Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Radeon™ Discussion V4, Cut Cut Cut!~ Go Red !

views
     
tech3910
post Nov 7 2010, 02:13 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(kahjye @ Nov 7 2010, 01:34 PM)
How about a sweet spot for a q9550? Hehe
I'm pairing it with 5850
*
sweet spot for any quad core shud b around 3.0 to 3.2

more den dat, the performance gain doesn't justify the extra heat & power used in OC.
tech3910
post Nov 7 2010, 02:40 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(kahjye @ Nov 7 2010, 02:37 PM)
hehe lets say if i use adjust the clock without touching the stock vcore and ram voltage, will it go to 3.2ghz? yawn.gif
*
it depends on how good is ur chip too.
i dont see y dat is not possible.

like my q6600, it has stock voltage (VID) @ 1.25v
i can get it up to 3.2GHz wit 1.232v
tech3910
post Nov 8 2010, 09:41 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE
[COLOR=blue]Some Cayman Radeon HD6970 specs[/COLOR]

1536 stream processors
We managed to get some specs of the soon-to-launch, well at least on paper, AMD Radeon HD 6970 card.

What we can share with you is that Cayman packs 1536 stream processors, 32ROPs, 96 Texture units and 2GB of GDDR5 memory.

We, the hard working people of Fudzilla, also have learned that the card comes with two DVI ports, 2 mini Display ports and HDMI, which is much better than what Nvidia's GTX 580 can offer.

TDP looks to be slightly lower than GTX 580’s but in worst case it looks to go up to the sky, something that we’ve seen with GTX 480 and almost 300W TDP in Furmark. Stay tuned, more specs will follow as soon as we can confirm them.


http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20759-so...eo-hd6970-specs

if the spec is like wat it says, it will b impressive AMD manage to squeeze more performance considering that 5870 has 1600sp, also 32ROPs but 80 texture unit
tech3910
post Nov 10 2010, 09:18 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


hm.....
will Accelero twin turbo fit on 6850?
tech3910
post Nov 10 2010, 09:26 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


yeah it does....
"HD 6870(with VR001), 6850(with VR001)"
tech3910
post Nov 10 2010, 11:53 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(wyyam @ Nov 10 2010, 11:14 PM)
Bro, can i CF my old cooler 5850 wif new cooler 5850 ?

If other brand oso can? example xFx n sapphire?
*
yes u can.

for more info, google for crossfire-x compatibility chart.


Added on November 11, 2010, 12:36 am
QUOTE
AMD Radeon HD 6970 delay due to component shortage, launch date to be re-confirmed

Partners not getting their AMD Radeon HD 6970 boards in time has led many to speculate AMD is indeed facing yield issues with its upcoming flagship GPU. However, an insider has shared a contradicting piece of news: the card's delay is not due to yield issues - production is perfectly fine, but rather a shortage of a particular component from Texas Instruments (TI) is the root cause of the hold-up.

This TI component is an integrated driver-MOSFET (DrMOS) that was first used on AMD's Radeon HD 6800 Series. This DrMOS is so new to the point there is no information on it on the Web, not even from the manufacturer itself.

Supply of this DrMOS is limited, and since the Radeon HD 6800 Series and upcoming HD 6900 Series share the same VRM design, any (tight) supply from TI is shared between all the cards. This leads to a delay in HD 6970 card manufacturing, with partners receiving their final boards late as well.

It is interesting to note that AMD has also withheld the final BIOS from partners. It is an open question as to whether NVIDIA's just-launched GeForce GTX 580 flagship GPU and its performance figures has anything to do with this. That aside, the initial 22nd November date may be set to change; AIBs will only know the final launch date from AMD at the end of this week.


http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-radeon-hd-...rmed/10276.html


Added on November 11, 2010, 12:39 am
QUOTE
Cayman HD 6970 to launch November 29th

The latest info that we have received on Cayman is that there might be a launch this month. It appears to be delayed by a single week and that the company will make it for a late November launch.

We’ve been hearing November 22nd as the launch date and some other people have indicated mid of that week and now the date is November 29th, but again things tend to change far too often.

We are not sure on the quantities and availability but ATI might have more cards than the competition expected. We are not sure about the performance, early report was that the prototype was slower than GTX 580, but who knows, with a tweak or two as well as an increased clock and better drivers, Cayman might have a chance. In any case it will be a very close race.

The plan is to launch Radeon HD 6970 and HD 6950 together, while the X2 dual chip version aka Radeon HD 6990 comes later, most likely in early 2011.


http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20812-ca...h-november-29th

This post has been edited by tech3910: Nov 11 2010, 12:39 AM
tech3910
post Nov 11 2010, 02:06 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(gaemon @ Nov 11 2010, 01:40 AM)
Is it justified to replace my 5870 for gtx580 or wait for 69xx series?
*
i think wit the release date of 6950/70 being this close, it would b stupid to buy a gtx580 without even checking out Cayman 1st.
tech3910
post Nov 11 2010, 10:41 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(zerorating @ Nov 11 2010, 09:58 AM)
i thought the media says that releasing date for hd6900 are delayed..nah...i hope they just bluffing...just hope they can get at least 25% performance increase for the same die size (but cayman die size maybe more)
*
delayed, but only delayed like 1 week, max i gav it a month.
i am pretty damn sure it's gonna com b4 xmas.


