all ur trades by a few statements. If thats happens thats a few hundred pips of loss or thousands."
Its a normal case for trading. When we enter a trade, we hope. We hope that in all our analysis, etc is proven right.
However in reality, it may not be, for whatever reasons it may be.
Reasons for the wrong analysis etc can vary from Central Bank to political unrest to anything the journalist could think of to feed in our minds. To me it is not so important as I rely only on my charts. Hence my reasons for my wrong analysis when it happens is fairly different from news events.
"While I agree that trading longer timeframe should have largr stops, but I will not agree that one should trade without a stop. besides stop with 20-30pips are usually good enough to handle the noise."
I did not mention that I trade without stop. I trade with mental stops, not stops keyed into the trading platform.
This is merely a case of preference meeting the monitoring time. I do not see any issue here.
20-30 pips may be sufficient if say one is using 15 minutes timeframe etc. For Daily chart, 20-30 pips is definitely insufficient to determine a trend change.
"Anything above its just means you get the market wrong. What Luqmaz suggest is what I would suggest too, it is a better way to trade, risk must be in controlled. no matter what."
Try not to impose the 20-30 pips which may work in your system into other systems which you may not be privy to.
Risks is controlled in my case, so no worries.
"I would rather eat that 20-30pips loss and reenter later than trying to hold 200-300pips drawdown, because if with 20-30pips loss I can make 10 mistakes and still losing the same as your rarer 1 mistake. If I make 10 losses in a roll, it is not the market goes wrong it is myself who got wrong."
Once again, 20-30 pips depends on your trading timeframe. I do keep open positions for months. So I really do not see why I should be concerned over 20-30 pips, otherwise, I need to worry about the movement almost every hour.
"Well thats just me and my perceptions. Cheers."
Thats right. And this is mine. LOLz. Cheers to you too!