ahtvien, everything optical related, goes into my drybox...
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V47!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Oct 22 2010, 10:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Oct 22 2010, 10:50 PM) should i bought Marumi DRF14 Ring Flash? But only my a550 can use, i test it totaly diffrent taking macro using ring flash ask yourself, which camera will u use more for portraits/macro/product shoot? then if u can answer that question, then u know whether to buy or not |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Oct 22 2010, 11:09 PM) I using fillflash mode is that problem or slow sync or rear sync? i dont understand your question.. |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Oct 22 2010, 11:20 PM) i think he's asking which flash mode is best for macro. QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 11:29 PM) i think he's asking whether is it the fill flash mode or slow sync or rear sync mode which causes the a55 to not synchronise with the marumi ring flash? HAHHAHAA... my point exactly.. 2 different interpretations.. anyway, what u can try is that set your shutter speed below 1/60s, try 1/40s... coz some flashes only able to sync below those speeds. and since 3rd party flashes dont always have HSS, you're stuck with those speeds. not sure with the case of A550 though |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 08:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(boyzone @ Oct 23 2010, 07:55 AM) tested A55 with 18-55 SAM kit lens kwa kwa at home .... u using a macro lens? how are u getting 1:1 with your 18-55?feel different taste on e-view finder. If switch to manual and shoot macro in 1:1, is a bit difficult to focus. (maybe i still not familiar ) ISO noise level is a great improvement compare with my A550. I tested up to 6400.. noise level still acceptable. The return of ISO 100 is make me suprise ( should be recv a lot of complains from A550 ) Lightweight, holding design is more suitable for ladies .. Color saturate is more accurate compare with my A550. really enjoy on new LCD display.. ( cun than my A550 ) |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(hiansitt @ Oct 23 2010, 02:35 PM) VC = IS = OIS = VR but =/= SSS i dont understand what u mean by this.. why not?no wrong, they all to reduce vibration, but the first 4 is in-lense.. and SSS is in-body Added on October 23, 2010, 2:42 pmimportant is at the end of the day, the image you taken with those at lower shutter speeds, will be better compared to those without them.. This post has been edited by lwliam: Oct 23 2010, 02:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
yea, enough.. for th next 2-3 months
|
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 02:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(1212345656 @ Oct 23 2010, 02:46 PM) Wat u mean?? U r freaking me out!! eventually the hippo will be saturated also one ma, then u ma need to buy another hippo lor... |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
hydrometer only a couple of bucks ma... get one la... too dry, and the coatings will be damaged, too humid and you're better off putting the gears outside on the shelf
|
|
|
Oct 27 2010, 09:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Newbieeeeee @ Oct 27 2010, 09:04 AM) Which focus should I use if I want the focus to be wide? what's your point? if u want manual, use local then...Not Spot, Not local, Wide (but wide is auto.. can it be wide + manual?)? |
|
|
Oct 27 2010, 10:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Newbieeeeee @ Oct 27 2010, 10:10 AM) Nice! But the second picture the buildings over at < side cut into half.. Maybe by bringing them in would be better? My personal opinion.. =D however back u move around, there will still be buildings to the side of another building.. how then? |
|
|
Oct 27 2010, 11:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(8tvt @ Oct 27 2010, 10:41 AM) but i think photog also hunting for that kind of distortion from UWA.. u want distortion, go for fisheyeand some make a beautiful effect.. |
|
|
Oct 27 2010, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
converter is not exactly fisheye.. it mostly just drags the edges and distort it. IQ is unacceptable (for me at least)
save up for a Samyang 8mm |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2010, 12:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
albert, my sigma 24-70 finally gave way... need to send in for repairs d.. hhahhahha..
|
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 03:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
SAL 70-200 f/2.8 G
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Zicron @ Nov 9 2010, 02:27 PM) Hi people, please SPOILER the pics before reply. +111goshhh, its been quite some time.... MEGA busy.. @_@ can faint... |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Zicron @ Nov 9 2010, 04:00 PM) No wonder dint come for TT, we tested 12-24 u know demmit, when was it? Added on November 9, 2010, 4:15 pmi actually held the 12-24 before, and its freaking heavy for an UWA (at least its FF compatible to compensate for the downside of the weight ) This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 9 2010, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
ahhhhh, KLPF.. had wedding shoot that weekend... yeah, go figure
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 12:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
   all shots taken with 135mm f/1.8 |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 01:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
thanks to your lens bro! lol..
  This post has been edited by lwliam: Nov 10 2010, 02:38 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0628sec
 0.60
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 06:19 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.