Added on November 11, 2010, 10:43 am
QUOTE(Jet23sky @ Nov 11 2010, 10:19 AM)
Actually I'm quite shock that Nvidia 580 is even cheaper than 480. It will then force AMD to restrict their price below RM1500 if they want to get the sales. The price is also not to expensive. Right now we still do not know whether 6970 can beat 580 or not. Thats why AMD needs to delay it and tune it even higher to beat 580 O.o.

Even 5970 got its price cut already. I think is around 1.5k as well. Man... Too many choices for those who are getting high performance card.  brows.gif

But the TDP is really make me sweat.gif , that kind of power hunger really scare me haha.
*
ah......the beauty of price war......

even wit the price cut, i'm not surprise dat AMD can make more $$$ selling a single 5970 compared to nvidia sell 1 gtx580.

This post has been edited by tech3910: Nov 11 2010, 10:43 AM
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 09:52 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE
AMD Cayman pushed back to December 13

Still before Christmas

We just got a nice little tip from one of our trusted sources that AMD just gave an official new date for Cayman launch, the 13th of December. This means that despite a brief delay, Cayman will still be on retail/e-tail shops before Christmas, and if the performance is right, will end up to be the fastest single GPU card this year.

The new date was given by AMD officially and probably sent to all partners and selected editors. It looks like the problem is quite real and partners mostly don't care about this delay as they have enough other cards to sell and as long as the card comes before Christmas. According to what we know, partners didn't recieve the final BIOS or the final driver for that matter, but that should hopefully change by the end of the month.

We are quite sure that we'll hear more about AMD's Cayman once it gets its final driver, as until then, the performance details are purely speculative and any early benchmark figures seen so far should be taken with a grain of salt, as proper drivers could squeeze out a bit more performance.


http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20833-am...-to-december-13
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 05:40 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE
AMD Radeon HD 6850/6870 Prices rise on inconsistent availability

AMD's Radeon HD 6800 series has been around for three weeks now. Despite being given a rude welcome by NVIDIA's major price cuts, the availability of Radeon HD 6800 cards had been very impressive for high value sweet-spot product. Earlier this week, there were strong signs of price increases, and this is confirmed by Tech Report's comprehensive availability survey. The Radeon HD 6850 seems to be most severely affected - with several vendors being out of stock. The median price has increased to $199 and only a single part is available at the original $179 SEP.

The Radeon HD 6870's availability is better, but prices have risen across the board. Only two parts are available at the $239 SEP and a majority are priced between $249 and $259.

Clearly, AMD is suffering from excess demand. Whether this is due to high demand, limited supply, or a combination of both, is unknown. Could it be due to the DrMOS shortages?

To make matters worse for AMD, GeForce prices are heading on the opposite direction - in steady decline. The GeForce GTX 470 is available for as low as $250. Many GeForce GTX 460 768MB parts are still available at $169, while the cheapest are as low as $159. Much of the overclocked 750-800 MHz GTX 460 1 GB are available in the $210-$220 range. The slightly overclocked Galaxy GTX 460 is now $189, and as low as $169 with rebates - a proper bargain. The best value is still the EVGA GTX 460 FTW, at $229, a card that trades blows with the now much more expensive HD 6870.

With Black Friday on the horizon, let's hope AMD can bolster supply and balance the market prices. Till then, NVIDIA has the decisive upper hand in terms of price/performance in the mainstream performance market.


http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-radeon-hd-...lity/10293.html
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 06:10 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE
AMD officialy comments Cayman delay

Week 50 launch

AMD's PR has come up with a new PR statement in which they try to explain why they have delayed the Cayman card. Back at Los Angeles, at the Barts HD 6870 and 6850 presentation, they said that Cayman should launch in late November and now the new date is the week of December 13th aka week 50th.

Here is the official note and then we will translate it to real non-PR language. We only wish George Carlin was around to lend us a hand.

“Demand for the ATI Radeon HD 5800 series continues to be very strong, the ATI Radeon HD 5970 remains the fastest graphics card in the world and the newest members of the AMD graphics family, the AMD Radeon HD 6850 and HD 6870, have set new standards for performance at their respective price points, and are available in volume.

With that in mind, we are going to take a bit more time before shipping the AMD Radeon HD 6900 series. As of today, the NDA lift for information relating to the AMD Radeon HD 6950 and HD 6970 will be week 50. We will be providing additional information on these products, including the exact date and time of the NDA lift, in the weeks prior to launch." said Chris Hook and his crack spinner team.

This is how you should read it. Our dual-chip is still the fastest but we dropped it to below €400 to put more pressure on Nvidia, simply as Cayman might not be fast enough to beat the GTX 580, at least not the original spec.

We (AMD) now have three more weeks to try to get more performance and do some additional testing and hope that Cayman HD 6970 and 6950 will be enough to beat the GTX 580.

The card will barely make for Christmas but for most of people mid-December is too late for Xmas shopping. Let’s hope for AMD’s sake that the tweaked Cayman Radeon HD 6970 can beat the GTX 580, but considering the delays, this is becoming increasingly unlikely. We are giving Nvidia a three week advantage because we have to, not because we like to.

One more thing, component shortage is not the reason for the delay, we got that cleared out as Barts had the same issue, and still launched / shipped on time.

Antilles, Radeon HD 6990 dual card now slip into 2011 and it looks that Nvidia's dual-card comes in 2011 as well. We we're hoping to see both of them before the end of the year, but it appears that both the red and the green team had to change their plans.


http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20836-am...ts-cayman-delay
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 06:43 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Fawkes @ Nov 12 2010, 06:40 PM)
Is the extra 1 year warranty from MSI compared to Sapphire worth the extra few bucks for 6870?
*
IMO, yes.
coz u could always hope for ur GC to die wen it's almost 3 years.
den u can RMA.
at dat time, 6870 has long been replace by 8870 or 9870.
wit som luck, manufacturer doesn't hav old stock let & replace ur 6870 wit new card.
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 07:16 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Fawkes @ Nov 12 2010, 07:07 PM)
Just to make sure, MSI warranty here is 2 years or 3 years? How's their warranty service?
*
the warranty service depends on distro.

i'm not sure bout MSI, but ASUS (from buildtech) & Giga (from nation tech *make sure not SDS) is great.
tech3910
post Nov 12 2010, 10:25 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Boldnut @ Nov 12 2010, 09:14 PM)
If Cayman XT is 300w, then AMD will not able to make hd6990 within 300w TDP even with 2 underclock cayman. U dont want a HD6990 become a 500w graphic card.

The way I see it is Cayman vs GTX580 is going to be like 5870 vs GTX480. If AMD want to fit 2 Cayman chip within 300w TDP. It just mean they cannot make a huge high power chip alone, this doesnt even fit AMD "Sweet spot design".

Even tho Cayman may be more efficient than Fermi, but I dont think it can be twice as efficient as Fermi. Cayman performance will be about 80-90% of GTX580. The delay is more like because AMD take another month to look into any additional tweaks to get extra performance, so Cayman performance wont fall too far away from GTX580 & repeat the success of 5870.
*
u r blinded by the fact dat wen AMD mention TPD, it always means the max power consumption of their card while wen nvidia sai gtx580 has ~250w TPD, it is saying average power consumption instead of peak.
fermi real TPD is >300w

lets do som basic logic.
6870 1120 sp.
6870 crossfire peak power consumption is still a lower then a single gtx580 (i can prove it if u wan).
now, lets say a 6970 has 1920 sp, rumored.
so it is safe to say that 6970 is sure to be <300w TPD.

also, 6990 will most like to to be 2x cayman pro instead of xt.

This post has been edited by tech3910: Nov 12 2010, 10:45 PM
tech3910
post Nov 13 2010, 02:30 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Nov 13 2010, 01:39 AM)
As the chip goes bigger, there will be more transistor leakage (IINM it rises exponentially). Which means AMD will have to run the GPU at higher voltage.
*
more leakage usually happen during the node process is young.
but 40nm is mature enough.
tech3910
post Nov 13 2010, 03:03 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


http://www.donanimhaber.com/ekran-karti/ha...ni-konustuk.htm

the video is in english wit turkish subtitle.

if u can bare through the powderful england, according to power color, 69xx is around b 30 - 50% faster den 68xx.

FYI, gtx580 is on average ~30% faster then 6870.
tech3910
post Nov 14 2010, 02:06 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Boldnut @ Nov 13 2010, 08:06 PM)
Which is just about the speed of GTX580. It is less likely Cayman XT be significant faster than the already quick GTX580. The only question is where it stands on the TDP. AMD said <300w it could be anywhere between 250w-300w
*
1 thing is certain, 6970 will b cheaper den gtx580
tech3910
post Nov 14 2010, 10:34 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Nov 14 2010, 10:22 PM)
Juz wanna ask noob questions here:
1. Im now using HD4870...and i want to upgrade to let say HD5000 and HD6000 series...the slot is still same right?
2. Is there much power different between them(mentioned above)..i scared my psu not enough... sweat.gif
*
1) yes, same

2) 5k series ad even 6870 is more power efficient compared to 4870. so if u can run 4870, sure u can run even 6870.
tech3910
post Nov 15 2010, 12:15 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


i'm not gonna buy 6 series.
is bcoz it is originally planed for 28nm.
so expect 6k series to b hot & more power hungry.
tech3910
post Nov 15 2010, 12:46 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


5970 is definite out of ur range wit 700 - 800
with 700 - 800, u can get 6870

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0428sec    0.34    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:36 AM